Reliability of cushion construction for a low-cost pressure-reducing wheelchair cushion for less-resourced settings.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology Pub Date : 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1080/17483107.2024.2436637
Emma M Smith, Abilee J Danielson, Rhaya L Howich, Aditya Dhariwal, William C Miller
{"title":"Reliability of cushion construction for a low-cost pressure-reducing wheelchair cushion for less-resourced settings.","authors":"Emma M Smith, Abilee J Danielson, Rhaya L Howich, Aditya Dhariwal, William C Miller","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2024.2436637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> In less-resourced settings, 80% of people with spinal cord injuries die from pressure ulcer complications within two years. Appropriately constructed wheelchair cushions are effective in reducing incidence and severity of pressure ulcers. The Tuball is an inexpensive wheelchair cushion designed for users in less-resourced settings, which can be reproduced by local clinicians using locally sourced materials. This paper aimed to assess whether different individuals with limited knowledge of cushion construction could reliably construct the Tuball cushion.</p><p><p><b>Materials and Methods:</b> A convenience sample of eleven occupational therapy students were randomly assigned to one of two groups. Six participants constructed a Tuball and completed a subjective workload assessment. Five different participants sat on each cushion while pressure distributions were mapped. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated for reliability of construction of each cushion using data from a range of pressure indices: dispersion index (primary outcome), peak pressure index, contact area, and seat pressure index (secondary outcomes) across all six cushions.</p><p><p><b>Results and Conclusions:</b> The ICC across all cushions was 0.745 (95% CI 0.103-0.970) for dispersion index. ICCs across cushions for secondary outcomes ranged from 0.879 to 0.951. Good-moderate reliability was found for the reliability in cushion construction as measured by the dispersion index. Excellent reliability in cushion construction was found as measured by peak pressure index, contact area, and seat pressure index. Data indicates individuals can reliably construct the Tuball given equivalent materials and instructions.</p>","PeriodicalId":47806,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2024.2436637","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: In less-resourced settings, 80% of people with spinal cord injuries die from pressure ulcer complications within two years. Appropriately constructed wheelchair cushions are effective in reducing incidence and severity of pressure ulcers. The Tuball is an inexpensive wheelchair cushion designed for users in less-resourced settings, which can be reproduced by local clinicians using locally sourced materials. This paper aimed to assess whether different individuals with limited knowledge of cushion construction could reliably construct the Tuball cushion.

Materials and Methods: A convenience sample of eleven occupational therapy students were randomly assigned to one of two groups. Six participants constructed a Tuball and completed a subjective workload assessment. Five different participants sat on each cushion while pressure distributions were mapped. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated for reliability of construction of each cushion using data from a range of pressure indices: dispersion index (primary outcome), peak pressure index, contact area, and seat pressure index (secondary outcomes) across all six cushions.

Results and Conclusions: The ICC across all cushions was 0.745 (95% CI 0.103-0.970) for dispersion index. ICCs across cushions for secondary outcomes ranged from 0.879 to 0.951. Good-moderate reliability was found for the reliability in cushion construction as measured by the dispersion index. Excellent reliability in cushion construction was found as measured by peak pressure index, contact area, and seat pressure index. Data indicates individuals can reliably construct the Tuball given equivalent materials and instructions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
低成本减压轮椅坐垫在资源匮乏环境下的可靠性。
目的:在资源匮乏的环境中,80%的脊髓损伤患者在两年内死于压疮并发症。适当构造的轮椅坐垫可有效降低压疮的发生率和严重程度。Tuball是一种廉价的轮椅坐垫,专为资源匮乏地区的用户设计,可由当地临床医生使用当地采购的材料进行复制。本文旨在评估不同的个体在对缓冲结构知识有限的情况下是否能够可靠地构建Tuball缓冲结构。材料与方法:选取11名职业治疗专业学生作为方便样本,随机分为两组。6名参与者构建Tuball并完成主观工作量评估。五个不同的参与者坐在每个垫子上,同时绘制压力分布图。使用一系列压力指标的数据计算每个气垫结构可靠性的类内相关系数(ICC),其95%置信区间为:所有六个气垫的弥散指数(主要结果)、峰值压力指数、接触面积和座位压力指数(次要结果)。结果和结论:所有缓冲垫的弥散指数ICC为0.745 (95% CI 0.103-0.970)。次要结局各缓冲垫的icc范围为0.879 ~ 0.951。用弥散指数测定的垫层结构的信度为中优信度。通过测量峰值压力指数、接触面积和阀座压力指数,发现了良好的缓冲结构可靠性。数据表明,在给定等效材料和指令的情况下,个人可以可靠地构建Tuball。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
13.60%
发文量
128
期刊最新文献
Tools and devices for telerehabilitation in pediatric and adult cystic fibrosis patients: a scoping review. Design priorities for an at-home upper limb stroke rehabilitation robot. Bridging gaps in technology adoption for disabilities. Estimating power wheelchair electronics lifespan based on real-world data. Tiny drivers, big decisions: parental perceptions and experiences of power mobility device trials for young children with cerebral palsy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1