Provocation: An agenda for the future of TV studies: Technology, audiences, stakeholders

IF 1.1 2区 艺术学 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION Critical Studies in Television Pub Date : 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1177/17496020241308763
Catherine Johnson
{"title":"Provocation: An agenda for the future of TV studies: Technology, audiences, stakeholders","authors":"Catherine Johnson","doi":"10.1177/17496020241308763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As viewing shifts from broadcast to streaming, what should be the role for TV studies? Arguing for the need to account for the multi-faceted nature of contemporary television, this provocation proposes an agenda for the future of TV studies. It argues that the technological consequences of shifting to internet-delivered television demand new theorisations of television as software, new digital tools and methods, and audience research that pays more attention to less engaged and unconnected audiences. Such research would ensure that critical policy decisions about the future of television draw on the depth of expertise within TV studies as a discipline.","PeriodicalId":51917,"journal":{"name":"Critical Studies in Television","volume":"263 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Studies in Television","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17496020241308763","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As viewing shifts from broadcast to streaming, what should be the role for TV studies? Arguing for the need to account for the multi-faceted nature of contemporary television, this provocation proposes an agenda for the future of TV studies. It argues that the technological consequences of shifting to internet-delivered television demand new theorisations of television as software, new digital tools and methods, and audience research that pays more attention to less engaged and unconnected audiences. Such research would ensure that critical policy decisions about the future of television draw on the depth of expertise within TV studies as a discipline.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
挑衅:电视研究的未来议程:技术、观众、利益相关者
随着观看方式从广播转向流媒体,电视研究应该扮演什么角色?认为有必要考虑到当代电视的多面性,这一挑衅为电视研究的未来提出了一个议程。它认为,转向互联网电视的技术后果需要将电视作为软件的新理论,新的数字工具和方法,以及更多关注参与度较低和未连接的观众的受众研究。这样的研究将确保有关电视未来的关键政策决定借鉴电视研究作为一门学科的深度专业知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Studies in Television
Critical Studies in Television FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
30.00%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: Critical Studies in Television publishes articles that draw together divergent disciplines and different ways of thinking, to promote and advance television as a distinct academic discipline. It welcomes contributions on any aspect of television—production studies and institutional histories, audience and reception studies, theoretical approaches, conceptual paradigms and pedagogical questions. It continues to invite analyses of the compositional principles and aesthetics of texts, as well as contextual matters relating to both contemporary and past productions. CST also features book reviews, dossiers and debates. The journal is scholarly but accessible, dedicated to generating new knowledge and fostering a dynamic intellectual platform for television studies.
期刊最新文献
Breaking boundaries: Smallness and the dynamics of European audiovisual industries in the age of streaming Virtual Audience System as a new form of participation on television: Real-time fusion of different environments and audiovisual interactions into live broadcasts A utopian desire called dystopia: Analysing transnational projections of anti-capitalist futures in four post-apocalyptic television series Book Review: Sex Education: School’s Out for Netflix DeborahShawStoneRob (eds). Sex Education: School’s Out for Netflix. (2025). Bloomsbury Publishing. 276 pp. ISBN 979-8-7651-0731-7. Book Review: Sally Wainwright GortonKristynJohnsonBeth (2025). Sally Wainwright. Manchester University Press. 220pp. ISBN 9781526142870.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1