Managing Pharmaceutical Costs in Health Systems: A Review of Affordability, Accessibility and Sustainability Strategies.

Q2 Medicine Journal of market access & health policy Pub Date : 2024-12-10 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.3390/jmahp12040031
Christos Ntais, Michael A Talias, John Fanourgiakis, Nikolaos Kontodimopoulos
{"title":"Managing Pharmaceutical Costs in Health Systems: A Review of Affordability, Accessibility and Sustainability Strategies.","authors":"Christos Ntais, Michael A Talias, John Fanourgiakis, Nikolaos Kontodimopoulos","doi":"10.3390/jmahp12040031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This paper reviews cost containment policies to control pharmaceutical expenditure either by regulating the pharmaceutical industry or targeting the demand side.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The method used was the narrative literature review of studies which assessed the effect of pharmaceutical cost containment policies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Governments worldwide have implemented a great variety of policy measures to manage pharmaceutical expenditure while ensuring fair access to essential medicines. Cost-sharing schemes, value-based pricing, reimbursement, reference pricing, payback mechanisms and the substitution of original drugs with generics and biosimilars are pivotal in these efforts, albeit with differing effectiveness across healthcare systems. Overall, it appears that any gains may be outweighed by the unfavorable effects of policies impacting patients. Although interventions have been created to improve physicians' prescribing practice, they often achieve very minor benefits and at considerable cost. Policy measures pertaining to the regulation of the supply side must be supported by thorough evaluation in order to ascertain costs and effects and guarantee that unintended consequences are minimized.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Policymakers frequently enact numerous laws and regulations to control pharmaceutical expenditure, even if there is limited evidence that they are cost-effective. The most crucial component of any policy's success, regardless of the one selected, is its evaluation. Further research is needed to develop context-specific guidance that balances cost containment, equity and sustainability.</p>","PeriodicalId":73811,"journal":{"name":"Journal of market access & health policy","volume":"12 4","pages":"403-414"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11677551/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of market access & health policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jmahp12040031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This paper reviews cost containment policies to control pharmaceutical expenditure either by regulating the pharmaceutical industry or targeting the demand side.

Methods: The method used was the narrative literature review of studies which assessed the effect of pharmaceutical cost containment policies.

Results: Governments worldwide have implemented a great variety of policy measures to manage pharmaceutical expenditure while ensuring fair access to essential medicines. Cost-sharing schemes, value-based pricing, reimbursement, reference pricing, payback mechanisms and the substitution of original drugs with generics and biosimilars are pivotal in these efforts, albeit with differing effectiveness across healthcare systems. Overall, it appears that any gains may be outweighed by the unfavorable effects of policies impacting patients. Although interventions have been created to improve physicians' prescribing practice, they often achieve very minor benefits and at considerable cost. Policy measures pertaining to the regulation of the supply side must be supported by thorough evaluation in order to ascertain costs and effects and guarantee that unintended consequences are minimized.

Conclusions: Policymakers frequently enact numerous laws and regulations to control pharmaceutical expenditure, even if there is limited evidence that they are cost-effective. The most crucial component of any policy's success, regardless of the one selected, is its evaluation. Further research is needed to develop context-specific guidance that balances cost containment, equity and sustainability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
管理医药成本在卫生系统:可负担性,可及性和可持续性战略的审查。
背景:本文回顾了成本控制政策,以控制医药支出,无论是通过规范医药行业或针对需求方。方法:采用叙事性文献法对评价药品成本控制政策效果的研究进行综述。结果:世界各国政府已经实施了各种各样的政策措施来管理药品支出,同时确保公平获得基本药物。费用分摊计划、基于价值的定价、报销、参考定价、回报机制以及用仿制药和生物仿制药替代原药是这些努力的关键,尽管在不同的卫生保健系统中效果不同。总的来说,似乎任何收益都可能被影响患者的政策的不利影响所抵消。虽然干预措施是为了改善医生的处方实践,但它们往往收效甚微,而且成本相当高。与供应方面的管制有关的政策措施必须得到彻底评价的支持,以便确定成本和效果,并保证尽量减少意外后果。结论:决策者经常颁布大量的法律法规来控制药品支出,即使有有限的证据表明它们具有成本效益。任何政策成功的最关键因素,无论选择哪一项政策,都是对其进行评估。需要进行进一步研究,以制定针对具体情况的指导,平衡成本控制、公平和可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Managing Pharmaceutical Costs in Health Systems: A Review of Affordability, Accessibility and Sustainability Strategies. Operational Efficiency of Public Hospitals in Greece During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comparative Analysis Using DEA and AHP Models. Gatekeeping or Provider Choice for Sustainable Health Systems? A Literature Review on Their Impact on Efficiency, Access, and Quality of Services. Technology Assessment vs. Technology Appraisal-How to Strengthen the Science/Value Dichotomy with EU HTA? Economic Evidence on Cost Sharing and Alternative Insurance Designs to Address Moral and Behavioral Hazards in High-Income Health Care Systems: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1