A potential therapeutic strategy using a miniature, implantable, wireless nerve stimulation device for treating stress urinary incontinence in rats.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY International Urology and Nephrology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-06 DOI:10.1007/s11255-024-04318-9
Bohong Long, Chen Li, Han Deng, Haoyu Sun, Limin Liao, Xing Li
{"title":"A potential therapeutic strategy using a miniature, implantable, wireless nerve stimulation device for treating stress urinary incontinence in rats.","authors":"Bohong Long, Chen Li, Han Deng, Haoyu Sun, Limin Liao, Xing Li","doi":"10.1007/s11255-024-04318-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The present study examined the effects of a miniature, implantable, wireless stimulation device for treating stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in rats.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-four female Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly assigned to three groups: Group 1 (Control), Group 2 (Sham), and Group 3 (Stimulation). All animals underwent vaginal distension (VD) to mimic postpartum SUI. Groups 2 and 3 were implanted with a stimulator in the pelvic floor muscle, but only Group 3 received continuous stimulation for two weeks. Multiple cystometrograms (CMGs) were performed to determine the leak point pressure (LPP) and maximal bladder capacity (MBC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the rat model, LPP in Group 1 after VD and after two weeks decreased significantly from baseline (21.1 ± 2.5 and 30.8 ± 5.2 vs. 52.5 ± 6.3 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, P < 0.001). LPP improved after two weeks compared to after VD (P < 0.01), but did not return to baseline. In Group 2, LPP at baseline, after VD, and after two weeks were 50.8 ± 4.9, 23.1 ± 6.3, and 31.5 ± 6.9 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, respectively, showing similar changes to Group 1. In Group 3, LPP values were 48.4 ± 4.8, 17.8 ± 3.9, and 48.4 ± 8.5 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, with significant improvement after two weeks compared to after VD (P < 0.001), returning to baseline. MBC showed no significant differences across conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current study demonstrated the effectiveness of the implantable stimulation device for treating SUI in a rat model. Further studies are needed to determine its long-term safety and action mechanism.</p>","PeriodicalId":14454,"journal":{"name":"International Urology and Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":"1311-1318"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urology and Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-024-04318-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The present study examined the effects of a miniature, implantable, wireless stimulation device for treating stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in rats.

Methods: Twenty-four female Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly assigned to three groups: Group 1 (Control), Group 2 (Sham), and Group 3 (Stimulation). All animals underwent vaginal distension (VD) to mimic postpartum SUI. Groups 2 and 3 were implanted with a stimulator in the pelvic floor muscle, but only Group 3 received continuous stimulation for two weeks. Multiple cystometrograms (CMGs) were performed to determine the leak point pressure (LPP) and maximal bladder capacity (MBC).

Results: In the rat model, LPP in Group 1 after VD and after two weeks decreased significantly from baseline (21.1 ± 2.5 and 30.8 ± 5.2 vs. 52.5 ± 6.3 cmH2O, P < 0.001). LPP improved after two weeks compared to after VD (P < 0.01), but did not return to baseline. In Group 2, LPP at baseline, after VD, and after two weeks were 50.8 ± 4.9, 23.1 ± 6.3, and 31.5 ± 6.9 cmH2O, respectively, showing similar changes to Group 1. In Group 3, LPP values were 48.4 ± 4.8, 17.8 ± 3.9, and 48.4 ± 8.5 cmH2O, with significant improvement after two weeks compared to after VD (P < 0.001), returning to baseline. MBC showed no significant differences across conditions.

Conclusions: The current study demonstrated the effectiveness of the implantable stimulation device for treating SUI in a rat model. Further studies are needed to determine its long-term safety and action mechanism.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一个潜在的治疗策略使用微型,植入式,无线神经刺激装置治疗应激性尿失禁的大鼠。
目的:研究微型可植入无线刺激装置治疗应激性尿失禁(SUI)的效果。方法:24只雌性Sprague-Dawley大鼠随机分为3组:1组(对照组)、2组(假手术组)、3组(刺激组)。所有动物均进行阴道扩张(VD)以模拟产后SUI。第2组和第3组在盆底肌内植入刺激器,只有第3组持续刺激2周。多重膀胱造影(CMGs)测定泄漏点压力(LPP)和最大膀胱容量(MBC)。结果:在大鼠模型中,VD后和2周后1组LPP较基线(分别为21.1±2.5和30.8±5.2 vs. 52.5±6.3 cmH2O, p2o)显著降低,变化与1组相似。第3组LPP值分别为48.4±4.8、17.8±3.9和48.4±8.5 cmH2O,两周后较VD后显著改善(P)。结论:本研究证实了植入式刺激装置治疗SUI大鼠模型的有效性。需要进一步的研究来确定其长期安全性和作用机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Urology and Nephrology
International Urology and Nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
329
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: International Urology and Nephrology publishes original papers on a broad range of topics in urology, nephrology and andrology. The journal integrates papers originating from clinical practice.
期刊最新文献
Dialysis versus conservative kidney management in older adults: why one size does not fit all. Incidence and management outcomes of vascular complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Comment on "Ferroptosis-related proteins ALOX15 and HMOX1 are upregulated and associated with inflammation in patients with diabetic nephropathy: a prospective cross-sectional study". Early outcomes of concurrent MACE and Mitrofanoff procedures for management of neuropathic fecal and urinary incontinence in children. Al-Azhar experience. Radiomics as a tool for predicting biochemical recurrence after total prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1