Adherence to Registration and Selective Outcome Reporting in Randomized Clinical Trials Published in Endodontic Journals Over the Past 5 Years: A Meta-Research Study.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of endodontics Pub Date : 2024-12-04 DOI:10.1016/j.joen.2024.12.001
Filipe Colombo Vitali, Pablo Silveira Santos, Aurélio de Oliveira Rocha, Lucianne Cople Maia, Lucas da Fonseca Roberti Garcia, Cleonice da Silveira Teixeira
{"title":"Adherence to Registration and Selective Outcome Reporting in Randomized Clinical Trials Published in Endodontic Journals Over the Past 5 Years: A Meta-Research Study.","authors":"Filipe Colombo Vitali, Pablo Silveira Santos, Aurélio de Oliveira Rocha, Lucianne Cople Maia, Lucas da Fonseca Roberti Garcia, Cleonice da Silveira Teixeira","doi":"10.1016/j.joen.2024.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Prospective registration of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) is highly recommended to ensure research transparency and prevent selective outcome reporting (SOR). This study aimed to evaluate the adherence to registration and the presence of SOR in RCTs published in endodontic journals over the past 5 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic searches were conducted in PubMed and the libraries of the Journal of Endodontics, International Endodontic Journal, European Endodontic Journal, and Australian Endodontic Journal. Two reviewers were involved in the study selection and evaluation. Publications were assessed for key methodological aspects, including the presence and timing of trial registration. RCT registries were examined to identify discrepancies between publication and registered protocols and the presence of SOR. Logistic regression was used to explore the effect of study variables on registration practices and SOR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 144 RCTs included, 104 (72.2%) were registered. Among those registered, only 19 (18.3%) adhered to prospective registration. Registration practice increased by 53% per year (OR 1.53; 95% CI: 1.34-2.08; P < .01). Discrepancies between publication and protocol were identified in 55.8% of studies, primarily related to sample size (33.7%). SOR was identified in 41 trials (39.4%), mainly due to discrepancies in the outcome time frame (18.3%). Studies evaluating multiple outcomes had 4.95 times higher odds of exhibiting SOR (OR 4.95; 95% CI: 1.63-12.95; P < .01). Furthermore, studies that were registered retrospectively or exhibited discrepancies between publication and protocol accounted for 6.10 times (OR 6.10; 95% CI: 1.81-18.96; P = .03) and 5.61 times (OR 5.61; 95% CI: 2.93-16.58; P < .01) higher odds of exhibiting SOR, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RCTs published in endodontic journals over the past 5 years presented low adherence to prospective trial registration and a high prevalence of SOR.</p>","PeriodicalId":15703,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endodontics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2024.12.001","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Prospective registration of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) is highly recommended to ensure research transparency and prevent selective outcome reporting (SOR). This study aimed to evaluate the adherence to registration and the presence of SOR in RCTs published in endodontic journals over the past 5 years.

Methods: Electronic searches were conducted in PubMed and the libraries of the Journal of Endodontics, International Endodontic Journal, European Endodontic Journal, and Australian Endodontic Journal. Two reviewers were involved in the study selection and evaluation. Publications were assessed for key methodological aspects, including the presence and timing of trial registration. RCT registries were examined to identify discrepancies between publication and registered protocols and the presence of SOR. Logistic regression was used to explore the effect of study variables on registration practices and SOR.

Results: Of the 144 RCTs included, 104 (72.2%) were registered. Among those registered, only 19 (18.3%) adhered to prospective registration. Registration practice increased by 53% per year (OR 1.53; 95% CI: 1.34-2.08; P < .01). Discrepancies between publication and protocol were identified in 55.8% of studies, primarily related to sample size (33.7%). SOR was identified in 41 trials (39.4%), mainly due to discrepancies in the outcome time frame (18.3%). Studies evaluating multiple outcomes had 4.95 times higher odds of exhibiting SOR (OR 4.95; 95% CI: 1.63-12.95; P < .01). Furthermore, studies that were registered retrospectively or exhibited discrepancies between publication and protocol accounted for 6.10 times (OR 6.10; 95% CI: 1.81-18.96; P = .03) and 5.61 times (OR 5.61; 95% CI: 2.93-16.58; P < .01) higher odds of exhibiting SOR, respectively.

Conclusions: RCTs published in endodontic journals over the past 5 years presented low adherence to prospective trial registration and a high prevalence of SOR.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在过去的5年中,在牙髓学期刊上发表的随机临床试验中,坚持注册和选择性结果报告:一项荟萃研究。
导读:强烈建议前瞻性注册随机临床试验(rct),以确保研究透明度和防止选择性结果报告(SOR)。本研究旨在评估过去五年在牙髓学期刊上发表的随机对照试验中注册的依从性和SOR的存在。方法:在PubMed和《牙髓学杂志》、《国际牙髓学杂志》、《欧洲牙髓学杂志》和《澳大利亚牙髓学杂志》图书馆中进行电子检索。两名审稿人参与了研究的选择和评估。对出版物进行了关键方法学方面的评估,包括试验注册的存在和时间。检查RCT注册库,以确定发表和注册方案之间的差异以及SOR的存在。采用Logistic回归探讨研究变量对注册实践和SOR的影响。结果:纳入的144项随机对照试验中,登记104项(72.2%)。在注册的患者中,只有19例(18.3%)坚持前瞻性注册。注册业务每年增长53% (OR 1.53;95%置信区间:1.34—-2.08;结论:过去5年发表在牙髓学期刊上的随机对照试验显示前瞻性试验注册的依从性较低,SOR的患病率较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of endodontics
Journal of endodontics 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
224
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Endodontics, the official journal of the American Association of Endodontists, publishes scientific articles, case reports and comparison studies evaluating materials and methods of pulp conservation and endodontic treatment. Endodontists and general dentists can learn about new concepts in root canal treatment and the latest advances in techniques and instrumentation in the one journal that helps them keep pace with rapid changes in this field.
期刊最新文献
Impact of wine polyphenols on the inflammatory profile of induced apical periodontitis in rats. Five-year Outcomes of Root Canal Treatment Comparing Sealer-based Obturation with Calcium Silicate-based Sealer to Continuous Wave of Condensation: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Postoperative pain following the use of the TruNatomy and XP-endo Shaper systems: A randomized clinical study. ASSOCIATION BETWEEN APICAL PERIODONTITIS AND AUTOIMMUNE DISEASES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW WITH META-ANALYSIS. Development of antimicrobial peptide-loaded hydrogels as potential scaffolds for pulp-dentine complex regeneration: A comparative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1