Physicians' perception of guideline recommendations for the treatment of resistant hypertension by renal denervation: Resistant Hypertension Working Group, Argentine Hypertension Society.

IF 1.2 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Hipertension y Riesgo Vascular Pub Date : 2024-12-06 DOI:10.1016/j.hipert.2024.10.003
N F Renna, L Brandani, R Parodi, C Kottliar, E Ylarri, G Lavenia, M Marin, M Ruise, R Sanchez, D Cianfagna, G Botvinik, P Rumi, V Ferreti, P Rodirguez
{"title":"Physicians' perception of guideline recommendations for the treatment of resistant hypertension by renal denervation: Resistant Hypertension Working Group, Argentine Hypertension Society.","authors":"N F Renna, L Brandani, R Parodi, C Kottliar, E Ylarri, G Lavenia, M Marin, M Ruise, R Sanchez, D Cianfagna, G Botvinik, P Rumi, V Ferreti, P Rodirguez","doi":"10.1016/j.hipert.2024.10.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study investigates the perceptions and knowledge of specialized Argentine physicians regarding renal denervation (RDN) as a treatment for resistant hypertension (R-HT).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A survey was conducted among 206 physicians, mainly cardiologists and internists, to assess their awareness and perceptions of RDN. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Spearman's Rho correlation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey revealed that 83% of the responders are aware of RDN. Despite this high awareness, only 60% believe in its safety, while 33.2% are uncertain, and 6.8% consider it unsafe. Significant correlations were found between the awareness of RDN and perceptions of its efficacy and safety.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study highlights a gap between knowledge and confidence in RDN among specialized Argentine physicians. Continuous education and shared decision-making are crucial to improve the adoption of RDN in clinical practice. Long-term safety and efficacy data support RDN as a valuable tool for managing R-HT. Addressing safety concerns through targeted educational initiatives is essential.</p>","PeriodicalId":39403,"journal":{"name":"Hipertension y Riesgo Vascular","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hipertension y Riesgo Vascular","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hipert.2024.10.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study investigates the perceptions and knowledge of specialized Argentine physicians regarding renal denervation (RDN) as a treatment for resistant hypertension (R-HT).

Method: A survey was conducted among 206 physicians, mainly cardiologists and internists, to assess their awareness and perceptions of RDN. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Spearman's Rho correlation.

Results: The survey revealed that 83% of the responders are aware of RDN. Despite this high awareness, only 60% believe in its safety, while 33.2% are uncertain, and 6.8% consider it unsafe. Significant correlations were found between the awareness of RDN and perceptions of its efficacy and safety.

Conclusions: The study highlights a gap between knowledge and confidence in RDN among specialized Argentine physicians. Continuous education and shared decision-making are crucial to improve the adoption of RDN in clinical practice. Long-term safety and efficacy data support RDN as a valuable tool for managing R-HT. Addressing safety concerns through targeted educational initiatives is essential.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医生对肾去神经支配治疗顽固性高血压的指南建议的看法:阿根廷高血压学会顽固性高血压工作组。
简介:本研究调查了阿根廷专业医生对肾去神经支配(RDN)作为顽固性高血压(R-HT)治疗的认知和知识。方法:对206名内科医生(主要是心脏科医生和内科医生)进行调查,了解他们对RDN的认识和看法。数据分析采用描述性统计和Spearman’s Rho相关。结果:调查显示83%的应答者知道RDN。尽管有很高的认知度,但只有60%的人相信它的安全性,33.2%的人不确定,6.8%的人认为它不安全。对RDN的认知与对其有效性和安全性的认知之间存在显著的相关性。结论:该研究突出了阿根廷专业医生对RDN的知识和信心之间的差距。持续教育和共同决策对于提高临床实践中RDN的采用至关重要。长期安全性和有效性数据支持RDN作为治疗R-HT的宝贵工具。通过有针对性的教育举措解决安全问题至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hipertension y Riesgo Vascular
Hipertension y Riesgo Vascular Medicine-Internal Medicine
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
38
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: La mejor publicación para mantenerse al día en los avances de la lucha contra esta patología. Incluye artículos de Investigación, Originales, Revisiones, Casos clínicos, Aplicación práctica y Resúmenes comentados a la bibliografía internacional. Además, es la Publicación Oficial de la Sociedad española de Hipertensión-Liga Española para la Lucha contra la Hipertensión Arterial.
期刊最新文献
The predictive value of CRP/albumin ratio (CAR) in the diagnosis of ischemia in myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. Hypertension and uric acid, uric acid and hypertension: Is hyperuricaemia a new vascular risk factor to take into account? Refractory arterial hypertension. What can we offer these patients? Trastornos hipertensivos de novo en el posparto: consideraciones sobre su diagnóstico, factores de riesgo y posibles estrategias de intervención Metastatic pheochromocytoma: An unusual case and its multidisciplinary management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1