Applying health equity implementation science frameworks to population genetic screening.

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Frontiers in health services Pub Date : 2024-11-21 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frhs.2024.1455365
Nandana D Rao, Stephanie M Fullerton, Brian H Shirts, Annie T Chen, Nora B Henrikson
{"title":"Applying health equity implementation science frameworks to population genetic screening.","authors":"Nandana D Rao, Stephanie M Fullerton, Brian H Shirts, Annie T Chen, Nora B Henrikson","doi":"10.3389/frhs.2024.1455365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Implementation science frameworks with a focus on health equity have emerged to help guide the introduction of new interventions into healthcare and community settings while limiting health disparities. The purpose of this research was to explore the applicability of such frameworks to guide the equitable implementation of population genetic screening programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed and reference lists for relevant frameworks and examples of their use in health settings. We then assessed if and how selected frameworks provide guidance for different stages of population genetic screening: recruitment, sample collection, result return, follow-up care and long-term management, and cascade screening. Findings were synthesized into a list of health equity considerations specific to each stage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 5 implementation frameworks that focus on health equity. Guidance varied by framework type: determinant (explaining what affects implementation outcomes), process (translating research into practice), or evaluation (assessing implementation). Common characteristics included focusing implementation efforts on populations who have historically experienced health inequities and adapting interventions to fit local contexts. Process models also highlighted the importance of community partnerships.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Overall, frameworks offered broad recommendations applicable to population genetic screening program implementation. However, gaps still exist in guidance provided for later stages of population genetic screening. To improve the equitable implementation of genetic screening, future programs may benefit from utilizing one or more of these frameworks or by incorporating the health equity considerations and outcomes compiled in this analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":73088,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in health services","volume":"4 ","pages":"1455365"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11617557/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in health services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2024.1455365","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Implementation science frameworks with a focus on health equity have emerged to help guide the introduction of new interventions into healthcare and community settings while limiting health disparities. The purpose of this research was to explore the applicability of such frameworks to guide the equitable implementation of population genetic screening programs.

Methods: We searched PubMed and reference lists for relevant frameworks and examples of their use in health settings. We then assessed if and how selected frameworks provide guidance for different stages of population genetic screening: recruitment, sample collection, result return, follow-up care and long-term management, and cascade screening. Findings were synthesized into a list of health equity considerations specific to each stage.

Results: We identified 5 implementation frameworks that focus on health equity. Guidance varied by framework type: determinant (explaining what affects implementation outcomes), process (translating research into practice), or evaluation (assessing implementation). Common characteristics included focusing implementation efforts on populations who have historically experienced health inequities and adapting interventions to fit local contexts. Process models also highlighted the importance of community partnerships.

Discussion: Overall, frameworks offered broad recommendations applicable to population genetic screening program implementation. However, gaps still exist in guidance provided for later stages of population genetic screening. To improve the equitable implementation of genetic screening, future programs may benefit from utilizing one or more of these frameworks or by incorporating the health equity considerations and outcomes compiled in this analysis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将卫生公平实施科学框架应用于人口遗传筛查。
导语:以卫生公平为重点的实施科学框架已经出现,以帮助指导在卫生保健和社区环境中引入新的干预措施,同时限制卫生差距。本研究的目的是探讨这些框架的适用性,以指导公平实施人口遗传筛选计划。方法:我们检索PubMed和参考文献列表,查找相关框架及其在卫生机构中使用的示例。然后,我们评估了所选框架是否以及如何为群体遗传筛查的不同阶段提供指导:招募、样本收集、结果返回、随访护理和长期管理,以及级联筛查。研究结果被综合成一份针对每个阶段的卫生公平考虑因素清单。结果:我们确定了以卫生公平为重点的5个实施框架。指导方针因框架类型而异:决定因素(解释影响实施结果的因素)、过程(将研究转化为实践)或评估(评估实施)。共同特点包括将实施工作重点放在历史上经历过卫生不平等的人群身上,并使干预措施适应当地情况。流程模型还强调了社区伙伴关系的重要性。讨论:总体而言,框架提供了适用于种群遗传筛查项目实施的广泛建议。然而,在为群体遗传筛选的后期阶段提供指导方面仍然存在差距。为了提高基因筛查的公平实施,未来的项目可能会受益于利用这些框架中的一个或多个,或者通过纳入本分析中汇编的健康公平考虑和结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What is improvement science, and what makes it different? An outline of the field and its frontiers. Improving the health of the rural population in India through bundling WASH practices. Patient-reported outcome measures to deliver patient and family-centered care in pediatrics: the ball is now in our court. The power and pain of words: how language matters in responding to patients after harm. The impact of centralization on structural changes in healthcare: when it works.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1