The Italian Version of the Ward Safety and Security Rules Survey for Mental Health Nurses: A Validity Study.

IF 0.7 Q4 NURSING Journal of nursing measurement Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI:10.1891/JNM-2024-0076
Giuliano Anastasi, Roberto Latina, Rosario Caruso, Alessandro Stievano, Stefano Bambi
{"title":"The Italian Version of the Ward Safety and Security Rules Survey for Mental Health Nurses: A Validity Study.","authors":"Giuliano Anastasi, Roberto Latina, Rosario Caruso, Alessandro Stievano, Stefano Bambi","doi":"10.1891/JNM-2024-0076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and Purpose:</b> Ensuring safety in psychiatry is crucial, but practices vary widely. This study aimed to validate the Italian version of the Ward Safety and Security Rules Survey (WSSRS-I). <b>Methods:</b> The validation process included cultural-linguistic adaptation, followed by content and face validation. Fifteen experts assessed content validity using the content validity ratio (CVR) and content validity index (item level [I-CVI] and scale level [S-CVI]), adjusted for chance agreement (k*). Five psychiatric nurses evaluated face validity. <b>Results:</b> The WSSRS-I achieved substantial agreement on cultural-linguistic adaptation (Fleiss's kappa = .85) and item relevance (CVRs = .60-1; I-CVIs = .73-1; k* = .72-1; S-CVI = 0.90). Psychiatric nurses confirmed WSSRS-I appropriateness. <b>Conclusions:</b> The WSSRS-I demonstrated adequate content and face validity. It provides a tool to assess safety measures in Italian psychiatric settings, enhancing psychiatric nursing practices and research.</p>","PeriodicalId":16585,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nursing measurement","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nursing measurement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/JNM-2024-0076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Ensuring safety in psychiatry is crucial, but practices vary widely. This study aimed to validate the Italian version of the Ward Safety and Security Rules Survey (WSSRS-I). Methods: The validation process included cultural-linguistic adaptation, followed by content and face validation. Fifteen experts assessed content validity using the content validity ratio (CVR) and content validity index (item level [I-CVI] and scale level [S-CVI]), adjusted for chance agreement (k*). Five psychiatric nurses evaluated face validity. Results: The WSSRS-I achieved substantial agreement on cultural-linguistic adaptation (Fleiss's kappa = .85) and item relevance (CVRs = .60-1; I-CVIs = .73-1; k* = .72-1; S-CVI = 0.90). Psychiatric nurses confirmed WSSRS-I appropriateness. Conclusions: The WSSRS-I demonstrated adequate content and face validity. It provides a tool to assess safety measures in Italian psychiatric settings, enhancing psychiatric nursing practices and research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
背景与目的:确保精神病科的安全至关重要,但在实践中却存在很大差异。本研究旨在验证意大利语版本的病房安全与保安规则调查(WSSRS-I)。方法:验证过程包括文化-语言调整,然后是内容和表面验证。15 位专家使用内容效度比(CVR)和内容效度指数(项目水平 [I-CVI] 和量表水平 [S-CVI])评估了内容效度,并对偶然一致性(k*)进行了调整。五名精神科护士对表面效度进行了评估。结果:WSSRS-I 在文化语言适应性(Fleiss's kappa = .85)和项目相关性(CVRs = .60-1;I-CVIs = .73-1;k* = .72-1;S-CVI = 0.90)方面取得了实质性一致。精神科护士确认了 WSSRS-I 的适当性。结论:WSSRS-I 具有充分的内容效度和表面效度。它为评估意大利精神科环境中的安全措施提供了一种工具,有助于加强精神科护理实践和研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nursing Measurement specifically addresses instrumentation in nursing. It serves as a prime forum for disseminating information on instruments, tools, approaches, and procedures developed or utilized for measuring variables in nursing research, practice, and education. Particular emphasis is placed on evidence for the reliability and validity or sensitivity and specificity of such instruments. The journal includes innovative discussions of theories, principles, practices, and issues relevant to nursing measurement.
期刊最新文献
Exploratory Factor Analysis of the Moulage Authenticity Rating Scale and Proposed Adaptations. Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Foot Health Assessment Instrument in Pregnant Women. Instruments Important to Help Increase Diversity Equity and Inclusion. The Italian Version of the Ward Safety and Security Rules Survey for Mental Health Nurses: A Validity Study. Development of the Followership Evaluation Instrument for Nurses: A Prospective Longitudinal Survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1