Using Network Analysis of Adolescent Self-Ratings of ADHD Symptoms to Identify Central Symptoms and Their Associations With Each Other and Global Functioning.

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psychological Reports Pub Date : 2024-12-11 DOI:10.1177/00332941241308800
Rapson Gomez, Stephen Houghton
{"title":"Using Network Analysis of Adolescent Self-Ratings of ADHD Symptoms to Identify Central Symptoms and Their Associations With Each Other and Global Functioning.","authors":"Rapson Gomez, Stephen Houghton","doi":"10.1177/00332941241308800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This research examined the network properties (network graph, centrality, and edge weights) of the 18 ADHD symptoms, based on the self-ratings of 300 adolescents. The findings indicated the three symptoms with the highest centrality values were \"inattention\", \"wait\", and \"interrupt\". For edge weights, there were positive large effect size associations for \"lose\" with \"forgetful\", \"fidget with \"run\", \"blurt\" with \"wait\", and \"wait\" with \"interrupt\"; and positive moderate effect size associations for \"careless\" with \"instruction\", and \"avoid\" with \"listen\". Five IA symptoms (\"careless\", \"instruction\", \"avoid\", \"distracted\", and \"forgetful\") and one HI symptom (\"quiet\") were associated negatively and significantly with global functioning. Overall, these associations and relations should be prioritized when planning treatment for ADHD. This is the first study to examine the network properties of ADHD symptoms for adolescent self-ratings. The implications of the findings for theory include a better understanding of the relationships and interrelations between ADHD symptoms, especially in terms of the clustering of IA and HI symptoms and their associations with global functioning. In practice, the findings indicate there are different symptoms that could be the focus for assessment and treatment according to the ADHD presentation type.</p>","PeriodicalId":21149,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Reports","volume":" ","pages":"332941241308800"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Reports","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941241308800","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research examined the network properties (network graph, centrality, and edge weights) of the 18 ADHD symptoms, based on the self-ratings of 300 adolescents. The findings indicated the three symptoms with the highest centrality values were "inattention", "wait", and "interrupt". For edge weights, there were positive large effect size associations for "lose" with "forgetful", "fidget with "run", "blurt" with "wait", and "wait" with "interrupt"; and positive moderate effect size associations for "careless" with "instruction", and "avoid" with "listen". Five IA symptoms ("careless", "instruction", "avoid", "distracted", and "forgetful") and one HI symptom ("quiet") were associated negatively and significantly with global functioning. Overall, these associations and relations should be prioritized when planning treatment for ADHD. This is the first study to examine the network properties of ADHD symptoms for adolescent self-ratings. The implications of the findings for theory include a better understanding of the relationships and interrelations between ADHD symptoms, especially in terms of the clustering of IA and HI symptoms and their associations with global functioning. In practice, the findings indicate there are different symptoms that could be the focus for assessment and treatment according to the ADHD presentation type.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用青少年ADHD症状自我评定的网络分析来识别中心症状及其相互关联和整体功能。
本研究基于300名青少年的自评,考察了18种ADHD症状的网络属性(网络图、中心性和边缘权重)。结果表明,中心性值最高的三种症状是“注意力不集中”、“等待”和“打断”。对于边权,“失去”与“健忘”、“烦躁”与“逃跑”、“脱口而出”与“等待”、“等待”与“中断”存在正的大效应量关联;“粗心大意”与“指示”、“回避”与“倾听”存在正中等效应量的关联。五种IA症状(“粗心”、“指令”、“回避”、“分心”和“健忘”)和一种HI症状(“安静”)与整体功能呈负相关且显著相关。总之,在计划ADHD治疗时,这些关联和关系应该优先考虑。这是第一个研究青少年自我评定ADHD症状的网络特性的研究。这些发现的理论意义包括更好地理解ADHD症状之间的关系和相互关系,特别是就IA和HI症状的聚类及其与整体功能的关联而言。在实践中,研究结果表明,根据ADHD的表现类型,有不同的症状可以作为评估和治疗的重点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Reports
Psychological Reports PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
171
期刊最新文献
Understanding the Relationship Between Empathy, Theory of Mind (ToM), and Parenting Styles Among Children With Disruptive Behaviour. Examining the Effect of Threatened Masculinity on Gun Violence. Mental Illness, Gun Access and Carrying: A Test of Competing Hypotheses. Gun Owners Views on Gun Control in the United States: A Qualitative Study. Examining the Relation Between Early Violence Exposure and Firearm-Related Experiences in Emerging Adulthood: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1