Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Validation of the Simplified Chinese Version of the Fear Avoidance Component Scale (FACS).

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pain Research & Management Pub Date : 2024-12-05 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/prm/7966689
Zhongyi Tu, Junfang Miao, Yanzhao Zhang, Zhaohui Yang, Rui Xu, Randy Neblett
{"title":"Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Validation of the Simplified Chinese Version of the Fear Avoidance Component Scale (FACS).","authors":"Zhongyi Tu, Junfang Miao, Yanzhao Zhang, Zhaohui Yang, Rui Xu, Randy Neblett","doi":"10.1155/prm/7966689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Strong associations have been demonstrated between chronic musculoskeletal pain, pain-related fear-avoidance (FA) of activities of daily living, and functional disability. The Fear Avoidance Components Scale (FACS) is a patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure, which was designed to evaluate cognitive, emotional, and behavioural dimensions of FA. <b>Objective:</b> The study aims were to translate the English version of the FACS into Simplified Chinese and then to examine its psychometric properties. <b>Methods:</b> The translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the FACS from English to Chinese was performed with standard methodology. A group of 330 subjects with chronic musculoskeletal pain completed the FACS-Chi and additional FA-related PRO measures. The FACS-Chi was then completed a second time, 1 week later. <b>Results:</b> The FACS-Chi showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.920) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.918). A confirmatory factor analysis of the 2-factor model determined in the original English version of FACS revealed an acceptable fit. Strong correlations were found between FACS-Chi scores and other PRO measures of perceived level of disability, pain catastrophizing, and pain-related anxiety (<i>p</i> < 0.001 for all analyses). <b>Conclusions:</b> The FACS-Chi demonstrated good psychometric properties, including excellent test-retest reliability and internal consistency and satisfactory construct validity. The FACS-Chi may be a useful measure of pain-related FA in Chinese-speaking patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":19913,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research & Management","volume":"2024 ","pages":"7966689"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11637624/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Research & Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/prm/7966689","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Strong associations have been demonstrated between chronic musculoskeletal pain, pain-related fear-avoidance (FA) of activities of daily living, and functional disability. The Fear Avoidance Components Scale (FACS) is a patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure, which was designed to evaluate cognitive, emotional, and behavioural dimensions of FA. Objective: The study aims were to translate the English version of the FACS into Simplified Chinese and then to examine its psychometric properties. Methods: The translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the FACS from English to Chinese was performed with standard methodology. A group of 330 subjects with chronic musculoskeletal pain completed the FACS-Chi and additional FA-related PRO measures. The FACS-Chi was then completed a second time, 1 week later. Results: The FACS-Chi showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.920) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.918). A confirmatory factor analysis of the 2-factor model determined in the original English version of FACS revealed an acceptable fit. Strong correlations were found between FACS-Chi scores and other PRO measures of perceived level of disability, pain catastrophizing, and pain-related anxiety (p < 0.001 for all analyses). Conclusions: The FACS-Chi demonstrated good psychometric properties, including excellent test-retest reliability and internal consistency and satisfactory construct validity. The FACS-Chi may be a useful measure of pain-related FA in Chinese-speaking patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Research & Management
Pain Research & Management CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pain Research and Management is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies in all areas of pain management. The most recent Impact Factor for Pain Research and Management is 1.685 according to the 2015 Journal Citation Reports released by Thomson Reuters in 2016.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Safety and Efficacy of Anesthesia Methods in Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: A Network Meta-Analysis. Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Validation of the Simplified Chinese Version of the Fear Avoidance Component Scale (FACS). Effects of 4 mg and 8 mg Dexamethasone Added to Intrathecal Bupivacaine on Perioperative Analgesia Among Adult Orthopedic Patients at Sodo Christian Hospital: A Prospective Cohort Study. NPD1 Relieves Neuropathic Pain and Accelerates the Recovery of Motor Function After Peripheral Nerve Injury. Tooth Sensitivity Following Hydrogen Peroxide Bleaching With and Without Ozone: A Randomized Controlled Trial: Tooth Sensitivity Following H2O2 Versus H2O2/Ozone Bleaching.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1