Participation factors in a self-quantification program for family caregivers of community-dwelling older adults with long-term care in Japan.

IF 1.6 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES BMC Research Notes Pub Date : 2024-12-26 DOI:10.1186/s13104-024-07024-y
Tomoko Wakui, Satoko Fujihara, Yoko Moriyama, Takeshi Nakagawa, Suguru Okubo, Shuichi Obuchi, Shuichi Awata, Ichiro Kai
{"title":"Participation factors in a self-quantification program for family caregivers of community-dwelling older adults with long-term care in Japan.","authors":"Tomoko Wakui, Satoko Fujihara, Yoko Moriyama, Takeshi Nakagawa, Suguru Okubo, Shuichi Obuchi, Shuichi Awata, Ichiro Kai","doi":"10.1186/s13104-024-07024-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to examine the characteristics of participation in the self-quantification program for family caregivers (CGs) who provide long-term care to community-dwelling older adults. The family CGs, allocated based on the percentage of the nation's older population who needed care and met the inclusion criteria, who provided caregiving at least once a week for those aged 65 + and who were certified as needing care under the Japanese long-term care insurance program, were collected through online monitors. We compared the characteristics of the program participants and nonparticipants using logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2653 family CGs, including 195 study participants who engaged in self-quantification over 60 days and 2,458 nonparticipants who did not engage in self-quantification, were included in the analysis, with complete data available for all variables of interest. The survey included program participants who were predominantly male (55.9%), with an average age of 54.8 years (SD = 10.2). Participants tended to be fully employed (OR = 1.8; p < 0.01), but they were likely to experience greater burdens (OR = 1.8; p < 0.01) and daily caregiving demands (OR = 1.01; p < 0.01). This research highlights the potential efficacy of self-quantification programs for extensively burdened family CGs, illustrating that the requisites for support vary in accordance with the distinct characteristics of these CGs.</p>","PeriodicalId":9234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Research Notes","volume":"17 1","pages":"388"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11670400/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Research Notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-024-07024-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to examine the characteristics of participation in the self-quantification program for family caregivers (CGs) who provide long-term care to community-dwelling older adults. The family CGs, allocated based on the percentage of the nation's older population who needed care and met the inclusion criteria, who provided caregiving at least once a week for those aged 65 + and who were certified as needing care under the Japanese long-term care insurance program, were collected through online monitors. We compared the characteristics of the program participants and nonparticipants using logistic regression.

Results: A total of 2653 family CGs, including 195 study participants who engaged in self-quantification over 60 days and 2,458 nonparticipants who did not engage in self-quantification, were included in the analysis, with complete data available for all variables of interest. The survey included program participants who were predominantly male (55.9%), with an average age of 54.8 years (SD = 10.2). Participants tended to be fully employed (OR = 1.8; p < 0.01), but they were likely to experience greater burdens (OR = 1.8; p < 0.01) and daily caregiving demands (OR = 1.01; p < 0.01). This research highlights the potential efficacy of self-quantification programs for extensively burdened family CGs, illustrating that the requisites for support vary in accordance with the distinct characteristics of these CGs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
参与因素在一个自我量化计划的社区居住的老年人长期护理的家庭照顾者在日本。
目的:本研究旨在探讨为社区居住的老年人提供长期护理的家庭照顾者(CGs)参与自我量化计划的特征。家庭CGs是通过在线监视器收集的,根据日本需要护理且符合纳入标准、每周至少为65岁以上老人提供一次护理、并被日本长期护理保险计划认证为需要护理的老年人所占的比例进行分配。我们使用逻辑回归比较了项目参与者和非参与者的特征。结果:共有2653个家庭cg被纳入分析,其中包括195名参与60天以上自我量化的研究参与者和2458名未参与自我量化的非参与者,所有感兴趣的变量都有完整的数据。调查对象主要为男性(55.9%),平均年龄为54.8岁(SD = 10.2)。参与者倾向于充分就业(OR = 1.8;p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Research Notes
BMC Research Notes Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
363
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Research Notes publishes scientifically valid research outputs that cannot be considered as full research or methodology articles. We support the research community across all scientific and clinical disciplines by providing an open access forum for sharing data and useful information; this includes, but is not limited to, updates to previous work, additions to established methods, short publications, null results, research proposals and data management plans.
期刊最新文献
Cooking with confidence for autistic youth: outcomes from a pilot program evaluation model. Fecal microbiota changes associated with pathogenic and non-pathogenic diarrheas in foals. Remodeling the light-adapted electroretinogram using a bayesian statistical approach. Interrupted time series datasets from studies investigating the impact of interventions or exposures in public health and social science: a data note. Results comparison of cervical cancer early detection using cerviray ® with VIA test.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1