Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Equivalence of Biosimilar and Reference Ultra-Rapid Lispro: A Comparative Clamp Study in Healthy Volunteers

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development Pub Date : 2025-01-07 DOI:10.1002/cpdd.1497
Sergei Noskov, Ekaterina Koksharova, Anna Arefeva, Veniamin Banko, Kseniia Radaeva, Iuliia Matvienko, Maria Gefen, Igor Makarenko, Roman Drai
{"title":"Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Equivalence of Biosimilar and Reference Ultra-Rapid Lispro: A Comparative Clamp Study in Healthy Volunteers","authors":"Sergei Noskov,&nbsp;Ekaterina Koksharova,&nbsp;Anna Arefeva,&nbsp;Veniamin Banko,&nbsp;Kseniia Radaeva,&nbsp;Iuliia Matvienko,&nbsp;Maria Gefen,&nbsp;Igor Makarenko,&nbsp;Roman Drai","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.1497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ultra-rapid insulin lispro is an innovative insulin analogue designed to achieve rapid onset and short duration of action, aimed at optimizing glycemic control in patients with diabetes. This was a double-blind, randomized, 2-period, crossover clamp study to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD), along with safety profiles, of a potential biosimilar ultra-rapid insulin lispro compared to the reference product in healthy White men. A total of 35 healthy volunteers completed hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp procedures across both study periods. Blood samples were collected at predefined intervals up to 8 hours to assess PK parameters. Plasma glucose levels were monitored every 5 minutes during the 8-hour clamps, with adjustments to the glucose infusion rate to maintain the target range. Insulin quantification in plasma was conducted using a validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method. PD assessment was based on glucose infusion rate profiles during both clamps. Geometric mean ratios for maximum plasma concentration and area under the concentration-time curve from insulin administration to the last measurable concentration for the test and reference drugs fell within the bioequivalence range of 80%-125%. Furthermore, the investigational drugs demonstrated comparable PK/PD profiles of insulin lispro. Both formulations exhibited similar safety profiles primarily characterized by mild injection site reactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"14 2","pages":"144-153"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://accp1.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpdd.1497","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ultra-rapid insulin lispro is an innovative insulin analogue designed to achieve rapid onset and short duration of action, aimed at optimizing glycemic control in patients with diabetes. This was a double-blind, randomized, 2-period, crossover clamp study to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD), along with safety profiles, of a potential biosimilar ultra-rapid insulin lispro compared to the reference product in healthy White men. A total of 35 healthy volunteers completed hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp procedures across both study periods. Blood samples were collected at predefined intervals up to 8 hours to assess PK parameters. Plasma glucose levels were monitored every 5 minutes during the 8-hour clamps, with adjustments to the glucose infusion rate to maintain the target range. Insulin quantification in plasma was conducted using a validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method. PD assessment was based on glucose infusion rate profiles during both clamps. Geometric mean ratios for maximum plasma concentration and area under the concentration-time curve from insulin administration to the last measurable concentration for the test and reference drugs fell within the bioequivalence range of 80%-125%. Furthermore, the investigational drugs demonstrated comparable PK/PD profiles of insulin lispro. Both formulations exhibited similar safety profiles primarily characterized by mild injection site reactions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生物仿制药和参比超快速利斯普罗在健康志愿者体内的药代动力学和药效学等效性比较研究。
超快速胰岛素lispro是一种创新的胰岛素类似物,旨在实现快速起效和短时间的作用,旨在优化糖尿病患者的血糖控制。这是一项双盲,随机,2期,交叉钳夹研究,以评估潜在的生物仿制药超快速胰岛素lispro与参考产品在健康白人男性中的药代动力学(PK)和药效学(PD)以及安全性。在两个研究期间,共有35名健康志愿者完成了高胰岛素正糖钳夹手术。每隔8小时采集血液样本以评估PK参数。在8小时钳夹期间每5分钟监测一次血糖水平,并调整葡萄糖输注速率以维持目标范围。血浆胰岛素定量采用经验证的酶联免疫吸附测定法。PD评估是基于两个钳夹期间的葡萄糖输注速率谱。从胰岛素给药到试验药物和参比药物的最后可测浓度,最大血浆浓度和浓度-时间曲线下面积的几何平均比值均在80%-125%的生物等效性范围内。此外,研究药物显示出与胰岛素利斯普罗相当的PK/PD谱。两种制剂均表现出相似的安全性,主要特点是注射部位反应轻微。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
154
期刊介绍: Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development is an international, peer-reviewed, online publication focused on publishing high-quality clinical pharmacology studies in drug development which are primarily (but not exclusively) performed in early development phases in healthy subjects.
期刊最新文献
Pharmacokinetics, Bioequivalence, and Safety Evaluation of Two Voriconazole Tablets in Healthy Chinese Volunteers A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled QTc Study to Evaluate BIA 28–6156 Effect on Cardiac Repolarization in Healthy Volunteers Steady-State Pharmacokinetic Properties of TNX-102 SL, a Sublingual Tablet Formulation of Cyclobenzaprine Hydrochloride (HCl), With Daily Dosing in Healthy Volunteers: A Randomized, Open-Label Trial Are We Overstudying Biosimilars? Re-Centering Clinical Pharmacology in the Demonstration of Similarity Bioequivalence and Safety Assessment of Brivaracetam Dry Syrup Compared With Tablets in Healthy Japanese Participants: Results From Two Randomized Single- and Multiple-Dose Trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1