Effectiveness of the modified Seldinger technique for peripheral central catheter in newborns: a randomized clinical trial.

IF 1.2 Q3 NURSING Revista Brasileira De Enfermagem Pub Date : 2024-12-16 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/0034-7167-2024-0189
Izabela Linha Secco, Mitzy Tannia Reichembach Danski, Luana Lenzi, Higor Pacheco Pereira, Juliana Szreider de Azevedo, Letícia Pontes, Regiane Queiroz Afonso, Camila Fernanda da Silva Milani
{"title":"Effectiveness of the modified Seldinger technique for peripheral central catheter in newborns: a randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Izabela Linha Secco, Mitzy Tannia Reichembach Danski, Luana Lenzi, Higor Pacheco Pereira, Juliana Szreider de Azevedo, Letícia Pontes, Regiane Queiroz Afonso, Camila Fernanda da Silva Milani","doi":"10.1590/0034-7167-2024-0189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>to evaluate the effectiveness of peripheral central catheterization by comparing the modified Seldinger technique and the conventional technique in critically ill newborns.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>randomized unmasked clinical trial conducted in a public children's hospital. Participation of 111 newborns with randomized allocation, 56 in the control group (conventional technique) and 55 in the experimental group (modified Seldinger). Success and absence of complications were evaluated as primary outcomes. The pain scale, difficulty in hemostasis, procedure time and number of punctures were considered secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>there was no statistical significance between groups, either for success (p=0.705) or absence of complications (p=0.347). A lower pain score, improved hemostasis, increased assertiveness with fewer punctures and reduced procedure time were not observed in the experimental group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>the modified Seldinger technique did not prove to be a more effective insertion technology compared to the conventional method. Brazilian Clinical Trial Registry: RBR-69vks36.</p>","PeriodicalId":21200,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira De Enfermagem","volume":"77 6","pages":"e20240189"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11654518/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira De Enfermagem","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2024-0189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: to evaluate the effectiveness of peripheral central catheterization by comparing the modified Seldinger technique and the conventional technique in critically ill newborns.

Methods: randomized unmasked clinical trial conducted in a public children's hospital. Participation of 111 newborns with randomized allocation, 56 in the control group (conventional technique) and 55 in the experimental group (modified Seldinger). Success and absence of complications were evaluated as primary outcomes. The pain scale, difficulty in hemostasis, procedure time and number of punctures were considered secondary outcomes.

Results: there was no statistical significance between groups, either for success (p=0.705) or absence of complications (p=0.347). A lower pain score, improved hemostasis, increased assertiveness with fewer punctures and reduced procedure time were not observed in the experimental group.

Conclusions: the modified Seldinger technique did not prove to be a more effective insertion technology compared to the conventional method. Brazilian Clinical Trial Registry: RBR-69vks36.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改良Seldinger技术用于新生儿外周中心导管的有效性:一项随机临床试验。
目的:比较改良Seldinger技术与常规方法在危重新生儿外周血管中心置管中的应用效果。方法:在某公立儿童医院进行随机开箱临床试验。随机分配111例新生儿,对照组56例(常规技术),试验组55例(改良Seldinger技术)。成功和无并发症作为主要结果进行评估。疼痛程度、止血困难、手术时间和穿刺次数被认为是次要结果。结果:两组间治疗成功率(p=0.705)和并发症发生率(p=0.347)比较,差异均无统计学意义。实验组没有观察到更低的疼痛评分,更好的止血,更少的穿刺和更短的手术时间增加了自信。结论:改良Seldinger技术与传统方法相比并不是一种更有效的插入技术。巴西临床试验注册:RBR-69vks36。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
477
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: The Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem created in 1932, March 20 is the official publication of the Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (Brazilian Nursing Association) has as purpose to disseminate the scientific production from different nursing interest areas of knowledge, including those which express the political project of the Association. The Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem is the oldest journal of the Brazilian nursing. Its first title was "Annaes de Enfermagem" from 1932 to 1941, being entitled Anais de Enfermagem" until 1955, when its title was changed to the current.
期刊最新文献
ERRATUM. ERRATUM. Individualization of implantable devices in Brazil. An overview of the implementation of the first doctorate program in nursing in the Northern region. Evaluation of care for people with HIV in Primary Health Care: construct validation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1