Safe corridors for sacroiliac fixation in pediatric patients.

Felipe B Mantovani, Heloísa Z Faggion, Jamil F Soni, Weverley R Valenza, Matheus U S Klipp, Christiano S Uliana
{"title":"Safe corridors for sacroiliac fixation in pediatric patients.","authors":"Felipe B Mantovani, Heloísa Z Faggion, Jamil F Soni, Weverley R Valenza, Matheus U S Klipp, Christiano S Uliana","doi":"10.1007/s00590-024-04154-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pelvic ring fractures are rare in the pediatric population and can be treated using sacroiliac screws when needed. The aim of this study was to identify safe anatomical corridors for sacroiliac fixation in different pediatric age groups and also to determine the prevalence of sacral dysmorphism in the study sample.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We measured the dimensions of the horizontal and oblique S1 corridors and the horizontal S2 corridor in pelvic computed tomography scans of 138 children aged 1 to 16 years. The patients were divided into three groups (Group 1, 1-6 years old, Group 2, 6-11 years old; and Group 3, 11-16 years old) to identify safe corridors in each age group. We compared the corridors in terms of cross-sectional areas and estimated the prevalence of dysmorphic sacral bones in the study sample.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data are presented as medians. For each group, the height, depth, and length were, respectively: Group 1: 9.1 mm, 13.9 mm, and 47 mm; Group 2: 13.5 mm, 15.7 mm, and 55 mm; and Group 3: 15.7 mm, 16.8 mm, and 72 mm. The prevalence of sacral dysmorphism was high (44.2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In Group 3, 7.0 mm screws were safe in all three corridors. For Group 2, the oblique S1 corridor could accommodate 7.0 mm screws, whereas in the other studied corridors, the 3.5 mm screw would be better indicated. For Group 1, the oblique S1 corridor was best suited, and only for the 3.5 mm screw.</p>","PeriodicalId":50484,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology","volume":"35 1","pages":"37"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-024-04154-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Pelvic ring fractures are rare in the pediatric population and can be treated using sacroiliac screws when needed. The aim of this study was to identify safe anatomical corridors for sacroiliac fixation in different pediatric age groups and also to determine the prevalence of sacral dysmorphism in the study sample.

Method: We measured the dimensions of the horizontal and oblique S1 corridors and the horizontal S2 corridor in pelvic computed tomography scans of 138 children aged 1 to 16 years. The patients were divided into three groups (Group 1, 1-6 years old, Group 2, 6-11 years old; and Group 3, 11-16 years old) to identify safe corridors in each age group. We compared the corridors in terms of cross-sectional areas and estimated the prevalence of dysmorphic sacral bones in the study sample.

Results: Data are presented as medians. For each group, the height, depth, and length were, respectively: Group 1: 9.1 mm, 13.9 mm, and 47 mm; Group 2: 13.5 mm, 15.7 mm, and 55 mm; and Group 3: 15.7 mm, 16.8 mm, and 72 mm. The prevalence of sacral dysmorphism was high (44.2%).

Conclusion: In Group 3, 7.0 mm screws were safe in all three corridors. For Group 2, the oblique S1 corridor could accommodate 7.0 mm screws, whereas in the other studied corridors, the 3.5 mm screw would be better indicated. For Group 1, the oblique S1 corridor was best suited, and only for the 3.5 mm screw.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小儿骶髂固定的安全通道。
前言:骨盆环骨折在儿科人群中很少见,必要时可以使用骶髂螺钉治疗。本研究的目的是确定不同儿童年龄组骶髂固定的安全解剖通道,并确定研究样本中骶骨畸形的患病率。方法:对138例1 ~ 16岁儿童骨盆计算机断层扫描中水平、倾斜S1通道和水平S2通道的尺寸进行测量。将患者分为3组(1 ~ 6岁组,2 ~ 6 ~ 11岁组;以及第3组(11-16岁),以确定每个年龄组的安全走廊。我们比较了走廊的横截面积,并估计了研究样本中骶骨畸形的患病率。结果:数据以中位数表示。各组高、深、长分别为:组1:9.1 mm、13.9 mm、47 mm;第二组:13.5 mm、15.7 mm、55 mm;第3组:15.7 mm、16.8 mm和72 mm。骶骨畸形发生率高(44.2%)。结论:在第三组中,7.0 mm螺钉在三个通道中均是安全的。对于第2组,斜S1通道可容纳7.0 mm螺钉,而在其他研究通道中,3.5 mm螺钉更适合。对于组1,斜S1通道最适合,仅适用于3.5 mm螺钉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
265
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology (EJOST) aims to publish high quality Orthopedic scientific work. The objective of our journal is to disseminate meaningful, impactful, clinically relevant work from each and every region of the world, that has the potential to change and or inform clinical practice.
期刊最新文献
Clinical and epidemiological differences in staphylococcal osteoarticular infections: insights for developing hospital-based infection control interventions. Outcomes of intramedullary nailing versus plate fixation for humeral shaft fractures: a retrospective cohort study. Metaphyseal distal radius fractures in adolescents: is closed reduction and casting sufficient for most? One-stage posterior-only correction in severe and rigid scoliosis exceeding 90°: radiographic and surgical outcomes. Comparative analysis of modified posterior mini-open surgery versus standard open posterior approach for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis correction: a prospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1