Systematic review of the efficacy of yoga and mindfulness in the management of pediatric obesity

IF 4.1 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences Pub Date : 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1111/nyas.15245
Mardia López-Alarcón, Miguel A. Villasis-Keever, José R. Fernández
{"title":"Systematic review of the efficacy of yoga and mindfulness in the management of pediatric obesity","authors":"Mardia López-Alarcón, Miguel A. Villasis-Keever, José R. Fernández","doi":"10.1111/nyas.15245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The neuroplasticity of adolescents could make them responsive to interventions affecting brain maturation such as yoga and mindfulness. We aimed to determine their efficacy and safety for the management of children and adolescents with obesity. A systematic search using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycInfo was performed up to March 2024. We considered randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using yoga or mindfulness alone (or combined with standard therapy) compared to placebo, nothing, or standard therapy for weight loss. Methodological quality of studies was assessed with the Risk of Bias 2 tool. The primary outcomes were changes in weight and adiposity (kg, body mass index [BMI], BMI <i>z</i>-score, fat mass, waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio). We assessed 4 yoga and 7 mindfulness RCTs, including 620 participants 8–19 years old. The number of participants varied per type of intervention (yoga, <i>n</i> = 10–63; mindfulness, <i>n</i> = 11–47). Comparators were no-intervention or active controls. All yoga trials reported anthropometric improvements, but all trials combined yoga with extra physical activity. Five out of seven mindfulness trials reported anthropometric improvements. The methodological quality of the RCTs was low. No safety information was reported. The effect of yoga and mindfulness on psychological and metabolic variables was inconsistent. This evidence is insufficient to recommend yoga or mindfulness for the management of adolescents with obesity.","PeriodicalId":8250,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.15245","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The neuroplasticity of adolescents could make them responsive to interventions affecting brain maturation such as yoga and mindfulness. We aimed to determine their efficacy and safety for the management of children and adolescents with obesity. A systematic search using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycInfo was performed up to March 2024. We considered randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using yoga or mindfulness alone (or combined with standard therapy) compared to placebo, nothing, or standard therapy for weight loss. Methodological quality of studies was assessed with the Risk of Bias 2 tool. The primary outcomes were changes in weight and adiposity (kg, body mass index [BMI], BMI z-score, fat mass, waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio). We assessed 4 yoga and 7 mindfulness RCTs, including 620 participants 8–19 years old. The number of participants varied per type of intervention (yoga, n = 10–63; mindfulness, n = 11–47). Comparators were no-intervention or active controls. All yoga trials reported anthropometric improvements, but all trials combined yoga with extra physical activity. Five out of seven mindfulness trials reported anthropometric improvements. The methodological quality of the RCTs was low. No safety information was reported. The effect of yoga and mindfulness on psychological and metabolic variables was inconsistent. This evidence is insufficient to recommend yoga or mindfulness for the management of adolescents with obesity.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
青少年的神经可塑性使他们对瑜伽和正念等影响大脑成熟的干预措施反应灵敏。我们的目的是确定这些干预措施对儿童和青少年肥胖症治疗的有效性和安全性。截至 2024 年 3 月,我们使用 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 PsycInfo 进行了系统性检索。我们考虑了单独使用瑜伽或正念(或与标准疗法相结合)与使用安慰剂、不使用任何疗法或标准疗法进行减肥比较的随机对照试验(RCT)。研究的方法学质量采用 "偏倚风险 2 "工具进行评估。主要结果是体重和脂肪率(公斤、体重指数[BMI]、BMI z-score、脂肪量、腰围、腰臀比)的变化。我们评估了 4 项瑜伽和 7 项正念 RCT,包括 620 名 8-19 岁的参与者。每种干预类型的参与者人数各不相同(瑜伽,n = 10-63;正念,n = 11-47)。对照组为无干预或积极对照组。所有瑜伽试验都报告了人体测量指标的改善情况,但所有试验都将瑜伽与额外的体育活动相结合。七项正念试验中有五项报告了人体测量指标的改善情况。研究性试验的方法质量较低。未报告安全性信息。瑜伽和正念对心理和代谢变量的影响并不一致。这些证据不足以推荐将瑜伽或正念用于青少年肥胖症的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
1.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the New York Academy of Sciences, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences provides multidisciplinary perspectives on research of current scientific interest with far-reaching implications for the wider scientific community and society at large. Each special issue assembles the best thinking of key contributors to a field of investigation at a time when emerging developments offer the promise of new insight. Individually themed, Annals special issues stimulate new ways to think about science by providing a neutral forum for discourse—within and across many institutions and fields.
期刊最新文献
The role of macroautophagy in substance use disorders Behavior-change lifestyle interventions for the treatment of obesity in children and adolescents: A scoping review Systematic review of the efficacy of yoga and mindfulness in the management of pediatric obesity Stable isotope tempestology of tropical cyclones across the North Atlantic and Eastern Pacific Ocean basins Enhanced wet grip with North American river otter paws
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1