Two-year clinical performance of an alkasite direct restorative material in Class I and II cavities without using an adhesive resin: A prospective single-arm clinical trial.
Funda Ö Bozkurt, Tuğba Toz-Akalin, Alev Özsoy-Kaner, Mahmut Kuşdemir, Mutlu Özcan
{"title":"Two-year clinical performance of an alkasite direct restorative material in Class I and II cavities without using an adhesive resin: A prospective single-arm clinical trial.","authors":"Funda Ö Bozkurt, Tuğba Toz-Akalin, Alev Özsoy-Kaner, Mahmut Kuşdemir, Mutlu Özcan","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the clinical performance of an alkasite material for Class I and Class II cavities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>50 subjects (30 females, 20 males; mean age: 28.7) referred to the Department of Restorative Dentistry, Medipol University, Dental School, Istanbul, Turkey, received 89 Class I and II restorations (Cention N) by two trained operators. All restorations were made in bulk application without an adhesive resin and without photo-polymerization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>65 restorations were followed in 37 subjects at a 2-year recall. The mean observation period was 27.6 months. 24 restorations (13 subjects) were not followed up at the 2-year recall and were considered as drop out. The restorations were made either due to primary caries (n= 73) or restoration replacement (n= 16). 89 restorations were placed of which 51 were in the maxilla and 38 in the mandible. In deep cavities, a cavity liner was applied (with n= 53; without n= 36). Hypersensitivity was observed in nine cases that disappeared at the latest after 1 month. No debonding, no fracture, and no endodontic complications were observed at 6-month and 1-year recalls whereas four partial retention losses and one pulpal complication occurred at the 2-year recall. The overall survival rate was 88.9% with a mean observation time of 27.6 months (Kaplan-Meier, Log Rank; Mantel-Cox) (95%CI=31.07-32.25).</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>This study provided promising evidence for application of alkasite material applied in bulk without retentive features, etching or an adhesive system.</p>","PeriodicalId":7538,"journal":{"name":"American journal of dentistry","volume":"37 6","pages":"317-324"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the clinical performance of an alkasite material for Class I and Class II cavities.
Methods: 50 subjects (30 females, 20 males; mean age: 28.7) referred to the Department of Restorative Dentistry, Medipol University, Dental School, Istanbul, Turkey, received 89 Class I and II restorations (Cention N) by two trained operators. All restorations were made in bulk application without an adhesive resin and without photo-polymerization.
Results: 65 restorations were followed in 37 subjects at a 2-year recall. The mean observation period was 27.6 months. 24 restorations (13 subjects) were not followed up at the 2-year recall and were considered as drop out. The restorations were made either due to primary caries (n= 73) or restoration replacement (n= 16). 89 restorations were placed of which 51 were in the maxilla and 38 in the mandible. In deep cavities, a cavity liner was applied (with n= 53; without n= 36). Hypersensitivity was observed in nine cases that disappeared at the latest after 1 month. No debonding, no fracture, and no endodontic complications were observed at 6-month and 1-year recalls whereas four partial retention losses and one pulpal complication occurred at the 2-year recall. The overall survival rate was 88.9% with a mean observation time of 27.6 months (Kaplan-Meier, Log Rank; Mantel-Cox) (95%CI=31.07-32.25).
Clinical significance: This study provided promising evidence for application of alkasite material applied in bulk without retentive features, etching or an adhesive system.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Dentistry, published by Mosher & Linder, Inc., provides peer-reviewed scientific articles with clinical significance for the general dental practitioner.