Non-Invasive Ventilation in Acute Asthma Exacerbations: A Systematic Review.

Collin Homer-Bouthiette, Kevin C Wilson
{"title":"Non-Invasive Ventilation in Acute Asthma Exacerbations: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Collin Homer-Bouthiette, Kevin C Wilson","doi":"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202407-799OC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Multiple clinical practice guidelines lack recommendations pertaining to non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in acute asthma exacerbations due to a paucity of evidence. However, the evidence syntheses for these guidelines were performed years ago and more recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies have been published.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Update the evidence syntheses from previous guidelines to further clarify the effects of NIV in acute asthma exacerbations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library was conducted, studies comparing NIV plus standard medical therapy to standard medical therapy alone in adults with acute asthma exacerbation were selected using a priori selection criteria, and relevant data were extracted. Weighted aggregation (meta-analysis) was performed to summarize effects, which were appraised using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight RCTs and five observational studies were selected. NIV was associated with a reduced intubation rate (RCTs RR 0.46, CI 0.16-1.29 and observational studies RR 0.55, CI 0.45-0.68), admission rate (RR 0.57, CI 0.34-0.98), and time to improvement in accessory muscle use (Mean difference -1.13 hours, CI -1.28 - -0.99). Additional outcomes favored NIV plus standard medical therapy but didn't reach statistical significance including dyspnea measures and spirometry measures. There were too few deaths to reliably assess mortality. The quality of evidence ranged from low to very low for all outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All statistically significant outcomes favored NIV plus standard medical therapy over standard medical therapy alone in adults with acute asthma exacerbation. Our aggregate data suggests that intubation rate may be reduced with NIV plus SMT, though the overall quality of the evidence is low. If this is a true effect, it may be clinically important because intubation has been shown to correlate with mortality in multiple observational trials. Given these findings, patients with acute asthma exacerbations may benefit from a trial of NIV in addition to standard medical therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":93876,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202407-799OC","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale: Multiple clinical practice guidelines lack recommendations pertaining to non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in acute asthma exacerbations due to a paucity of evidence. However, the evidence syntheses for these guidelines were performed years ago and more recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies have been published.

Objective: Update the evidence syntheses from previous guidelines to further clarify the effects of NIV in acute asthma exacerbations.

Methods: A systematic search of Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library was conducted, studies comparing NIV plus standard medical therapy to standard medical therapy alone in adults with acute asthma exacerbation were selected using a priori selection criteria, and relevant data were extracted. Weighted aggregation (meta-analysis) was performed to summarize effects, which were appraised using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach.

Results: Eight RCTs and five observational studies were selected. NIV was associated with a reduced intubation rate (RCTs RR 0.46, CI 0.16-1.29 and observational studies RR 0.55, CI 0.45-0.68), admission rate (RR 0.57, CI 0.34-0.98), and time to improvement in accessory muscle use (Mean difference -1.13 hours, CI -1.28 - -0.99). Additional outcomes favored NIV plus standard medical therapy but didn't reach statistical significance including dyspnea measures and spirometry measures. There were too few deaths to reliably assess mortality. The quality of evidence ranged from low to very low for all outcomes.

Conclusion: All statistically significant outcomes favored NIV plus standard medical therapy over standard medical therapy alone in adults with acute asthma exacerbation. Our aggregate data suggests that intubation rate may be reduced with NIV plus SMT, though the overall quality of the evidence is low. If this is a true effect, it may be clinically important because intubation has been shown to correlate with mortality in multiple observational trials. Given these findings, patients with acute asthma exacerbations may benefit from a trial of NIV in addition to standard medical therapy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Deep Learning for Predicting Acute Exacerbation and Mortality of Interstitial Lung Disease. Incidence of Pulmonary Hypertension in the Echocardiography Referral Population. Multimorbidity and Its Impact in Older United States Veterans Newly Treated for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Pretreatment Chest X-ray Scores and HIV Serostatus Are Associated with Lung function at TB Cure. Stakeholder Perspectives on Categorizing Care Settings for Measures of Hospital- and Institution-free Days.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1