The Relationship of Religious Coping with Psychological Well-being, Psychological Resilience, and Grief Severity in Women Who Had Experienced Perinatal Loss in Türkiye.

IF 2.2 1区 哲学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Religion & Health Pub Date : 2024-12-30 DOI:10.1007/s10943-024-02240-z
Kevser Altuner, Seyhan Çankaya
{"title":"The Relationship of Religious Coping with Psychological Well-being, Psychological Resilience, and Grief Severity in Women Who Had Experienced Perinatal Loss in Türkiye.","authors":"Kevser Altuner, Seyhan Çankaya","doi":"10.1007/s10943-024-02240-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between religious coping strategies and three key variables: psychological well-being, psychological resilience, and grief intensity, in a sample of women who had experienced perinatal loss. The study was designed as a descriptive and correlational study. The study was completed by reaching 208 (approximately 68.1%) of the 305 women who experienced perinatal loss. Data were collected using the Personal Information Form, the Religious Coping Scale, the Psychological Well-Being Scale, the Psychological Resilience Scale, and the Perinatal Grief Scale. Bivariate analysis revealed a positive relationship of positive religious coping with psychological well-being and psychological resilience. Conversely, a negative relationship was found with perinatal grief and its sub-dimensions (p < 0.001). Furthermore, while there was negative correlation between women's negative religious coping and psychological well-being (p < 0.001), there was positive correlation between the total scale score of perinatal grief (p = 0.034) and its subscale, difficulty in coping (p = 0.003). Concurrently, the regression analysis revealed that positive religious coping was a significant predictor of enhanced psychological well-being and resilience in women, while concurrently mitigating perinatal grief (F = 281.515, p < 0.001). The study revealed that religious coping strategies employed by women who had experienced perinatal loss led to an enhancement in their psychological well-being and resilience, as well as a favorable impact on their ability to cope with perinatal grief.</p>","PeriodicalId":48054,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Religion & Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Religion & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-024-02240-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between religious coping strategies and three key variables: psychological well-being, psychological resilience, and grief intensity, in a sample of women who had experienced perinatal loss. The study was designed as a descriptive and correlational study. The study was completed by reaching 208 (approximately 68.1%) of the 305 women who experienced perinatal loss. Data were collected using the Personal Information Form, the Religious Coping Scale, the Psychological Well-Being Scale, the Psychological Resilience Scale, and the Perinatal Grief Scale. Bivariate analysis revealed a positive relationship of positive religious coping with psychological well-being and psychological resilience. Conversely, a negative relationship was found with perinatal grief and its sub-dimensions (p < 0.001). Furthermore, while there was negative correlation between women's negative religious coping and psychological well-being (p < 0.001), there was positive correlation between the total scale score of perinatal grief (p = 0.034) and its subscale, difficulty in coping (p = 0.003). Concurrently, the regression analysis revealed that positive religious coping was a significant predictor of enhanced psychological well-being and resilience in women, while concurrently mitigating perinatal grief (F = 281.515, p < 0.001). The study revealed that religious coping strategies employed by women who had experienced perinatal loss led to an enhancement in their psychological well-being and resilience, as well as a favorable impact on their ability to cope with perinatal grief.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
21.40%
发文量
220
期刊介绍: Journal of Religion and Health is an international publication concerned with the creative partnership of psychology and religion/sprituality and the relationship between religion/spirituality and both mental and physical health. This multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary journal publishes peer-reviewed original contributions from scholars and professionals of all religious faiths. Articles may be clinical, statistical, theoretical, impressionistic, or anecdotal. Founded in 1961 by the Blanton-Peale Institute, which joins the perspectives of psychology and religion, Journal of Religion and Health explores the most contemporary modes of religious thought with particular emphasis on their relevance to current medical and psychological research.
期刊最新文献
Perspectives Toward COVID-19 Sanctions in the Orthodox Jewish Community in Brooklyn and Queens: A Qualitative Study of Medical Providers Experience. Religion as a Functional Equivalent of Medicine: Religious Experiences of Family Caregivers of People with Chronic Illnesses in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Assessing the Power of the HEXACO to Predict Professional Burnout Among Catholic Priests in Italy. The Relationship of Religious Coping with Psychological Well-being, Psychological Resilience, and Grief Severity in Women Who Had Experienced Perinatal Loss in Türkiye. Understanding and Addressing Morally Injurious Events of Healthcare Chaplains in Texas: Insights for Health and Well-Being.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1