Accuracy of breath tests for colorectal neoplasms diagnosis: a meta-analysis.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY European Journal of Cancer Prevention Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000943
Lei Tian, Yizhe Wei, Yue Shi, Yiming Zhao, Jiang Chen, Xuan Liu, Bencheng Lin
{"title":"Accuracy of breath tests for colorectal neoplasms diagnosis: a meta-analysis.","authors":"Lei Tian, Yizhe Wei, Yue Shi, Yiming Zhao, Jiang Chen, Xuan Liu, Bencheng Lin","doi":"10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Early noninvasive and rapid screening for colorectal cancer critically influences treatment outcomes. Breath testing, as an emerging screening technology, allows for noninvasive and convenient screening for different biomarkers and is a reliable screening method for various diseases. In this study, a meta-analysis of the accuracy and current status of volatile organic compounds present in exhaled breath for colorectal cancer detection was performed. PubMed, Cochrane Library, and CNKI were searched for relevant studies. The quality of the studies was assessed using the QUADAS-2 criteria, and meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 and Stata 16. The pooled sensitivity is 90% [95% confidence interval (CI), 85-94%], the pooled specificity is 86% (95% CI, 72-93%), the pooled positive likelihood ratio is 6.3 (95% CI, 3.1-12.6), the negative likelihood ratio is 0.11 (95% CI, 0.07-0.17), and the diagnostic odds ratio is 56 (95% CI, 23-133). Summary receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed an area under the curve of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.91-0.95). The alteration of specific components of exhaled breath is associated with colorectal cancer development, and the selection of biomarkers and detection instruments influence the diagnostic value. What this paper adds to the literature: this meta-analysis provides a comprehensive evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of volatile organic compounds in breath tests for colorectal cancer, highlighting the influence of biomarker selection and detection methods on screening efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":11830,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cancer Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"528-533"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cancer Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000943","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Early noninvasive and rapid screening for colorectal cancer critically influences treatment outcomes. Breath testing, as an emerging screening technology, allows for noninvasive and convenient screening for different biomarkers and is a reliable screening method for various diseases. In this study, a meta-analysis of the accuracy and current status of volatile organic compounds present in exhaled breath for colorectal cancer detection was performed. PubMed, Cochrane Library, and CNKI were searched for relevant studies. The quality of the studies was assessed using the QUADAS-2 criteria, and meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 and Stata 16. The pooled sensitivity is 90% [95% confidence interval (CI), 85-94%], the pooled specificity is 86% (95% CI, 72-93%), the pooled positive likelihood ratio is 6.3 (95% CI, 3.1-12.6), the negative likelihood ratio is 0.11 (95% CI, 0.07-0.17), and the diagnostic odds ratio is 56 (95% CI, 23-133). Summary receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed an area under the curve of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.91-0.95). The alteration of specific components of exhaled breath is associated with colorectal cancer development, and the selection of biomarkers and detection instruments influence the diagnostic value. What this paper adds to the literature: this meta-analysis provides a comprehensive evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of volatile organic compounds in breath tests for colorectal cancer, highlighting the influence of biomarker selection and detection methods on screening efficacy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
呼吸试验对结直肠肿瘤诊断的准确性:一项荟萃分析。
结直肠癌的早期无创和快速筛查对治疗结果有重要影响。呼气测试作为一种新兴的筛查技术,可以无创、方便地筛查不同的生物标志物,是一种可靠的多种疾病的筛查方法。在这项研究中,进行了一项荟萃分析,分析了呼气中存在的挥发性有机化合物在结直肠癌检测中的准确性和现状。检索PubMed、Cochrane Library、CNKI等相关研究。采用QUADAS-2标准评估研究质量,使用RevMan 5.3和Stata 16进行meta分析。合并敏感性为90%[95%置信区间(CI), 85 ~ 94%],合并特异性为86% (95% CI, 72 ~ 93%),合并阳性似然比为6.3 (95% CI, 3.1 ~ 12.6),合并阴性似然比为0.11 (95% CI, 0.07 ~ 0.17),合并诊断优势比为56 (95% CI, 23 ~ 133)。综合受试者工作特征分析显示曲线下面积为0.94 (95% CI, 0.91-0.95)。呼出气体的特定成分的改变与结直肠癌的发展有关,生物标志物和检测仪器的选择影响诊断价值。本文对文献的补充:本荟萃分析提供了对结直肠癌呼吸测试中挥发性有机化合物诊断准确性的全面评估,突出了生物标志物选择和检测方法对筛查效果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
96
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: European Journal of Cancer Prevention aims to promote an increased awareness of all aspects of cancer prevention and to stimulate new ideas and innovations. The Journal has a wide-ranging scope, covering such aspects as descriptive and metabolic epidemiology, histopathology, genetics, biochemistry, molecular biology, microbiology, clinical medicine, intervention trials and public education, basic laboratory studies and special group studies. Although affiliated to a European organization, the journal addresses issues of international importance.
期刊最新文献
Development of a prediction model based on Hemoglobin, Albumin, Lymphocyte count, and Platelet-score for lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer. The global, regional, and national burden of colorectal cancer attributable to smoking from 1990 to 2021: a population-based study. High utilization of colonoscopy and fecal occult blood testing for screening or diagnostic purposes in Germany: a longitudinal analysis. Global and regional burden of kidney cancer due to high body index in adults from 1990 to 2021 and predictions to 2036. Burden and risk factors of colorectal cancer in Europe from 1990 to 2021.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1