Confirming gastric tube placement in neurocritical patients using the combined effects of end-tidal CO2 and pH testing: A prospective diagnostic study.

Yunxia Chen, Mengmin Xu, Yanwei Cheng, Shuaishuai Li, He Gao, Sha Kong, Chi Zhang, Xiaodi Hao, Mengli Yang
{"title":"Confirming gastric tube placement in neurocritical patients using the combined effects of end-tidal CO<sub>2</sub> and pH testing: A prospective diagnostic study.","authors":"Yunxia Chen, Mengmin Xu, Yanwei Cheng, Shuaishuai Li, He Gao, Sha Kong, Chi Zhang, Xiaodi Hao, Mengli Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the predictive effects of end-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure (PETCO<sub>2</sub>) in combination with pH measurement in confirming gastric tube placement in neurologically critical patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 105 patients with gastric tubes placed in the neurological intensive care unit of Henan Provincial People's Hospital between November 2023 and April 2024. By employing X-ray as a gold standard, we compared the predictive value of PETCO<sub>2</sub>, pH testing, or PETCO<sub>2</sub> in combination with pH measurement on the position of the tubes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of the three methods revealed varying diagnostic efficiencies. The PETCO<sub>2</sub> method exhibited low performance, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.714, sensitivity of 42.9 %, specificity of 100 %, positive predictive value (PPV) of 100 %, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 96.1 %. In contrast, the pH method demonstrated better diagnostic capability, with an AUC of 0.821, sensitivity of 71.4 %, specificity of 92.9 %, PPV of 41.7 %, and NPV of 97.8 %. PETCO<sub>2</sub> in combination with pH method showed the highest efficiency, achieving an AUC of 0.964, sensitivity of 100 %, specificity of 92.9 %, PPV of 50%, and NPV of 100 %.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using PETCO<sub>2</sub> combined with pH measurement to confirm gastric tube placement demonstrated high accuracy and reliability, consistent with X-ray results. This combined approach offers a reliable, non-invasive alternative to X-ray for confirming gastric tube placement in neurologically critical patients.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (Registration No. ChiCTR2300078001).</p>","PeriodicalId":94043,"journal":{"name":"Intensive & critical care nursing","volume":"88 ","pages":"103922"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive & critical care nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103922","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the predictive effects of end-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure (PETCO2) in combination with pH measurement in confirming gastric tube placement in neurologically critical patients.

Methods: This study included 105 patients with gastric tubes placed in the neurological intensive care unit of Henan Provincial People's Hospital between November 2023 and April 2024. By employing X-ray as a gold standard, we compared the predictive value of PETCO2, pH testing, or PETCO2 in combination with pH measurement on the position of the tubes.

Results: Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of the three methods revealed varying diagnostic efficiencies. The PETCO2 method exhibited low performance, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.714, sensitivity of 42.9 %, specificity of 100 %, positive predictive value (PPV) of 100 %, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 96.1 %. In contrast, the pH method demonstrated better diagnostic capability, with an AUC of 0.821, sensitivity of 71.4 %, specificity of 92.9 %, PPV of 41.7 %, and NPV of 97.8 %. PETCO2 in combination with pH method showed the highest efficiency, achieving an AUC of 0.964, sensitivity of 100 %, specificity of 92.9 %, PPV of 50%, and NPV of 100 %.

Conclusion: Using PETCO2 combined with pH measurement to confirm gastric tube placement demonstrated high accuracy and reliability, consistent with X-ray results. This combined approach offers a reliable, non-invasive alternative to X-ray for confirming gastric tube placement in neurologically critical patients.

Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (Registration No. ChiCTR2300078001).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用潮末CO2和pH检测的联合作用确认神经危重症患者胃管置入:一项前瞻性诊断研究。
目的:评价潮末二氧化碳分压(PETCO2)联合pH测定对神经危重症患者胃管置入的预测作用。方法:选取2023年11月至2024年4月在河南省人民医院神经内科重症监护病房放置胃管的105例患者为研究对象。通过采用x射线作为金标准,我们比较了PETCO2、pH测试或PETCO2结合pH测量对试管位置的预测价值。结果:三种方法的受者工作特征曲线分析显示不同的诊断效率。PETCO2法表现较差,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.714,灵敏度为42.9%,特异性为100%,阳性预测值(PPV)为100%,阴性预测值(NPV)为96.1%。pH法的AUC为0.821,敏感性为71.4%,特异性为92.9%,PPV为41.7%,NPV为97.8%。PETCO2联合pH法的检测效率最高,AUC为0.964,灵敏度为100%,特异性为92.9%,PPV为50%,NPV为100%。结论:PETCO2联合pH测量法确定胃管放置的准确性和可靠性高,与x线结果一致。这种联合方法为神经危重症患者确认胃管放置提供了可靠的、无创的x线替代方法。试验注册:中国临床试验注册中心(注册号:ChiCTR2300078001)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Global predictors of tracheostomy-related pressure injury in the COVID-19 era: A study of secondary data. Risk factors for colonisation by Multidrug-Resistant bacteria in critical care units. Independent risk factors for ventilator-associated pneumonia: A multi-ICU cohort study. Stepwise implementation of prevention strategies and their impact on ventilator-associated pneumonia incidence: A 13-Year observational surveillance study. Relationship between microaspiration and ventilator-associated events: A post-hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1