{"title":"Non-Invasive Ventilation in Acute Asthma Exacerbations: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Collin Homer-Bouthiette, Kevin C Wilson","doi":"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202407-799OC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Multiple clinical practice guidelines lack recommendations pertaining to non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in acute asthma exacerbations due to a paucity of evidence. However, the evidence syntheses for these guidelines were performed years ago and more recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies have been published.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Update the evidence syntheses from previous guidelines to further clarify the effects of NIV in acute asthma exacerbations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library was conducted, studies comparing NIV plus standard medical therapy to standard medical therapy alone in adults with acute asthma exacerbation were selected using a priori selection criteria, and relevant data were extracted. Weighted aggregation (meta-analysis) was performed to summarize effects, which were appraised using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight RCTs and five observational studies were selected. NIV was associated with a reduced intubation rate (RCTs RR 0.46, CI 0.16-1.29 and observational studies RR 0.55, CI 0.45-0.68), admission rate (RR 0.57, CI 0.34-0.98), and time to improvement in accessory muscle use (Mean difference -1.13 hours, CI -1.28 - -0.99). Additional outcomes favored NIV plus standard medical therapy but didn't reach statistical significance including dyspnea measures and spirometry measures. There were too few deaths to reliably assess mortality. The quality of evidence ranged from low to very low for all outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All statistically significant outcomes favored NIV plus standard medical therapy over standard medical therapy alone in adults with acute asthma exacerbation. Our aggregate data suggests that intubation rate may be reduced with NIV plus SMT, though the overall quality of the evidence is low. If this is a true effect, it may be clinically important because intubation has been shown to correlate with mortality in multiple observational trials. Given these findings, patients with acute asthma exacerbations may benefit from a trial of NIV in addition to standard medical therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":93876,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202407-799OC","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Rationale: Multiple clinical practice guidelines lack recommendations pertaining to non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in acute asthma exacerbations due to a paucity of evidence. However, the evidence syntheses for these guidelines were performed years ago and more recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies have been published.
Objective: Update the evidence syntheses from previous guidelines to further clarify the effects of NIV in acute asthma exacerbations.
Methods: A systematic search of Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library was conducted, studies comparing NIV plus standard medical therapy to standard medical therapy alone in adults with acute asthma exacerbation were selected using a priori selection criteria, and relevant data were extracted. Weighted aggregation (meta-analysis) was performed to summarize effects, which were appraised using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach.
Results: Eight RCTs and five observational studies were selected. NIV was associated with a reduced intubation rate (RCTs RR 0.46, CI 0.16-1.29 and observational studies RR 0.55, CI 0.45-0.68), admission rate (RR 0.57, CI 0.34-0.98), and time to improvement in accessory muscle use (Mean difference -1.13 hours, CI -1.28 - -0.99). Additional outcomes favored NIV plus standard medical therapy but didn't reach statistical significance including dyspnea measures and spirometry measures. There were too few deaths to reliably assess mortality. The quality of evidence ranged from low to very low for all outcomes.
Conclusion: All statistically significant outcomes favored NIV plus standard medical therapy over standard medical therapy alone in adults with acute asthma exacerbation. Our aggregate data suggests that intubation rate may be reduced with NIV plus SMT, though the overall quality of the evidence is low. If this is a true effect, it may be clinically important because intubation has been shown to correlate with mortality in multiple observational trials. Given these findings, patients with acute asthma exacerbations may benefit from a trial of NIV in addition to standard medical therapy.