Association of anaesthesia-directed sedation with unplanned discharge to a nursing home following non-ambulatory interventional radiology and endoscopic procedures: a retrospective cohort study*

IF 6.9 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1111/anae.16497
Annika Eyth, Felix Borngaesser, Osamah M. Zmily, Maíra I. Rudolph, Ling Zhang, Vilma A. Joseph, Oleg V. Evgenov, Jason Oliveira, Nicholas Kolmel, Seena Dehkharghani, Irene Osborn, Michael E. Kiyatkin, Andrew D. Racine, Peter P. Semczuk, Shweta Garg, Karuna Wongtangman, Matthias Eikermann, Ibraheem M. Karaye
{"title":"Association of anaesthesia-directed sedation with unplanned discharge to a nursing home following non-ambulatory interventional radiology and endoscopic procedures: a retrospective cohort study*","authors":"Annika Eyth,&nbsp;Felix Borngaesser,&nbsp;Osamah M. Zmily,&nbsp;Maíra I. Rudolph,&nbsp;Ling Zhang,&nbsp;Vilma A. Joseph,&nbsp;Oleg V. Evgenov,&nbsp;Jason Oliveira,&nbsp;Nicholas Kolmel,&nbsp;Seena Dehkharghani,&nbsp;Irene Osborn,&nbsp;Michael E. Kiyatkin,&nbsp;Andrew D. Racine,&nbsp;Peter P. Semczuk,&nbsp;Shweta Garg,&nbsp;Karuna Wongtangman,&nbsp;Matthias Eikermann,&nbsp;Ibraheem M. Karaye","doi":"10.1111/anae.16497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Interventional radiology procedures and endoscopies are performed commonly worldwide, often necessitating pharmacological sedation to optimise patient comfort. It is unclear to what extent non-anaesthetists should provide procedural sedation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We studied adult patients who previously lived independently and underwent a non-ambulatory interventional radiology or gastroenterology procedure under anaesthetist-directed or non-anaesthetist-directed sedation at a large healthcare network. The primary outcomes were postprocedural adverse discharge to a nursing home and postprocedural duration of hospital stay.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among 22,868 patients included, 15,168 (66.3%) and 7700 (33.7%) underwent anaesthetist-directed sedation and non-anaesthetist-directed sedation, respectively. Of all patients receiving anaesthetist-directed sedation, 9.2% experienced adverse discharge to a nursing home compared with 21.3% undergoing non-anaesthetist-directed sedation. Anaesthetist-directed sedation was associated with reduced risk of adverse discharge to a nursing home (adjusted relative risk 0.54, 95%CI 0.45–0.63, p &lt; 0.001, adjusted risk difference -4.6%, 95%CI -5.8 to -3.4, p &lt; 0.001) and a shorter postprocedural duration of hospital stay (median (IQR [range]) 2 (1–6 [0–315]) days vs. 5 (2–12 [0–268]) days; adjusted model estimate 0.84, 95%CI 0.79–0.89, p &lt; 0.001). The lower risk of adverse discharge to a nursing home and shorter duration of hospital stay in patients undergoing anaesthetist-directed sedation was reproduced in an instrumental variable analysis (adjusted risk difference -4.3%, 95%CI -8.4 to -0.1, p = 0.043; and -1.41 days, 95%CI -1.43 to -1.41 days, p &lt; 0.001, respectively). Among patients undergoing anaesthetist-directed sedation the mean (SD) proportion of missing blood pressure measurements was lower (0.7 (4.9) % vs. 8.0 (14.6) %, p &lt; 0.001), which mediated the effect of anaesthetist-directed sedation on adverse discharge.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>Among patients undergoing a non-ambulatory interventional radiology procedure or a gastrointestinal endoscopy, anaesthetist-directed sedation is associated with a reduced risk of adverse discharge to a nursing home and a shorter duration of hospital stay.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7742,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia","volume":"80 3","pages":"288-298"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://associationofanaesthetists-publications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anae.16497","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Interventional radiology procedures and endoscopies are performed commonly worldwide, often necessitating pharmacological sedation to optimise patient comfort. It is unclear to what extent non-anaesthetists should provide procedural sedation.

Methods

We studied adult patients who previously lived independently and underwent a non-ambulatory interventional radiology or gastroenterology procedure under anaesthetist-directed or non-anaesthetist-directed sedation at a large healthcare network. The primary outcomes were postprocedural adverse discharge to a nursing home and postprocedural duration of hospital stay.

Results

Among 22,868 patients included, 15,168 (66.3%) and 7700 (33.7%) underwent anaesthetist-directed sedation and non-anaesthetist-directed sedation, respectively. Of all patients receiving anaesthetist-directed sedation, 9.2% experienced adverse discharge to a nursing home compared with 21.3% undergoing non-anaesthetist-directed sedation. Anaesthetist-directed sedation was associated with reduced risk of adverse discharge to a nursing home (adjusted relative risk 0.54, 95%CI 0.45–0.63, p < 0.001, adjusted risk difference -4.6%, 95%CI -5.8 to -3.4, p < 0.001) and a shorter postprocedural duration of hospital stay (median (IQR [range]) 2 (1–6 [0–315]) days vs. 5 (2–12 [0–268]) days; adjusted model estimate 0.84, 95%CI 0.79–0.89, p < 0.001). The lower risk of adverse discharge to a nursing home and shorter duration of hospital stay in patients undergoing anaesthetist-directed sedation was reproduced in an instrumental variable analysis (adjusted risk difference -4.3%, 95%CI -8.4 to -0.1, p = 0.043; and -1.41 days, 95%CI -1.43 to -1.41 days, p < 0.001, respectively). Among patients undergoing anaesthetist-directed sedation the mean (SD) proportion of missing blood pressure measurements was lower (0.7 (4.9) % vs. 8.0 (14.6) %, p < 0.001), which mediated the effect of anaesthetist-directed sedation on adverse discharge.

Discussion

Among patients undergoing a non-ambulatory interventional radiology procedure or a gastrointestinal endoscopy, anaesthetist-directed sedation is associated with a reduced risk of adverse discharge to a nursing home and a shorter duration of hospital stay.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
麻醉导向镇静与非门诊介入放射和内窥镜手术后意外出院的关系:一项回顾性队列研究*
介入放射学和内窥镜检查在世界范围内普遍进行,通常需要药物镇静来优化患者的舒适度。目前尚不清楚非麻醉师应在多大程度上提供程序性镇静。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anaesthesia
Anaesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
9.30%
发文量
300
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the Association of Anaesthetists is Anaesthesia. It is a comprehensive international publication that covers a wide range of topics. The journal focuses on general and regional anaesthesia, as well as intensive care and pain therapy. It includes original articles that have undergone peer review, covering all aspects of these fields, including research on equipment.
期刊最新文献
Strategies to advance gender equity in anaesthesia leadership: a state-of-the-art review. Pre-oxygenation in patients living with obesity: a reply. Best practice in obstetric general anaesthesia: an umbrella review of pharmacological strategies for induction of general anaesthesia. Use of sterile gowns for single-shot spinal anaesthesia: consensus guidelines from the Association of Anaesthetists, Royal College of Anaesthetists, Obstetric Anaesthetists' Association, Regional Anaesthesia UK, College of Anaesthesiologists of Ireland and Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists. Issue Information – Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1