What, if any, should be the role of doctors in assisted dying?

The BMJ Pub Date : 2024-12-09 DOI:10.1136/bmj.q2726
H Lucy Thomas
{"title":"What, if any, should be the role of doctors in assisted dying?","authors":"H Lucy Thomas","doi":"10.1136/bmj.q2726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The BMJ ’s coverage on assisted dying1 ignores the key question for the medical profession: what, if any, should be the role of doctors? In Leadbeater’s bill our role is central and decisive: not only do medical criteria define what constitutes an acceptable reason to end one’s life, but doctors are both the arbiters and administrators. This has several deeply problematic implications. This bill would legally require doctors to treat a patient …","PeriodicalId":22388,"journal":{"name":"The BMJ","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The BMJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q2726","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The BMJ ’s coverage on assisted dying1 ignores the key question for the medical profession: what, if any, should be the role of doctors? In Leadbeater’s bill our role is central and decisive: not only do medical criteria define what constitutes an acceptable reason to end one’s life, but doctors are both the arbiters and administrators. This has several deeply problematic implications. This bill would legally require doctors to treat a patient …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
如果有的话,医生在协助死亡中应该扮演什么角色?
《英国医学杂志》关于协助死亡的报道忽视了医学界的一个关键问题:如果有的话,医生应该扮演什么角色?在Leadbeater的法案中,我们的角色是核心和决定性的:不仅医学标准定义了什么是可以接受的结束生命的理由,而且医生既是仲裁者又是管理者。这有几个深层次的问题。这项法案将在法律上要求医生治疗病人……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Protecting scientific integrity requires a global and balanced lens. Hope without action is a damaging sedative to the reality of the climate crisis. Waiting lists, emergency department stays, and cancer treatment: After 18 months how is Labour performing on the NHS? Child poverty strategy: Bold commitments and binding targets are essential for health equity. Air pollution: EPA to stop putting price on human health benefits and focus on cost to industry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1