Perspectives of healthcare professionals on cross-sectoral collaboration between mental health centers and municipalities: A qualitative study.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY International Journal of Social Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-12-07 DOI:10.1177/00207640241299387
Kim Jørgensen, Rikke Juhl, Morten Hansen, Birgitte Lerbæk, Jesper Frederiksen, Emma Watson, Merete Bjerrum, Bengt Karlsson
{"title":"Perspectives of healthcare professionals on cross-sectoral collaboration between mental health centers and municipalities: A qualitative study.","authors":"Kim Jørgensen, Rikke Juhl, Morten Hansen, Birgitte Lerbæk, Jesper Frederiksen, Emma Watson, Merete Bjerrum, Bengt Karlsson","doi":"10.1177/00207640241299387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This paper aims to explore the intricacies of cross-sectoral collaboration in mental health care, focusing on the perspectives of health professionals across various disciplines. It seeks to understand how collaboration can enhance service delivery and patient outcomes while identifying existing challenges.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>The evolving healthcare landscape emphasizes the importance of integrating services across sectors, particularly in mental health care, to improve continuity and efficiency of care.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The study utilizes qualitative methods to investigate health professionals' experiences with cross-sectoral collaboration in mental health services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Purposive sampling was used to select 21 health professionals for focus group discussions held at a mental health center in Region Zealand, Denmark. Data was collected through these discussions, and content analysis was performed to extract key themes. The data collection took place in 2022.</p><p><strong>Results/findings: </strong>Health professionals recognized the potential benefits of cross-sectoral collaboration, such as enhanced service delivery and improved patient outcomes. However, significant barriers were identified, including bureaucratic obstacles, communication gaps, and insufficient organizational support.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cross-sectoral collaboration in mental health care offers significant advantages, but challenges must be addressed to fully realize its potential. Efforts should focus on policy reforms, organizational support, and fostering interdisciplinary communication to improve care delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":14304,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Social Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"207640241299387"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Social Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00207640241299387","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: This paper aims to explore the intricacies of cross-sectoral collaboration in mental health care, focusing on the perspectives of health professionals across various disciplines. It seeks to understand how collaboration can enhance service delivery and patient outcomes while identifying existing challenges.

Background: The evolving healthcare landscape emphasizes the importance of integrating services across sectors, particularly in mental health care, to improve continuity and efficiency of care.

Design: The study utilizes qualitative methods to investigate health professionals' experiences with cross-sectoral collaboration in mental health services.

Methods: Purposive sampling was used to select 21 health professionals for focus group discussions held at a mental health center in Region Zealand, Denmark. Data was collected through these discussions, and content analysis was performed to extract key themes. The data collection took place in 2022.

Results/findings: Health professionals recognized the potential benefits of cross-sectoral collaboration, such as enhanced service delivery and improved patient outcomes. However, significant barriers were identified, including bureaucratic obstacles, communication gaps, and insufficient organizational support.

Conclusion: Cross-sectoral collaboration in mental health care offers significant advantages, but challenges must be addressed to fully realize its potential. Efforts should focus on policy reforms, organizational support, and fostering interdisciplinary communication to improve care delivery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卫生保健专业人员对精神卫生中心和市政当局之间跨部门合作的看法:一项定性研究。
目的:本文旨在探讨精神卫生保健跨部门合作的复杂性,重点关注不同学科卫生专业人员的观点。该项目旨在了解合作如何在确定现有挑战的同时,提高服务提供和患者治疗效果。背景:不断变化的医疗保健格局强调了跨部门整合服务的重要性,特别是在精神卫生保健方面,以提高护理的连续性和效率。设计:本研究采用定性方法调查卫生专业人员在精神卫生服务跨部门合作方面的经验。方法:采用有目的抽样的方法,选取21名卫生专业人员参加在丹麦新西兰地区一家精神卫生中心举行的焦点小组讨论。通过这些讨论收集数据,并进行内容分析以提取关键主题。数据收集于2022年进行。结果/发现:卫生专业人员认识到跨部门协作的潜在好处,例如加强服务提供和改善患者治疗结果。然而,我们发现了重大的障碍,包括官僚主义障碍、沟通差距和组织支持不足。结论:精神卫生保健跨部门合作具有显著优势,但要充分发挥其潜力,必须应对挑战。努力应侧重于政策改革、组织支持和促进跨学科交流,以改善护理服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
1.30%
发文量
120
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Social Psychiatry, established in 1954, is a leading publication dedicated to the field of social psychiatry. It serves as a platform for the exchange of research findings and discussions on the influence of social, environmental, and cultural factors on mental health and well-being. The journal is particularly relevant to psychiatrists and multidisciplinary professionals globally who are interested in understanding the broader context of psychiatric disorders and their impact on individuals and communities. Social psychiatry, as a discipline, focuses on the origins and outcomes of mental health issues within a social framework, recognizing the interplay between societal structures and individual mental health. The journal draws connections with related fields such as social anthropology, cultural psychiatry, and sociology, and is influenced by the latest developments in these areas. The journal also places a special emphasis on fast-track publication for brief communications, ensuring that timely and significant research can be disseminated quickly. Additionally, it strives to reflect its international readership by publishing state-of-the-art reviews from various regions around the world, showcasing the diverse practices and perspectives within the psychiatric disciplines. This approach not only contributes to the scientific understanding of social psychiatry but also supports the global exchange of knowledge and best practices in mental health care.
期刊最新文献
Discontinuity of psychiatric care among patients with bipolar disorder in the Netherlands. Factors predicting employment status among persons with schizophrenia: A cross-sectional study from Chennai, India. Suicidal behaviors among high school graduates with preexisting mental health problems: A machine learning and GIS-based study. Suicide among adolescents in Brazil in times of pandemic: A perspective. The impact of the 2023 Türkiye-Syria earthquakes on the mental health of children.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1