CATALYZE: a deep learning approach for cataract assessment and grading on SS-OCT images.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of cataract and refractive surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001598
Christophe Panthier, Pierre Zeboulon, Helene Rouger, Jacques Bijon, Damien Gatinel
{"title":"CATALYZE: a deep learning approach for cataract assessment and grading on SS-OCT images.","authors":"Christophe Panthier, Pierre Zeboulon, Helene Rouger, Jacques Bijon, Damien Gatinel","doi":"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess a new objective deep learning model cataract grading method based on swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) scans provided by the Anterion.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single-center study at the Rothschild Foundation, Paris, France.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients consulting for cataract evaluation and consenting to study participation were included. History of previous ocular surgery, cornea or retina disorders, and ocular dryness were exclusion criteria. Our CATALYZE pipeline was applied to Anterion image providing layerwise cataract metrics and an overall clinical significance index (CSI) of cataract. Ocular scatter index (OSI) was also measured with a double-pass aberrometer (OQAS) and compared with our CSI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>548 eyes were included, 331 in the development set (48 with cataract and 283 controls) and 217 in the validation set (85 with cataract and 132 controls) of 315 patients aged 19 to 85 years (mean ± SD: 50 ± 21 years). The CSI correlated with the OSI ( r2 = 0.87, P < .01). CSI area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was comparable with OSI AUROC (0.985 vs 0.981 respectively, P > .05) with 95% sensitivity and 95% specificity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The deep learning pipeline CATALYZE based on Anterion SS-OCT may be a reliable and comprehensive objective cataract grading method.</p>","PeriodicalId":15214,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","volume":" ","pages":"222-228"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001598","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess a new objective deep learning model cataract grading method based on swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) scans provided by the Anterion.

Setting: Single-center study at the Rothschild Foundation, Paris, France.

Design: Prospective cross-sectional study.

Methods: All patients consulting for cataract evaluation and consenting to study participation were included. History of previous ocular surgery, cornea or retina disorders, and ocular dryness were exclusion criteria. Our CATALYZE pipeline was applied to Anterion image providing layerwise cataract metrics and an overall clinical significance index (CSI) of cataract. Ocular scatter index (OSI) was also measured with a double-pass aberrometer (OQAS) and compared with our CSI.

Results: 548 eyes were included, 331 in the development set (48 with cataract and 283 controls) and 217 in the validation set (85 with cataract and 132 controls) of 315 patients aged 19 to 85 years (mean ± SD: 50 ± 21 years). The CSI correlated with the OSI ( r2 = 0.87, P < .01). CSI area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was comparable with OSI AUROC (0.985 vs 0.981 respectively, P > .05) with 95% sensitivity and 95% specificity.

Conclusions: The deep learning pipeline CATALYZE based on Anterion SS-OCT may be a reliable and comprehensive objective cataract grading method.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
催化:一种深度学习方法,用于对ss-oct正面图像进行白内障评估和分级。
目的:评估由Anterion®(Heidelberg, Germany)提供的基于扫源光学相干断层扫描(SS-OCT)扫描的一种新的客观深度学习模型白内障分级方法。环境:法国巴黎罗斯柴尔德基金会的单中心研究。设计:前瞻性横断面研究。方法:纳入所有咨询白内障评估并同意参与研究的患者。排除标准为既往眼部手术史、角膜或视网膜疾病、眼干涩。我们的catalyst流水线应用于Anterion®图像,提供分层白内障指标和白内障的总体临床意义指数(CSI)。眼散射指数(OSI)也用双通像差仪(OQAS®)测量,并与我们的CSI进行比较。结果:共纳入548只眼,其中发育组331只眼(48只白内障,283只对照),验证组217只眼(85只白内障,132只对照),年龄为315例(平均±SD: 50±21岁)。CSI与OSI相关(r2 = 0.87, p0.05),敏感性为95%,特异性为95%。结论:我们基于Anterion®SS-OCT的深度学习管道catalyst是一种可靠、全面、客观的白内障分级方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
259
审稿时长
8.5 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery (JCRS), a preeminent peer-reviewed monthly ophthalmology publication, is the official journal of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) and the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS). JCRS publishes high quality articles on all aspects of anterior segment surgery. In addition to original clinical studies, the journal features a consultation section, practical techniques, important cases, and reviews as well as basic science articles.
期刊最新文献
Real-world efficacy, safety, and usability of a microvolume eyedrop delivery device in glaucoma: prospective randomized crossover trial. Cataract surgery in the context of age-related macular degeneration: challenges and considerations. Segmentation of patients with cataract according to their ocular biometry: the LAKE classification. Comparison of ocular biometry and refractive outcome between a new and classic optical biometer. Cartwheel cataract, a specific sign of PAX6 -related aniridia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1