An updated network meta-analysis of non-pharmacological interventions for primary hypertension in adults: insights from recent studies.

IF 6.3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Systematic Reviews Pub Date : 2024-12-31 DOI:10.1186/s13643-024-02744-5
Ziwen Chen, Qifu Li, Tao Xu, Xueli Zhou, Yunjie Shu, Taipin Guo, Fanrong Liang
{"title":"An updated network meta-analysis of non-pharmacological interventions for primary hypertension in adults: insights from recent studies.","authors":"Ziwen Chen, Qifu Li, Tao Xu, Xueli Zhou, Yunjie Shu, Taipin Guo, Fanrong Liang","doi":"10.1186/s13643-024-02744-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary hypertension significantly impacts global cardiovascular health, contributing to increased mortality rates and posing a substantial public health challenge. Recognizing the growing evidence supporting non-pharmacological interventions (NPIs) for controlling primary hypertension, our study employs Network Meta-Analysis (NMA) to comprehensively assess their efficacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review updates a prior systematic review by searching for original literature on NPIs for primary hypertension from 2013 to 2024. We conducted a thorough search in eight databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, CNKI, WanFang Data, and Chongqing VIP, identifying potential randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from January 1, 2013, to August 1, 2024. Primary outcomes included the mean changes in blood pressure before and after treatment. Analysis was performed using GeMTC package (R 4.2.3), and Stata 17.0. The confidence of evidence was examined using Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Utilizing NMA, we reviewed 9,189 studies, identifying 54 eligible articles with 5,827 participants. Investigating 22 distinct NPIs, the focus was on changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure pre and post-treatment. Lifestyle intervention + Tai Chi significantly reduced systolic (-21.75 mm Hg; 95% CI -33.25 to -10.02) and diastolic blood pressure (-13.62 mm Hg; 95% CI -23.14 to -3.71) compared to usual care and other NPIs. Consistency and regression analyses did not reveal significant differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review provides a comprehensive evaluation of NPIs for primary hypertension, emphasizing lifestyle + Tai Chi as a preferred NPI. Breathing exercises show potential in lowering systolic blood pressure, and acupuncture + tui na demonstrates effectiveness in reducing diastolic blood pressure, outperforming other interventions. The study reinforces the role of NPIs in managing primary hypertension, providing a foundation for future hypertension research.</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"13 1","pages":"318"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11686877/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02744-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Primary hypertension significantly impacts global cardiovascular health, contributing to increased mortality rates and posing a substantial public health challenge. Recognizing the growing evidence supporting non-pharmacological interventions (NPIs) for controlling primary hypertension, our study employs Network Meta-Analysis (NMA) to comprehensively assess their efficacy.

Methods: This review updates a prior systematic review by searching for original literature on NPIs for primary hypertension from 2013 to 2024. We conducted a thorough search in eight databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, CNKI, WanFang Data, and Chongqing VIP, identifying potential randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from January 1, 2013, to August 1, 2024. Primary outcomes included the mean changes in blood pressure before and after treatment. Analysis was performed using GeMTC package (R 4.2.3), and Stata 17.0. The confidence of evidence was examined using Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA).

Results: Utilizing NMA, we reviewed 9,189 studies, identifying 54 eligible articles with 5,827 participants. Investigating 22 distinct NPIs, the focus was on changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure pre and post-treatment. Lifestyle intervention + Tai Chi significantly reduced systolic (-21.75 mm Hg; 95% CI -33.25 to -10.02) and diastolic blood pressure (-13.62 mm Hg; 95% CI -23.14 to -3.71) compared to usual care and other NPIs. Consistency and regression analyses did not reveal significant differences.

Conclusion: This review provides a comprehensive evaluation of NPIs for primary hypertension, emphasizing lifestyle + Tai Chi as a preferred NPI. Breathing exercises show potential in lowering systolic blood pressure, and acupuncture + tui na demonstrates effectiveness in reducing diastolic blood pressure, outperforming other interventions. The study reinforces the role of NPIs in managing primary hypertension, providing a foundation for future hypertension research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成人原发性高血压非药物干预的最新网络荟萃分析:来自最近研究的见解。
背景:原发性高血压显著影响全球心血管健康,导致死亡率上升,并构成重大的公共卫生挑战。认识到越来越多的证据支持非药物干预(npi)控制原发性高血压,我们的研究采用网络荟萃分析(NMA)来全面评估其疗效。方法:本综述通过检索2013年至2024年npi治疗原发性高血压的原始文献,更新了先前的系统综述。我们对PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials、Allied and Complementary Medicine Database、CNKI、万方数据、Chongqing VIP等8个数据库进行了全面检索,确定了2013年1月1日至2024年8月1日的潜在随机对照试验(RCTs)。主要结局包括治疗前后血压的平均变化。使用GeMTC软件包(R 4.2.3)和Stata 17.0进行分析。使用网络元分析的可信度(CINeMA)来检验证据的可信度。结果:利用NMA,我们回顾了9,189项研究,确定了54篇符合条件的文章,涉及5,827名参与者。研究22种不同的npi,重点是治疗前后收缩压和舒张压的变化。生活方式干预+太极显著降低收缩压(-21.75 mm Hg;95% CI -33.25 ~ -10.02)和舒张压(-13.62 mm Hg;95% CI -23.14至-3.71),与常规护理和其他npi相比。一致性和回归分析没有显示显著差异。结论:本综述对原发性高血压的NPI进行了全面评价,强调生活方式+太极是首选的NPI。呼吸练习显示出降低收缩压的潜力,针灸+推拿显示出降低舒张压的有效性,优于其他干预措施。本研究强化了npi在原发性高血压治疗中的作用,为今后的高血压研究奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Systematic Reviews
Systematic Reviews Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
241
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy and safety of corticosteroids for stroke and traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultra-processed foods and risk of all-cause mortality: an updated systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Using virtual patients to enhance empathy in medical students: a scoping review protocol. Research priority setting for implementation science and practice: a living systematic review protocol. Self-care interventions among women with gestational diabetes mellitus in low and middle-income countries: a scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1