Trauma video review analysis: Increased provider movement impedes trauma team performance

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY American journal of surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116121
Bahaa Succar , Nicole Lunardi , Kaustubh Gopal , Macy Afsari , Madhuri B. Nagaraj , Herbert J. Zeh III , Ryan P. Dumas
{"title":"Trauma video review analysis: Increased provider movement impedes trauma team performance","authors":"Bahaa Succar ,&nbsp;Nicole Lunardi ,&nbsp;Kaustubh Gopal ,&nbsp;Macy Afsari ,&nbsp;Madhuri B. Nagaraj ,&nbsp;Herbert J. Zeh III ,&nbsp;Ryan P. Dumas","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Trauma team performance, measured by the non-technical skills scale T-NOTECHS, has been shown to impact patient outcomes. We assess how personnel movements affect non-technical skills and time of resuscitation(TOR) using trauma video review.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A prospective study of blunt and/or penetrating trauma activations recorded between May and November 2023 ​at a Level-I trauma center. Regressions controlling for confounders were used to measure the association between foot traffic and the outcomes of interest<sup>1</sup>: TOR<sup>2</sup> T-NOTECHS score(Smith et al., 2015; Mackenzie et al., 2007; Maiga et al., 2024; Vella et al., 2024; Pucher et al., 2014; Dumas et al., 2020; Succar et al., 2024; Steinemann et al., 2012; Andersson et al., 2012; Conrad et al., 2010; Lies and Zhang, 2015) .5-155-15</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified 77 trauma activations, with 40 ​%(n ​= ​32/77) penetrating injuries. There was a median of 17[14–18] individuals at the start of trauma activations. During resuscitations, individuals entered the room a median of 12[8–18] times and exited the room 17[11–22] times. The median TOR was 8[6–10] min and the median T-NOTECHS was 7[6–8]. Regression analysis showed foot traffic was independently associated with increased TOR(β 0.34, p-value &lt;0.01) and worse total T-NOTECHS score(β 0.06, p ​&lt; ​0.01).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Higher foot traffic is associated with poorer team performance and delays in resuscitation. Future directions should further explore environmental and personal factors that may impede performance metrics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":"240 ","pages":"Article 116121"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002961024006731","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Trauma team performance, measured by the non-technical skills scale T-NOTECHS, has been shown to impact patient outcomes. We assess how personnel movements affect non-technical skills and time of resuscitation(TOR) using trauma video review.

Methods

A prospective study of blunt and/or penetrating trauma activations recorded between May and November 2023 ​at a Level-I trauma center. Regressions controlling for confounders were used to measure the association between foot traffic and the outcomes of interest1: TOR2 T-NOTECHS score(Smith et al., 2015; Mackenzie et al., 2007; Maiga et al., 2024; Vella et al., 2024; Pucher et al., 2014; Dumas et al., 2020; Succar et al., 2024; Steinemann et al., 2012; Andersson et al., 2012; Conrad et al., 2010; Lies and Zhang, 2015) .5-155-15

Results

We identified 77 trauma activations, with 40 ​%(n ​= ​32/77) penetrating injuries. There was a median of 17[14–18] individuals at the start of trauma activations. During resuscitations, individuals entered the room a median of 12[8–18] times and exited the room 17[11–22] times. The median TOR was 8[6–10] min and the median T-NOTECHS was 7[6–8]. Regression analysis showed foot traffic was independently associated with increased TOR(β 0.34, p-value <0.01) and worse total T-NOTECHS score(β 0.06, p ​< ​0.01).

Conclusions

Higher foot traffic is associated with poorer team performance and delays in resuscitation. Future directions should further explore environmental and personal factors that may impede performance metrics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创伤视频回顾分析:增加的提供者移动阻碍了创伤团队的表现。
简介:创伤团队的表现,由非技术技能量表T-NOTECHS衡量,已被证明影响患者的结果。我们评估人员流动如何影响非技术技能和复苏时间(TOR)使用创伤视频回顾。方法:对2023年5月至11月在一级创伤中心记录的钝性和/或穿透性创伤激活进行前瞻性研究。使用控制混杂因素的回归来测量人流量与感兴趣结果之间的关联1:TOR2 T-NOTECHS评分(Smith et al., 2015;Mackenzie et al., 2007;Maiga等,2024;Vella et al., 2024;Pucher et al., 2014;Dumas et al., 2020;Succar et al., 2024;Steinemann等人,2012;Andersson等人,2012;Conrad et al., 2010;结果:我们发现了77例创伤激活,其中40% (n = 32/77)为穿透性损伤。在创伤激活开始时,中位数为17人[14-18]。在复苏过程中,个体进入房间的平均次数为12次[8-18],离开房间的平均次数为17次[11-22]。中位TOR为8[6-10]min,中位T-NOTECHS为7[6-8]。回归分析显示,人流量与TOR升高独立相关(β 0.34, p值)。结论:较高的人流量与较差的团队绩效和复苏延迟相关。未来的方向应该进一步探索可能阻碍绩效指标的环境和个人因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
570
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Surgery® is a peer-reviewed journal designed for the general surgeon who performs abdominal, cancer, vascular, head and neck, breast, colorectal, and other forms of surgery. AJS is the official journal of 7 major surgical societies* and publishes their official papers as well as independently submitted clinical studies, editorials, reviews, brief reports, correspondence and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Table of Contents Emeritus Editorial Board The general surgery match in the step 1 pass/fail era: Leveling the playing field or moving the goalpost? The proverbial glass ceiling: You might need a new tool when it's seemingly made of concrete.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1