Quantification of valvular regurgitation by transthoracic 3D high pulse repetition frequency Doppler echocardiography.

European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice Pub Date : 2024-12-18 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1093/ehjimp/qyae138
Erik Andreas Rye Berg, Stefano Fiorentini, Jørgen Avdal, Bjørnar Grenne, Knut Haakon Stensæth, Peter Thomas While, Torvald Espeland, Rune Wiseth, Hans Torp, Svend Aakhus
{"title":"Quantification of valvular regurgitation by transthoracic 3D high pulse repetition frequency Doppler echocardiography.","authors":"Erik Andreas Rye Berg, Stefano Fiorentini, Jørgen Avdal, Bjørnar Grenne, Knut Haakon Stensæth, Peter Thomas While, Torvald Espeland, Rune Wiseth, Hans Torp, Svend Aakhus","doi":"10.1093/ehjimp/qyae138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To improve quantification of valvular regurgitation, a 3D high-pulse repetition frequency Doppler (3D HPRFD) method was developed for regurgitant volume (RVol) estimation from transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). Although successfully applied <i>in vitro</i> and in selected clinical cases, a systematic clinical validation of 3D HPRFD has not been published. Hence, our aims were to investigate (i) feasibility of 3D HPRFD and (ii) correlation between 3D HPRFD and RVol estimates obtained by the 2D proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in patients with either aortic regurgitation (AR) or mitral regurgitation (MR).</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We included 45 patients with AR (42% mild, 40% moderate, and 18% severe) and 45 with MR (67% mild, 24% moderate, and 9% severe). Median time between start of TTE and start of CMR was 1.5 h, minimizing changes in load. Overall feasibility of 3D HPRFD was 56% in AR and 44% in MR. Feasibility was only 25% in patients with severe regurgitation. In AR, estimated RVol from 3D HPRF did not correlate with estimated RVol from PISA or CMR [Spearman <i>rho</i> = 0.06 (<i>P</i> = 0.78) and 0.04 (<i>P</i> = 0.4), respectively]. In MR, RVol estimates from 3D HPRFD correlated with PISA (<i>rho</i> = 0.72, <i>P</i> < 0.001) but not with CMR (<i>rho</i> = 0.31, <i>P</i> = 0.43).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Regurgitant volume estimation by 3D HPRFD had a low feasibility, especially in severe regurgitation, and in general correlated poorly with PISA and CMR estimates. In its current state, 3D HPRFD is not ready for clinical use.</p>","PeriodicalId":94317,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice","volume":"2 3","pages":"qyae138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11694712/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjimp/qyae138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To improve quantification of valvular regurgitation, a 3D high-pulse repetition frequency Doppler (3D HPRFD) method was developed for regurgitant volume (RVol) estimation from transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). Although successfully applied in vitro and in selected clinical cases, a systematic clinical validation of 3D HPRFD has not been published. Hence, our aims were to investigate (i) feasibility of 3D HPRFD and (ii) correlation between 3D HPRFD and RVol estimates obtained by the 2D proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in patients with either aortic regurgitation (AR) or mitral regurgitation (MR).

Methods and results: We included 45 patients with AR (42% mild, 40% moderate, and 18% severe) and 45 with MR (67% mild, 24% moderate, and 9% severe). Median time between start of TTE and start of CMR was 1.5 h, minimizing changes in load. Overall feasibility of 3D HPRFD was 56% in AR and 44% in MR. Feasibility was only 25% in patients with severe regurgitation. In AR, estimated RVol from 3D HPRF did not correlate with estimated RVol from PISA or CMR [Spearman rho = 0.06 (P = 0.78) and 0.04 (P = 0.4), respectively]. In MR, RVol estimates from 3D HPRFD correlated with PISA (rho = 0.72, P < 0.001) but not with CMR (rho = 0.31, P = 0.43).

Conclusion: Regurgitant volume estimation by 3D HPRFD had a low feasibility, especially in severe regurgitation, and in general correlated poorly with PISA and CMR estimates. In its current state, 3D HPRFD is not ready for clinical use.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经胸三维高脉冲重复频率多普勒超声心动图定量评价瓣膜反流。
目的:为了提高瓣膜性反流的量化,建立了一种三维高脉冲重复频率多普勒(3D HPRFD)方法,用于经胸超声心动图(TTE)估计反流容积(RVol)。尽管3D HPRFD在体外和选定的临床病例中成功应用,但尚未发表系统的临床验证。因此,我们的目的是研究(i) 3D HPRFD的可行性和(ii) 3D HPRFD与主动脉瓣反流(AR)或二尖瓣反流(MR)患者通过2D近端等速表面积(PISA)方法和心脏磁共振(CMR)获得的RVol估计之间的相关性。方法和结果:我们纳入了45例AR患者(42%为轻度,40%为中度,18%为重度)和45例MR患者(67%为轻度,24%为中度,9%为重度)。从TTE开始到CMR开始的中位时间为1.5小时,负荷变化最小。3D HPRFD的总体可行性在AR中为56%,在mr中为44%,在严重反流患者中仅为25%。在AR中,3D HPRF估计的RVol与PISA或CMR估计的RVol不相关[Spearman rho分别= 0.06 (P = 0.78)和0.04 (P = 0.4)]。在MR中,3D HPRFD的RVol估计值与PISA相关(rho = 0.72, P < 0.001),但与CMR无关(rho = 0.31, P = 0.43)。结论:3D HPRFD估计反流体积的可行性较低,特别是在严重反流时,通常与PISA和CMR估计相关性较差。在目前的状态下,3D HPRFD还不能用于临床。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cardiac imaging highlights from European Society of Cardiology 2024: the future is within our grasp! Prediction of tricuspid regurgitation regression after mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair using three-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography. Clinical significance of the estimation of pulmonary-right ventricular uncoupling in patients with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy. Coronary complications in Kawasaki disease: giant aneurysms and thrombosis leading to myocardial infarction. Echocardiography of the right heart in pulmonary arterial hypertension: insights from the ULTRA RIGHT VALUE study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1