Levels of Evidence Supporting Recommendations in Gastroenterology.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2024-12-06 DOI:10.14309/ctg.0000000000000797
Miyabi Saito, Amy Yu, Nneka N Ufere, Andrew Chan, Bharati Kochar
{"title":"Levels of Evidence Supporting Recommendations in Gastroenterology.","authors":"Miyabi Saito, Amy Yu, Nneka N Ufere, Andrew Chan, Bharati Kochar","doi":"10.14309/ctg.0000000000000797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We aimed to analyze gastrointestinal guidelines to assess the quality of evidence and strength of recommendation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We abstracted clinical practice guidelines and guidance statements from 4 American gastroenterology societies (American College of Gastroenterology, American Gastroenterological Association, American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, and American Association for the Study of Liver Disease) and the US Multi-Society Task Force.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 3,609 statements analyzed, only 13% were supported by high level of evidence. The number of statements published annually is increasing, but the level of evidence supporting recommendations is declining over time.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This analysis highlights the need for high quality research in gastroenterology to support the development of stronger evidence-based guideline statements.</p>","PeriodicalId":10278,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000797","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: We aimed to analyze gastrointestinal guidelines to assess the quality of evidence and strength of recommendation.

Methods: We abstracted clinical practice guidelines and guidance statements from 4 American gastroenterology societies (American College of Gastroenterology, American Gastroenterological Association, American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, and American Association for the Study of Liver Disease) and the US Multi-Society Task Force.

Results: Of the 3,609 statements analyzed, only 13% were supported by high level of evidence. The number of statements published annually is increasing, but the level of evidence supporting recommendations is declining over time.

Discussion: This analysis highlights the need for high quality research in gastroenterology to support the development of stronger evidence-based guideline statements.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
支持胃肠病学建议的证据水平。
我们的目的是分析胃肠道指南,以评估证据质量和推荐力度。方法:我们从4个美国GI学会(ACG、AGA、ASGE和AASLD)和美国多学会工作组中提取临床实践指南和指导声明。结果:在分析的3609个陈述中,只有13%得到了高水平证据的支持。每年发表的声明数量正在增加,但支持建议的证据水平随着时间的推移而下降。结论:该分析强调了对GI进行高质量研究的必要性,以支持制定更强有力的循证指南声明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology
Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
114
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology (CTG), published on behalf of the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), is a peer-reviewed open access online journal dedicated to innovative clinical work in the field of gastroenterology and hepatology. CTG hopes to fulfill an unmet need for clinicians and scientists by welcoming novel cohort studies, early-phase clinical trials, qualitative and quantitative epidemiologic research, hypothesis-generating research, studies of novel mechanisms and methodologies including public health interventions, and integration of approaches across organs and disciplines. CTG also welcomes hypothesis-generating small studies, methods papers, and translational research with clear applications to human physiology or disease. Colon and small bowel Endoscopy and novel diagnostics Esophagus Functional GI disorders Immunology of the GI tract Microbiology of the GI tract Inflammatory bowel disease Pancreas and biliary tract Liver Pathology Pediatrics Preventative medicine Nutrition/obesity Stomach.
期刊最新文献
A Randomized, Comparative Trial of a Potassium-Competitive Acid Blocker (X842) and Lansoprazole for the Treatment of Patients With Erosive Esophagitis. PREVALENCE AND PATTERNS OF OPIOID USE IN CHRONIC PANCREATITIS. Fact or Myth? Black Patients Do Not Want to Participate in Clinical Trials. Machine Learning-Guided Fluid Resuscitation for Acute Pancreatitis Improves Outcomes. Whole Transcriptome-Wide Analysis Combined with Summarydata-Based Mendelian Randomization Identifies High-Riskgenes for Cholelithiasis Incidence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1