Predictive Factors of Short Inpatient Stay Following Total Knee Replacement.

IF 1.5 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY Musculoskeletal Care Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1002/msc.70022
Zi Qiang Glen Liau, Jonathan Zhi Kai Toh, Lakshmanan Sathappan, Yau Hong Ng
{"title":"Predictive Factors of Short Inpatient Stay Following Total Knee Replacement.","authors":"Zi Qiang Glen Liau, Jonathan Zhi Kai Toh, Lakshmanan Sathappan, Yau Hong Ng","doi":"10.1002/msc.70022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocols adopt a multidisciplinary approach in perioperative care to reduce Length of Stay (LOS). This study aims to identify predictive factors resulting in short-stay following TKR with an ERAS programme.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis was performed on a consecutive series of patients who underwent unilateral TKR by a single surgeon in a tertiary institution between August 2019 and December 2021. Patient demographics, comorbidities and length of stay were collected using Electronic Medical Records. Short-stay was defined as LOS within 1 day or less, while standard-stay was defined as LOS exceeding 2 days or more. Statistical analysis was performed using R version 4.3.1. Logistic regression was performed for multivariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-nine patients were included in the study, comprising 45 short-stay patients and 54 standard-stay patients. Short-stay patients were significantly younger (mean 66.1, 95% CI [64.5, 67.7], p = 0.0212) than standard-stay patients (mean 69.2, 95% CI [67.1, 71.2]). There was a significantly lower mean BMI among short-stay patients (26.98, 95% CI [25.52, 28.45], p = 0.021) than among standard-stay patients (29.31, 95% CI [27.96, 30.66]). A significantly higher proportion of short-stay patients (84.4%, 95% CI [73.4, 95.5], p = 0.00132) were premorbid community ambulant without aids than standard-stay patients (51.9%, 95% CI [38.1, 65.6]). There was no significant difference in sex, race, smoking, American Society of Anaesthesiologists score and Charlson Comorbidity Index (p > 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression revealed the following significant factors: Age < 75 (p = 0.0293), BMI < 25 (p = 0.00688), and premorbid community ambulant without aids (p = 0.0402).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In conclusion, predictive factors for short-stay after TKR include age < 75, BMI < 25 and being premorbid community ambulant without aids.</p>","PeriodicalId":46945,"journal":{"name":"Musculoskeletal Care","volume":"22 4","pages":"e70022"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Musculoskeletal Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.70022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocols adopt a multidisciplinary approach in perioperative care to reduce Length of Stay (LOS). This study aims to identify predictive factors resulting in short-stay following TKR with an ERAS programme.

Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed on a consecutive series of patients who underwent unilateral TKR by a single surgeon in a tertiary institution between August 2019 and December 2021. Patient demographics, comorbidities and length of stay were collected using Electronic Medical Records. Short-stay was defined as LOS within 1 day or less, while standard-stay was defined as LOS exceeding 2 days or more. Statistical analysis was performed using R version 4.3.1. Logistic regression was performed for multivariate analysis.

Results: Ninety-nine patients were included in the study, comprising 45 short-stay patients and 54 standard-stay patients. Short-stay patients were significantly younger (mean 66.1, 95% CI [64.5, 67.7], p = 0.0212) than standard-stay patients (mean 69.2, 95% CI [67.1, 71.2]). There was a significantly lower mean BMI among short-stay patients (26.98, 95% CI [25.52, 28.45], p = 0.021) than among standard-stay patients (29.31, 95% CI [27.96, 30.66]). A significantly higher proportion of short-stay patients (84.4%, 95% CI [73.4, 95.5], p = 0.00132) were premorbid community ambulant without aids than standard-stay patients (51.9%, 95% CI [38.1, 65.6]). There was no significant difference in sex, race, smoking, American Society of Anaesthesiologists score and Charlson Comorbidity Index (p > 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression revealed the following significant factors: Age < 75 (p = 0.0293), BMI < 25 (p = 0.00688), and premorbid community ambulant without aids (p = 0.0402).

Conclusions: In conclusion, predictive factors for short-stay after TKR include age < 75, BMI < 25 and being premorbid community ambulant without aids.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全膝关节置换术后短期住院的预测因素。
简介:增强术后恢复(ERAS)协议在围手术期护理中采用多学科方法来减少住院时间(LOS)。本研究旨在通过ERAS计划确定导致TKR后短期住院的预测因素。方法:回顾性分析2019年8月至2021年12月在某高等教育机构由一名外科医生连续行单侧TKR的患者。使用电子病历收集患者人口统计资料、合并症和住院时间。短期停留定义为1天以内的停留时间,标准停留定义为2天以上的停留时间。采用R 4.3.1版本进行统计分析。采用Logistic回归进行多因素分析。结果:99例患者纳入研究,其中短期住院患者45例,标准住院患者54例。短期住院患者明显比标准住院患者年轻(平均66.1,95% CI [64.5, 67.7], p = 0.0212)(平均69.2,95% CI[67.1, 71.2])。短期住院患者的平均BMI (26.98, 95% CI [25.52, 28.45], p = 0.021)明显低于标准住院患者(29.31,95% CI[27.96, 30.66])。短住院患者(84.4%,95% CI [73.4, 95.5], p = 0.00132)发病前无辅助的社区门诊患者比例明显高于标准住院患者(51.9%,95% CI[38.1, 65.6])。性别、种族、吸烟、美国麻醉医师学会评分、Charlson合病指数差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。结论:TKR术后短期住院的预测因素包括年龄
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Musculoskeletal Care
Musculoskeletal Care RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
88
期刊介绍: Musculoskeletal Care is a peer-reviewed journal for all health professionals committed to the clinical delivery of high quality care for people with musculoskeletal conditions and providing knowledge to support decision making by professionals, patients and policy makers. This journal publishes papers on original research, applied research, review articles and clinical guidelines. Regular topics include patient education, psychological and social impact, patient experiences of health care, clinical up dates and the effectiveness of therapy.
期刊最新文献
Pain Catastrophizing Is Associated With Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Hip Osteoarthritis: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study. Gaps in Evidence-Based Recommendations for Low Back Pain: Analysis of the Accuracy of the Care Pathway in Primary Care. Knee-Related Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Young Adults: A Scoping Meta-Review. Effect of Motivational Interviewing and Exercise on Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Perspectives of UK Physiotherapists With Expertise in Rheumatology on the Barriers and Facilitators Influencing the Identification of Axial Spondyloarthritis by First Contact Practitioners in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1