Sociodemographic and Smoking Characteristics Associated With Low Perceived Harm of "Organic" and "Additive-Free" Tobacco Products Among US Adults.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Nicotine & Tobacco Research Pub Date : 2024-12-03 DOI:10.1093/ntr/ntae289
Cara Drake, Katherine Starcevich, Olivia Wackowski, Stefanie K Gratale, Ollie Ganz, Pamela Ohman-Strickland, Jennifer L Pearson
{"title":"Sociodemographic and Smoking Characteristics Associated With Low Perceived Harm of \"Organic\" and \"Additive-Free\" Tobacco Products Among US Adults.","authors":"Cara Drake, Katherine Starcevich, Olivia Wackowski, Stefanie K Gratale, Ollie Ganz, Pamela Ohman-Strickland, Jennifer L Pearson","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntae289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study describes the prevalence and correlates of beliefs that \"organic\" and \"additive-free\" tobacco products are less harmful than conventional tobacco products among US adults, stratified by smoking status and preference for Natural American Spirit (NAS), a brand that uses \"organic\" and historically used \"additive-free.\"</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study Wave 6 data (n = 29 516) for adults aged 18+ years and generated weighted prevalence estimates. We used weighted logistic regressions to model the odds of believing organic/additive-free tobacco products are \"less harmful\" versus \"about the same\" or \"more harmful.\"</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 10.0% of adults, 15.3% of adults who smoke cigarettes, and 34.0% of adults who smoke NAS believed \"organic\" tobacco products were less harmful, with similar findings for \"additive-free.\" Belief that \"organic\" products were less harmful was greater among people who were ages 18-34 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.6; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.4, 1.9) or 35-54 (aOR: 1.4; 95% CI: 1.1, 1.6), were Black (aOR: 1.3; 95% CI: 1.2, 1.5), currently smoke (aOR: 2.0; 95% CI: 1.7, 2.3), or formerly smoke (aOR: 1.4; 95% CI: 1.2, 1.6). Belief that \"additive-free\" products were less harmful was greater among males (aOR: 1.3; 95% CI: 1.1, 1.4) and people aged 18-34 (aOR: 1.3; 95% CI: 1.1, 1.5), who currently smoke (aOR: 2.0; 95% CI: 1.7, 2.4) or who formerly smoke (aOR: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.4, 2.0).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Many adults who smoke, particularly those who smoke NAS, believe organic and additive-free tobacco products are less harmful than regular cigarettes.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>In light of recent changes in the tobacco marketing environment, this study provides an update on harm perceptions from \"organic\" and \"additive-free\" cigarette product descriptors. Results indicate that many US adults continue to believe that \"organic\" and \"additive-free\" tobacco products are less harmful tobacco products. These beliefs may continue to mislead people, as they are more prevalent among young people, people who identify as Black, males, people who smoke cigarettes, and those who smoke NAS cigarettes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntae289","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study describes the prevalence and correlates of beliefs that "organic" and "additive-free" tobacco products are less harmful than conventional tobacco products among US adults, stratified by smoking status and preference for Natural American Spirit (NAS), a brand that uses "organic" and historically used "additive-free."

Methods: We analyzed Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study Wave 6 data (n = 29 516) for adults aged 18+ years and generated weighted prevalence estimates. We used weighted logistic regressions to model the odds of believing organic/additive-free tobacco products are "less harmful" versus "about the same" or "more harmful."

Results: Overall, 10.0% of adults, 15.3% of adults who smoke cigarettes, and 34.0% of adults who smoke NAS believed "organic" tobacco products were less harmful, with similar findings for "additive-free." Belief that "organic" products were less harmful was greater among people who were ages 18-34 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.6; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.4, 1.9) or 35-54 (aOR: 1.4; 95% CI: 1.1, 1.6), were Black (aOR: 1.3; 95% CI: 1.2, 1.5), currently smoke (aOR: 2.0; 95% CI: 1.7, 2.3), or formerly smoke (aOR: 1.4; 95% CI: 1.2, 1.6). Belief that "additive-free" products were less harmful was greater among males (aOR: 1.3; 95% CI: 1.1, 1.4) and people aged 18-34 (aOR: 1.3; 95% CI: 1.1, 1.5), who currently smoke (aOR: 2.0; 95% CI: 1.7, 2.4) or who formerly smoke (aOR: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.4, 2.0).

Conclusions: Many adults who smoke, particularly those who smoke NAS, believe organic and additive-free tobacco products are less harmful than regular cigarettes.

Implications: In light of recent changes in the tobacco marketing environment, this study provides an update on harm perceptions from "organic" and "additive-free" cigarette product descriptors. Results indicate that many US adults continue to believe that "organic" and "additive-free" tobacco products are less harmful tobacco products. These beliefs may continue to mislead people, as they are more prevalent among young people, people who identify as Black, males, people who smoke cigarettes, and those who smoke NAS cigarettes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在美国成年人中,社会人口统计学和吸烟特征与“有机”和“无添加剂”烟草制品的低感知危害相关。
引言:本研究描述了“有机”和“无添加剂”烟草制品比传统烟草制品危害更小的信念在美国成年人中的流行程度及其相关性,根据吸烟状况和对天然美国精神(NAS)的偏好进行分层,NAS是一个使用“有机”和历史上使用“无添加剂”的品牌。方法:我们分析了18岁以上成年人的烟草与健康研究第6波人口评估数据(n = 29516),并产生加权患病率估计值。我们使用加权逻辑回归来模拟相信有机/无添加剂烟草产品“危害较小”与“大致相同”或“危害更大”的几率。结果:总体而言,10.0%的成年人、15.3%的吸烟成年人和34.0%的吸烟成年人认为“有机”烟草产品的危害较小,“无添加剂”烟草产品的危害也较小。18-34岁的人群更相信“有机”产品危害更小(调整后比值比[aOR]: 1.6;95%置信区间[CI]: 1.4, 1.9)或35-54 (aOR: 1.4;95% CI: 1.1, 1.6),均为黑色(aOR: 1.3;95% CI: 1.2, 1.5),目前吸烟(aOR: 2.0;95% CI: 1.7, 2.3)或以前吸烟(aOR: 1.4;95% ci: 1.2, 1.6)。男性更相信“无添加剂”产品危害更小(aOR: 1.3;95% CI: 1.1, 1.4)和18-34岁人群(aOR: 1.3;95% CI: 1.1, 1.5),目前吸烟(aOR: 2.0;95% CI: 1.7, 2.4)或曾经吸烟的人(aOR: 1.7;95% ci: 1.4, 2.0)。结论:许多吸烟的成年人,特别是那些抽NAS的人,认为有机和无添加剂烟草产品比普通香烟危害小。含义:鉴于最近烟草营销环境的变化,本研究提供了对“有机”和“无添加剂”卷烟产品描述的危害认知的更新。结果表明,许多美国成年人仍然相信“有机”和“无添加剂”烟草制品是危害较小的烟草制品。这些信念可能会继续误导人们,因为它们在年轻人、黑人、男性、吸烟者和吸NAS香烟的人中更为普遍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Nicotine & Tobacco Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nicotine & Tobacco Research is one of the world''s few peer-reviewed journals devoted exclusively to the study of nicotine and tobacco. It aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas. Along with manuscripts from each of the areas mentioned above, the editors encourage submissions that are integrative in nature and that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal is sponsored by the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). It publishes twelve times a year.
期刊最新文献
Perceptions of Barriers and Facilitators to Reducing Exposure to Secondhand Smoke in the Home: A Qualitative Study With Palestinian-Arab Women in Israel. The Impact of Three Alternate Nicotine-Delivery Products on Combusted Cigarette Use: A Randomized Controlled Trial. The Impact of Menthol Cigarette Bans: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Reactions to a Hypothetical Ban of Open-System Electronic Cigarettes Among People Who Currently Use Electronic Cigarettes. Trends in Exclusive Non-Cigarette Tobacco Smoking in England: A Population Survey 2013-2023.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1