Comparison of the effectiveness of aliskiren and ramipril for the management of hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.2 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Hipertension y Riesgo Vascular Pub Date : 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1016/j.hipert.2024.11.002
T Alam, M Asif Ansari
{"title":"Comparison of the effectiveness of aliskiren and ramipril for the management of hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"T Alam, M Asif Ansari","doi":"10.1016/j.hipert.2024.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Ramipril is an important option in the management of hypertension, while the role of aliskiren is still up for debate. We aim to meta-analyse and compare the effect of aliskiren with ramipril by measuring mean difference in systolic blood pressure (mdSBP) and mean difference in diastolic blood pressure (mdDBP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The search was conducted using the PubMed and Cochrane databases for eligible randomized clinical trials (RCTs) to perform a meta-analysis from January 2000 to May 2024. RCTs that included hypertensive patients who were under either aliskiren or ramipril treatment were included in the analysis. The risk of bias was evaluated using RoB 2.0. This study is registered with PROSPERO: CRD42024577105.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four studies were included: two studies were carried out for 2 months, and two were carried out for 6 months, including 693 and 329 patients, respectively, with mild to moderate hypertension and a mean age of 55.2 years. After 2 months, mdDBP was found to be significant (mdDBP=0.85mmHg, 95% CI: 0.73-0.97, I<sup>2</sup>=0%), but mdSBP was found to be non-significant (mdSBP=0.0mmHg, 95% CI: -0.17-0.17, I<sup>2</sup>=0%). There was a significant difference in the mdSBP (mdSBP=3.15mmHg, 95% CI: 2.13-4.17, I<sup>2</sup>=84%) and mdDBP (mdDBP=1.2mmHg, 95% CI: 1.09-1.31, I<sup>2</sup>=0%) at 6 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Aliskiren provides, in the short term, a slight improvement in BP in non-elderly hypertensive patients without diabetes or previous cardio-cerebrovascular disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":39403,"journal":{"name":"Hipertension y Riesgo Vascular","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hipertension y Riesgo Vascular","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hipert.2024.11.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Ramipril is an important option in the management of hypertension, while the role of aliskiren is still up for debate. We aim to meta-analyse and compare the effect of aliskiren with ramipril by measuring mean difference in systolic blood pressure (mdSBP) and mean difference in diastolic blood pressure (mdDBP).

Methods: The search was conducted using the PubMed and Cochrane databases for eligible randomized clinical trials (RCTs) to perform a meta-analysis from January 2000 to May 2024. RCTs that included hypertensive patients who were under either aliskiren or ramipril treatment were included in the analysis. The risk of bias was evaluated using RoB 2.0. This study is registered with PROSPERO: CRD42024577105.

Results: Four studies were included: two studies were carried out for 2 months, and two were carried out for 6 months, including 693 and 329 patients, respectively, with mild to moderate hypertension and a mean age of 55.2 years. After 2 months, mdDBP was found to be significant (mdDBP=0.85mmHg, 95% CI: 0.73-0.97, I2=0%), but mdSBP was found to be non-significant (mdSBP=0.0mmHg, 95% CI: -0.17-0.17, I2=0%). There was a significant difference in the mdSBP (mdSBP=3.15mmHg, 95% CI: 2.13-4.17, I2=84%) and mdDBP (mdDBP=1.2mmHg, 95% CI: 1.09-1.31, I2=0%) at 6 months.

Conclusion: Aliskiren provides, in the short term, a slight improvement in BP in non-elderly hypertensive patients without diabetes or previous cardio-cerebrovascular disease.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hipertension y Riesgo Vascular
Hipertension y Riesgo Vascular Medicine-Internal Medicine
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
38
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: La mejor publicación para mantenerse al día en los avances de la lucha contra esta patología. Incluye artículos de Investigación, Originales, Revisiones, Casos clínicos, Aplicación práctica y Resúmenes comentados a la bibliografía internacional. Además, es la Publicación Oficial de la Sociedad española de Hipertensión-Liga Española para la Lucha contra la Hipertensión Arterial.
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of antihypertensive medication adherence and associated factors in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Comparison of the effectiveness of aliskiren and ramipril for the management of hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Physicians' perception of guideline recommendations for the treatment of resistant hypertension by renal denervation: Resistant Hypertension Working Group, Argentine Hypertension Society. [Real-world efficacy and safety of baroreceptor activation therapy in a series of patients with refractory arterial hypertension]. Association of different domains of sedentary behavior and cardiovascular risk factors in adolescents: Cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1