A feasibility study of measuring maternal anaemia and postoperative outcomes after caesarean section.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Pub Date : 2025-01-06 DOI:10.1177/0310057X241275127
Mark O'Donnell, Alicia T Dennis
{"title":"A feasibility study of measuring maternal anaemia and postoperative outcomes after caesarean section.","authors":"Mark O'Donnell, Alicia T Dennis","doi":"10.1177/0310057X241275127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>SummaryIron-deficiency anaemia (IDA) is a global health problem. The impact of IDA on outcomes in obstetric patients who undergo caesarean section (CS) is unknown. We assessed the feasibility of conducting a large study to investigate perioperative anaemia and outcomes after CS. With ethics approval and trial registration, 60 obstetric patients (30 planned CS, 30 emergency CS) were included. Feasibility categories were willingness to participate in a study, to undergo additional blood tests (haemoglobin, ferritin), to have weight measured and to undertake quality of recovery (QoR) questionnaires. Of eligible people approached, 100% agreed to participate and 100% would participate in a future study. Ninety percent (95% confidence interval (CI) 82.4% to 97.6%) and 83% (95% CI 73.9% to 92.7%) agreed to additional tests in hospital and after discharge, respectively. Ninety-eight per cent (95% CI 95.1% to 100%) consented to being weighed, and 100% completed QoR questionnaires. Preoperatively, 8.5% (95% CI 1.4% to 15.6%) of participants were anaemic. Postoperative haemoglobin was measured in only 22 (36.7%, 95% CI 24.5% to 48.9%) participants, and 40.9% (95% CI 20.4% to 61.5%) were anaemic, suggesting at least a quadrupling of the proportion of anaemic patients from pre- to postoperatively. Ferritin was not measured postoperatively in any participant. The prevalence of participants discharged with IDA was unquantifiable. Postoperative IDA in obstetric patients is likely to be a serious problem that is currently unrecognised. Our data suggest that a definitive study to determine associations between maternal anaemia and perioperative outcomes after CS surgery is feasible.</p>","PeriodicalId":7746,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care","volume":" ","pages":"310057X241275127"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057X241275127","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

SummaryIron-deficiency anaemia (IDA) is a global health problem. The impact of IDA on outcomes in obstetric patients who undergo caesarean section (CS) is unknown. We assessed the feasibility of conducting a large study to investigate perioperative anaemia and outcomes after CS. With ethics approval and trial registration, 60 obstetric patients (30 planned CS, 30 emergency CS) were included. Feasibility categories were willingness to participate in a study, to undergo additional blood tests (haemoglobin, ferritin), to have weight measured and to undertake quality of recovery (QoR) questionnaires. Of eligible people approached, 100% agreed to participate and 100% would participate in a future study. Ninety percent (95% confidence interval (CI) 82.4% to 97.6%) and 83% (95% CI 73.9% to 92.7%) agreed to additional tests in hospital and after discharge, respectively. Ninety-eight per cent (95% CI 95.1% to 100%) consented to being weighed, and 100% completed QoR questionnaires. Preoperatively, 8.5% (95% CI 1.4% to 15.6%) of participants were anaemic. Postoperative haemoglobin was measured in only 22 (36.7%, 95% CI 24.5% to 48.9%) participants, and 40.9% (95% CI 20.4% to 61.5%) were anaemic, suggesting at least a quadrupling of the proportion of anaemic patients from pre- to postoperatively. Ferritin was not measured postoperatively in any participant. The prevalence of participants discharged with IDA was unquantifiable. Postoperative IDA in obstetric patients is likely to be a serious problem that is currently unrecognised. Our data suggest that a definitive study to determine associations between maternal anaemia and perioperative outcomes after CS surgery is feasible.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
测量剖宫产后产妇贫血与术后结局的可行性研究。
缺铁性贫血是一个全球性的健康问题。IDA对接受剖腹产(CS)的产科患者预后的影响尚不清楚。我们评估了开展一项大型研究以调查CS术后围手术期贫血和预后的可行性。经伦理批准和试验注册,纳入了60名产科患者(30名计划CS, 30名急诊CS)。可行性类别包括是否愿意参加研究、是否愿意接受额外的血液检查(血红蛋白、铁蛋白)、是否愿意测量体重和是否愿意接受康复质量问卷调查。在所接触的符合条件的人中,100%的人同意参加并且100%的人将参加未来的研究。90%(95%置信区间(CI) 82.4%至97.6%)和83%(95%置信区间(CI) 73.9%至92.7%)分别同意在医院和出院后进行额外的检测。98% (95% CI 95.1%至100%)同意称重,100%完成QoR问卷。术前,8.5% (95% CI 1.4% ~ 15.6%)的参与者贫血。术后只有22名参与者(36.7%,95% CI 24.5% - 48.9%)测量了血红蛋白,40.9% (95% CI 20.4% - 61.5%)贫血,这表明贫血患者的比例从术前到术后至少翻了两番。所有参与者术后均未测量铁蛋白。以IDA出院的参与者的患病率无法量化。产科患者术后IDA可能是一个严重的问题,目前尚未认识到。我们的数据表明,一项确定CS术后产妇贫血与围手术期预后之间关系的明确研究是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
150
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Anaesthesia and Intensive Care is an international journal publishing timely, peer reviewed articles that have educational value and scientific merit for clinicians and researchers associated with anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, and pain medicine.
期刊最新文献
Experiences of Australian anaesthetists and anaesthetic trainees of working whilst pregnant: Results of a national survey. Perioperative anaphylaxis in Malaysia: A nine-year retrospective study. The elective use of percutaneous transtracheal oxygen insufflation for laryngeal surgery in a patient with a known difficult airway. Effects of polymyxin B haemoperfusion on septic shock caused by Gram-positive bacteria. The Bruck inhaler: An ether inhaler misattributed to Ludwig Bruck, an Australian medical publisher and supplier of medical equipment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1