Occurrence of Auditory Impairments in Individuals With Dysphonia: A Scoping Review.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Journal of Voice Pub Date : 2024-12-06 DOI:10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.11.021
Maxsuel Alves Avelino de Paiva, Luiz de Medeiros de Araújo Lima-Filho, Francisco Tiago Meireles da Silva, Leonardo Wanderley Lopes
{"title":"Occurrence of Auditory Impairments in Individuals With Dysphonia: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Maxsuel Alves Avelino de Paiva, Luiz de Medeiros de Araújo Lima-Filho, Francisco Tiago Meireles da Silva, Leonardo Wanderley Lopes","doi":"10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.11.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the occurrence of auditory impairments in individuals with dysphonia and to describe the results of behavioral and electrophysiological audiological assessments in this population.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A scoping review.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A scoping review following the guidelines of the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Evidence Synthesis for Scoping Reviews and PRISMA-ScR. A search was carried out using the electronic databases PubMed, Scielo, and Lilacs, as well as the gray literature via Google Scholar. Using the Rayyan platform, the selection and extraction of data from the studies was carried out independently and blindly by two reviewers, with excellent agreement. The studies included in the review were subjected to extraction of the following information for analysis: authors, year of publication, objective, sample characteristics, dysphonia classification, audiological assessment procedure, and conclusion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About 100 studies were found, and 13 eligible studies were included in the analysis. Of the studies included, 92.3% (n = 12) adopted cross-sectional designs, 76.9% (n = 10) investigated auditory functions in individuals with behavioral dysphonia, and 23.1% (n = 3) with organic dysphonia. The samples consisted of children in 53.8% (n = 7) of the studies and adults in 46.2% (n = 6), both with dysphonia. Around 53.80% (n = 7) of the studies included control groups without dysphonia. As for audiological assessment methods, 53.8% (n = 7) used behavioral tests of central auditory processing, 15.4% (n = 2) electrophysiological assessment, and 30.8% (n = 4) a combination of both.</p><p><strong>Conclusion-: </strong>Individuals with dysphonia, especially of the behavioral type, may have deficits in auditory function. The main impairments refer to central auditory processing, especially in skills involving temporal processing, figure-ground skills, and auditory closure. Electrophysiological assessment does not show any significant differences between individuals with and without behavioral dysphonia. However, the frequency of follow-up response has a potential for greater impairment in this population. In cases of organic dysphonia, small and inconsistent impairments have been found, such as prolonged latencies of auditory potentials.</p>","PeriodicalId":49954,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Voice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Voice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.11.021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To investigate the occurrence of auditory impairments in individuals with dysphonia and to describe the results of behavioral and electrophysiological audiological assessments in this population.

Study design: A scoping review.

Method: A scoping review following the guidelines of the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Evidence Synthesis for Scoping Reviews and PRISMA-ScR. A search was carried out using the electronic databases PubMed, Scielo, and Lilacs, as well as the gray literature via Google Scholar. Using the Rayyan platform, the selection and extraction of data from the studies was carried out independently and blindly by two reviewers, with excellent agreement. The studies included in the review were subjected to extraction of the following information for analysis: authors, year of publication, objective, sample characteristics, dysphonia classification, audiological assessment procedure, and conclusion.

Results: About 100 studies were found, and 13 eligible studies were included in the analysis. Of the studies included, 92.3% (n = 12) adopted cross-sectional designs, 76.9% (n = 10) investigated auditory functions in individuals with behavioral dysphonia, and 23.1% (n = 3) with organic dysphonia. The samples consisted of children in 53.8% (n = 7) of the studies and adults in 46.2% (n = 6), both with dysphonia. Around 53.80% (n = 7) of the studies included control groups without dysphonia. As for audiological assessment methods, 53.8% (n = 7) used behavioral tests of central auditory processing, 15.4% (n = 2) electrophysiological assessment, and 30.8% (n = 4) a combination of both.

Conclusion-: Individuals with dysphonia, especially of the behavioral type, may have deficits in auditory function. The main impairments refer to central auditory processing, especially in skills involving temporal processing, figure-ground skills, and auditory closure. Electrophysiological assessment does not show any significant differences between individuals with and without behavioral dysphonia. However, the frequency of follow-up response has a potential for greater impairment in this population. In cases of organic dysphonia, small and inconsistent impairments have been found, such as prolonged latencies of auditory potentials.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
语音障碍患者听觉障碍的发生:一项范围综述。
目的:探讨语音障碍患者的听觉障碍发生情况,并描述该人群的行为和电生理听力学评估结果。研究设计:范围审查。方法:根据乔安娜布里格斯研究所证据合成手册和prism - scr的指南进行范围审查。使用PubMed、Scielo和Lilacs电子数据库进行检索,并通过谷歌Scholar进行灰色文献检索。使用Rayyan平台,研究数据的选择和提取是由两位审稿人独立和盲目地进行的,并且非常一致。对纳入本综述的研究提取以下信息进行分析:作者、发表年份、目的、样本特征、发音障碍分类、听力学评估程序和结论。结果:共发现约100项研究,13项符合条件的研究纳入分析。在纳入的研究中,92.3% (n = 12)采用了横断面设计,76.9% (n = 10)研究了行为性发声障碍患者的听觉功能,23.1% (n = 3)研究了器质性发声障碍患者的听觉功能。研究样本中儿童占53.8% (n = 7),成人占46.2% (n = 6),均患有语音障碍。约53.80% (n = 7)的研究包括无发声障碍的对照组。在听力学评估方法方面,53.8% (n = 7)采用中枢性听觉处理行为测试,15.4% (n = 2)采用电生理评估,30.8% (n = 4)采用两者联合评估。结论:患有语音障碍的个体,尤其是行为型的,可能有听觉功能缺陷。主要的损伤涉及中枢听觉处理,特别是涉及时间处理、图形背景技能和听觉关闭的技能。电生理评估在有和没有行为障碍的个体之间没有显示任何显著差异。然而,随访反应的频率有可能在这一人群中造成更大的损害。在器质性发声障碍的病例中,发现了小而不一致的损伤,例如听觉电位的延迟延长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Voice
Journal of Voice 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.60%
发文量
395
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Voice is widely regarded as the world''s premiere journal for voice medicine and research. This peer-reviewed publication is listed in Index Medicus and is indexed by the Institute for Scientific Information. The journal contains articles written by experts throughout the world on all topics in voice sciences, voice medicine and surgery, and speech-language pathologists'' management of voice-related problems. The journal includes clinical articles, clinical research, and laboratory research. Members of the Foundation receive the journal as a benefit of membership.
期刊最新文献
Self-Perception of Voice at Different Moments and Hospitalization for COVID-19: The Influence of Sociodemographic and Clinical Variables. Blood Lactate as a Metabolic Biomarker of Anaerobic Vocal Capacity: A Pilot Study. Efficacy of Voice Therapy for Vocal Fold Masses: Avoidance of Surgery. Correlation Between Self-Perceived Hoarseness, Perceptual Voice Evaluation, and Body Mass Index in Dysphonic Patients: A Study of 120 Cases. The Efficacy of Superior Laryngeal Nerve Block for Chronic Cough: A Scoping Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1