General practitioners' barriers to cross-sectoral collaboration on pregnant women with vulnerabilities: a cross-sectional survey in Danish general practice.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care Pub Date : 2024-12-08 DOI:10.1080/02813432.2024.2432371
Louise Brygger Venø, Line Bjørnskov Pedersen, Jens Søndergaard, Ruth Kirk Ertmann, Dorte Ejg Jarbøl
{"title":"General practitioners' barriers to cross-sectoral collaboration on pregnant women with vulnerabilities: a cross-sectional survey in Danish general practice.","authors":"Louise Brygger Venø, Line Bjørnskov Pedersen, Jens Søndergaard, Ruth Kirk Ertmann, Dorte Ejg Jarbøl","doi":"10.1080/02813432.2024.2432371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pregnancy vulnerability contributes to poor perinatal mental health. Proper cross-sectoral collaboration may mitigate perinatal mental health problems. General practitioners (GPs) often face barriers when assessing pregnancy vulnerability, but little is known about GPs' perceived barriers to the cross-sectoral collaboration on vulnerable pregnant women.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore GPs' barriers to cross-sectoral collaboration on pregnant women with vulnerabilities, and how barriers are associated with the organization of antenatal care (ANC) and general practice characteristics.</p><p><strong>Design, setting and subjects: </strong>A cross-sectional questionnaire study among Danish GPs (<i>n</i> = 3465).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Descriptive statistics according to the Theoretical Domains Framework describes the barriers to collaboration. Analytical statistics with ordered logistic regression models demonstrate associations between selected barriers (the main outcome measures) and organization of ANC, GP and practice, characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 760 GPs (22%) participated. Perceived GP barriers to collaboration were lacking knowledge of ANC levels relevant to vulnerable pregnant women, insufficient information on vulnerability indicators from collaborating parties, heavy workload and insufficient remuneration for collaborative meetings. Being young were associated with insufficient GP knowledge of ANC levels. Old age was associated with less likelihood of experiencing heavy workload as a barrier.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Barriers to collaboration on vulnerable pregnant women were associated with some GP-organizational characteristics including low experience in collaborating with partners in ANC, and GP characteristics, such as age. Reducing general practice workload, e.g. by reorganizing priority areas, releasing more time to vulnerable patients, and improving cross-sectoral information sharing on vulnerability might improve collaboration on vulnerable pregnant women.</p>","PeriodicalId":21521,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2024.2432371","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pregnancy vulnerability contributes to poor perinatal mental health. Proper cross-sectoral collaboration may mitigate perinatal mental health problems. General practitioners (GPs) often face barriers when assessing pregnancy vulnerability, but little is known about GPs' perceived barriers to the cross-sectoral collaboration on vulnerable pregnant women.

Objective: To explore GPs' barriers to cross-sectoral collaboration on pregnant women with vulnerabilities, and how barriers are associated with the organization of antenatal care (ANC) and general practice characteristics.

Design, setting and subjects: A cross-sectional questionnaire study among Danish GPs (n = 3465).

Main outcome measures: Descriptive statistics according to the Theoretical Domains Framework describes the barriers to collaboration. Analytical statistics with ordered logistic regression models demonstrate associations between selected barriers (the main outcome measures) and organization of ANC, GP and practice, characteristics.

Results: A total of 760 GPs (22%) participated. Perceived GP barriers to collaboration were lacking knowledge of ANC levels relevant to vulnerable pregnant women, insufficient information on vulnerability indicators from collaborating parties, heavy workload and insufficient remuneration for collaborative meetings. Being young were associated with insufficient GP knowledge of ANC levels. Old age was associated with less likelihood of experiencing heavy workload as a barrier.

Conclusions: Barriers to collaboration on vulnerable pregnant women were associated with some GP-organizational characteristics including low experience in collaborating with partners in ANC, and GP characteristics, such as age. Reducing general practice workload, e.g. by reorganizing priority areas, releasing more time to vulnerable patients, and improving cross-sectoral information sharing on vulnerability might improve collaboration on vulnerable pregnant women.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
背景:妊娠期的脆弱性导致围产期心理健康状况不佳。适当的跨部门合作可减轻围产期精神健康问题。全科医生(GPs)在评估妊娠易感性时往往会遇到障碍,但人们对全科医生在针对易感孕妇的跨部门合作中遇到的障碍知之甚少:目的:探讨全科医生在针对易受伤害孕妇的跨部门合作中遇到的障碍,以及这些障碍与产前护理(ANC)组织和全科医生特点之间的关系:主要结果测量指标:根据理论领域框架进行描述性统计,说明合作的障碍。利用有序逻辑回归模型进行分析统计,证明所选障碍(主要结果测量指标)与产前检查组织、全科医生和诊所特征之间的关联:结果:共有 760 名全科医生(22%)参与。全科医生认为的合作障碍包括:缺乏与弱势孕妇相关的产前护理水平知识、合作方提供的弱势指标信息不足、工作量繁重以及合作会议报酬不足。年轻与全科医生对产前检查水平了解不足有关。年老与工作量繁重成为障碍的可能性较低有关:针对弱势孕妇的合作障碍与全科医生组织的一些特征有关,包括与产前护理合作伙伴合作的经验不足,以及全科医生的年龄等特征。减轻全科医生的工作量,如重组优先领域、为弱势患者腾出更多时间,以及改善弱势孕妇的跨部门信息共享,可能会改善弱势孕妇方面的合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
19.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care is an international online open access journal publishing articles with relevance to general practice and primary health care. Focusing on the continuous professional development in family medicine the journal addresses clinical, epidemiological and humanistic topics in relation to the daily clinical practice. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care is owned by the members of the National Colleges of General Practice in the five Nordic countries through the Nordic Federation of General Practice (NFGP). The journal includes original research on topics related to general practice and family medicine, and publishes both quantitative and qualitative original research, editorials, discussion and analysis papers and reviews to facilitate continuing professional development in family medicine. The journal''s topics range broadly and include: • Clinical family medicine • Epidemiological research • Qualitative research • Health services research.
期刊最新文献
General practitioners' barriers to cross-sectoral collaboration on pregnant women with vulnerabilities: a cross-sectional survey in Danish general practice. Care in the era of digital health: experiences from Norwegian general practitioners. A systems perspective on gaps in the person-centered sick leave and rehabilitation process: a Swedish interview study. Physicians' intentions to use digital tools - a comparative survey, before and after the COVID-19 pandemic, in Southern Sweden. Primary healthcare professionals' attitudes toward patients with current or previous drug use.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1