Long-Term Outcomes of Ceramic Veneers Restorations: A Comprehensive Analysis of Clinical and Patient-Reported Metrics.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1111/jerd.13377
Thitiorn Panayong, Wareeratn Chengprapakorn, Nareudee Limpuangthip, Pravej Serichetaphongse
{"title":"Long-Term Outcomes of Ceramic Veneers Restorations: A Comprehensive Analysis of Clinical and Patient-Reported Metrics.","authors":"Thitiorn Panayong, Wareeratn Chengprapakorn, Nareudee Limpuangthip, Pravej Serichetaphongse","doi":"10.1111/jerd.13377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the clinical performance of ceramic veneers after 9-10 years, assess patient-reported outcomes, and examine their associations.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Thirty patients with ceramic veneers aged 9-10 years were recalled for a clinical examination. Each participant completed a questionnaire on satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life, specifically using the Oral Impact on Daily Performance (OIDP) scale. The chi-square or Fisher exact test was used to assess the associations between tooth position and professional evaluations of veneer success and individual items. Consistency between professional evaluations of the veneers and patient-reported outcomes was evaluated using Weight Kappa.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 30 patients with 233 veneers participated in the study. Clinical evaluations deemed 9.87% (n = 23) of veneers as successful, 79.40% (n = 185) as surviving with complications, and 10.73% (n = 25) as a failure. The most common complications were marginal adaptation, gingival inflammation, and marginal discoloration. The participants were most frequently dissatisfied with the function of the veneers, food impaction, and cleaning difficulties. The OIDP assessment indicated that problems on daily activities such as cleaning, eating, and sleeping were predominantly affected. There were significant consistencies between certain clinical performance attributes and patient-reported outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The survival rate of ceramic veneers was 89.3% after 9-10 years of follow-up. Among these, 79.4% had survived with complications such as material defects, secondary caries, and gingival problems. Given the discrepancies between patient-reported outcomes and clinical evaluations, further investigations into patient perception are needed alongside traditional clinical assessments.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Educating patients about the potential complications associated with veneer restoration, especially specific to tooth location, is essential. Additionally, advising patients on proper oral hygiene practices is recommended to minimize the risk of gingival inflammation to enhance the longevity of the restoration.</p>","PeriodicalId":15988,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13377","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical performance of ceramic veneers after 9-10 years, assess patient-reported outcomes, and examine their associations.

Materials and methods: Thirty patients with ceramic veneers aged 9-10 years were recalled for a clinical examination. Each participant completed a questionnaire on satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life, specifically using the Oral Impact on Daily Performance (OIDP) scale. The chi-square or Fisher exact test was used to assess the associations between tooth position and professional evaluations of veneer success and individual items. Consistency between professional evaluations of the veneers and patient-reported outcomes was evaluated using Weight Kappa.

Results: A total of 30 patients with 233 veneers participated in the study. Clinical evaluations deemed 9.87% (n = 23) of veneers as successful, 79.40% (n = 185) as surviving with complications, and 10.73% (n = 25) as a failure. The most common complications were marginal adaptation, gingival inflammation, and marginal discoloration. The participants were most frequently dissatisfied with the function of the veneers, food impaction, and cleaning difficulties. The OIDP assessment indicated that problems on daily activities such as cleaning, eating, and sleeping were predominantly affected. There were significant consistencies between certain clinical performance attributes and patient-reported outcomes.

Conclusions: The survival rate of ceramic veneers was 89.3% after 9-10 years of follow-up. Among these, 79.4% had survived with complications such as material defects, secondary caries, and gingival problems. Given the discrepancies between patient-reported outcomes and clinical evaluations, further investigations into patient perception are needed alongside traditional clinical assessments.

Clinical significance: Educating patients about the potential complications associated with veneer restoration, especially specific to tooth location, is essential. Additionally, advising patients on proper oral hygiene practices is recommended to minimize the risk of gingival inflammation to enhance the longevity of the restoration.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
陶瓷贴面修复的长期结果:临床和患者报告指标的综合分析。
目的:本研究旨在评估9-10年后陶瓷贴面的临床表现,评估患者报告的结果,并检查其相关性。材料与方法:对30例9 ~ 10岁的烤瓷贴面患者进行临床检查。每位参与者都完成了满意度和口腔健康相关生活质量的问卷调查,特别是使用口腔对日常表现的影响(OIDP)量表。使用卡方检验或Fisher精确检验来评估牙齿位置与贴面成功和个别项目的专业评估之间的关系。使用Weight Kappa评估贴面的专业评估和患者报告的结果之间的一致性。结果:共30例患者,共233例贴片参与研究。临床评估认为9.87% (n = 23)的贴片成功,79.40% (n = 185)的贴片存在并发症,10.73% (n = 25)的贴片失败。最常见的并发症是边缘适应、牙龈炎症和边缘变色。参与者最不满意的是贴面的功能、食物嵌塞和清洁困难。OIDP评估表明,日常活动问题,如清洁、饮食和睡眠,主要受到影响。某些临床表现属性与患者报告的结果之间存在显著的一致性。结论:经过9 ~ 10年的随访,烤瓷贴面的成活率为89.3%。其中,79.4%的患者存在材料缺损、继发性龋齿和牙龈问题等并发症。鉴于患者报告的结果与临床评估之间的差异,除了传统的临床评估外,还需要进一步调查患者的感知。临床意义:教育患者与贴面修复相关的潜在并发症,特别是特定的牙齿位置,是必不可少的。此外,建议患者保持良好的口腔卫生习惯,以尽量减少牙龈炎症的风险,延长修复的寿命。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
124
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry (JERD) is the longest standing peer-reviewed journal devoted solely to advancing the knowledge and practice of esthetic dentistry. Its goal is to provide the very latest evidence-based information in the realm of contemporary interdisciplinary esthetic dentistry through high quality clinical papers, sound research reports and educational features. The range of topics covered in the journal includes: - Interdisciplinary esthetic concepts - Implants - Conservative adhesive restorations - Tooth Whitening - Prosthodontic materials and techniques - Dental materials - Orthodontic, periodontal and endodontic esthetics - Esthetics related research - Innovations in esthetics
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Effect of Three Heating Guns on the Temperature of Two Bulk-Fill Resin-Based Composites. Fracture Resistance of Maxillary Premolars With Class II MOD Cavities Restored With Direct and Indirect Resin Composite Restorative Systems. Effect of Simulated Tooth Brushing on Surface Roughness, Gloss, and Color Stability of Milled and Printed Permanent Restorative Materials. Reliability of Dental Shade Selection Methods: Agreement Among Spectrophotometer, Intraoral Scanner, and Cross-Polarization Photography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1