Considerations for implementing regulation of decapods in science.

Animal welfare (South Mimms, England) Pub Date : 2024-11-27 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1017/awf.2024.50
Adam Powell, Ann-Lisbeth Agnalt, Kevin Heasman, Amaya Albalat
{"title":"Considerations for implementing regulation of decapods in science.","authors":"Adam Powell, Ann-Lisbeth Agnalt, Kevin Heasman, Amaya Albalat","doi":"10.1017/awf.2024.50","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Decapod crustaceans, commonly utilised for pure or applied scientific research and commercial food production, have generally remained outside ethical debate. However, in the last decade many parts of the world have seen an increase in public interest in the welfare of decapod crustaceans and statutory legal protection has been introduced in several countries. Although still limited to a small number of countries and remaining relatively unharmonised, relevant legislation could be increasingly broadened to include decapods in further jurisdictions. Much existing legislation, originally intended for protecting terrestrial vertebrates during scientific study, might be unsuitable for aquatic invertebrates such as decapods. Indeed, precedence with many fish species and cephalopods suggests detail is lacking with respect to fundamental guidance. Therefore, similar inclusion of decapods into such legislation could make welfare or scientific goals more challenging to achieve unless relevant guidance is available, particularly to animal care practitioners. This horizon paper aims to summarise existing decapod legislation, and the considerations required should decapods be included in current conceptual frameworks and scientific legislation.</p>","PeriodicalId":520228,"journal":{"name":"Animal welfare (South Mimms, England)","volume":"33 ","pages":"e55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11655277/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal welfare (South Mimms, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/awf.2024.50","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Decapod crustaceans, commonly utilised for pure or applied scientific research and commercial food production, have generally remained outside ethical debate. However, in the last decade many parts of the world have seen an increase in public interest in the welfare of decapod crustaceans and statutory legal protection has been introduced in several countries. Although still limited to a small number of countries and remaining relatively unharmonised, relevant legislation could be increasingly broadened to include decapods in further jurisdictions. Much existing legislation, originally intended for protecting terrestrial vertebrates during scientific study, might be unsuitable for aquatic invertebrates such as decapods. Indeed, precedence with many fish species and cephalopods suggests detail is lacking with respect to fundamental guidance. Therefore, similar inclusion of decapods into such legislation could make welfare or scientific goals more challenging to achieve unless relevant guidance is available, particularly to animal care practitioners. This horizon paper aims to summarise existing decapod legislation, and the considerations required should decapods be included in current conceptual frameworks and scientific legislation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
科学上实施十足类动物法规的思考。
通常用于纯科学研究或应用科学研究和商业食品生产的十足甲壳类动物,通常处于伦理争论之外。然而,在过去的十年中,世界上许多地方的公众对十足甲壳类动物的福利的兴趣有所增加,一些国家已经引入了法定的法律保护。虽然仍然限于少数国家,而且仍然相对不协调,但有关立法可以日益扩大,在其他司法管辖区包括十足动物。许多现有的立法原本是为了在科学研究期间保护陆生脊椎动物,但可能不适用于水生无脊椎动物,如十足类动物。事实上,许多鱼类和头足类动物的先例表明,缺乏基本指导的细节。因此,类似地将十足类动物纳入此类立法可能会使福利或科学目标更难实现,除非有相关指导,特别是对动物护理从业人员。本文旨在总结现有的十足动物立法,以及将十足动物纳入当前的概念框架和科学立法所需的考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Emergency response in overturned pig transport vehicles: Description and discussion of Danish cases from a One Welfare perspective. A qualitative exploration of owner experiences following dog adoption. A wicked problem: Systemic issues surrounding Canadian equestrian dressage and dressage horse welfare. 'No one cares about the animal like me.' Indian veterinarians' experiences of improving animal welfare through Continuing Professional Development. Job satisfaction and animal welfare at slaughter: A survey of Official Veterinarians in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1