Mapping simulated visual field defects with movie-viewing pupil perimetry.

Yuqing Cai, Christoph Strauch, Stefan Van der Stigchel, Antonia F Ten Brink, Frans W Cornelissen, Marnix Naber
{"title":"Mapping simulated visual field defects with movie-viewing pupil perimetry.","authors":"Yuqing Cai, Christoph Strauch, Stefan Van der Stigchel, Antonia F Ten Brink, Frans W Cornelissen, Marnix Naber","doi":"10.1007/s00417-024-06733-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Assessing the quality of the visual field is important for the diagnosis of ophthalmic and neurological diseases and, consequently, for rehabilitation. Visual field defects (VFDs) are typically assessed using standard automated perimetry (SAP). However, SAP requires participants to understand instructions, maintain fixation and sustained attention, and provide overt responses. These aspects make SAP less suitable for very young or cognitively impaired populations. Here we investigate the feasibility of a new and less demanding form of perimetry. This method assesses visual sensitivity based on pupil responses while performing the perhaps simplest task imaginable: watching movies.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We analyzed an existing dataset, with healthy participants (n = 70) freely watching movies with or without gaze-contingent simulated VFDs, either hemianopia (left- or right-sided) or glaucoma (large nasal arc, small nasal arc, and tunnel vision). Meanwhile, their gaze and pupil size were recorded. Using a recently published toolbox (Open-DPSM), we modeled the relative contribution of visual events to the pupil responses to indicate relative visual sensitivity across the visual field and to dissociate between conditions with and without simulated VFDs.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Conditions with and without simulated VFDs could be dissociated, with an AUC ranging from 0.85 to 0.97, depending on the specific simulated VFD condition. In addition, the dissociation was better when including more movies in the modeling but the model with as few movies as 10 movies was sufficient for a good classification (AUC ranging from 0.84 to 0.96).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Movie-viewing pupil perimetry is promising in providing complementary information for the diagnosis of VFDs, especially for those who are unable to perform conventional perimetry.</p>","PeriodicalId":12795,"journal":{"name":"Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-024-06733-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Assessing the quality of the visual field is important for the diagnosis of ophthalmic and neurological diseases and, consequently, for rehabilitation. Visual field defects (VFDs) are typically assessed using standard automated perimetry (SAP). However, SAP requires participants to understand instructions, maintain fixation and sustained attention, and provide overt responses. These aspects make SAP less suitable for very young or cognitively impaired populations. Here we investigate the feasibility of a new and less demanding form of perimetry. This method assesses visual sensitivity based on pupil responses while performing the perhaps simplest task imaginable: watching movies.

Method: We analyzed an existing dataset, with healthy participants (n = 70) freely watching movies with or without gaze-contingent simulated VFDs, either hemianopia (left- or right-sided) or glaucoma (large nasal arc, small nasal arc, and tunnel vision). Meanwhile, their gaze and pupil size were recorded. Using a recently published toolbox (Open-DPSM), we modeled the relative contribution of visual events to the pupil responses to indicate relative visual sensitivity across the visual field and to dissociate between conditions with and without simulated VFDs.

Result: Conditions with and without simulated VFDs could be dissociated, with an AUC ranging from 0.85 to 0.97, depending on the specific simulated VFD condition. In addition, the dissociation was better when including more movies in the modeling but the model with as few movies as 10 movies was sufficient for a good classification (AUC ranging from 0.84 to 0.96).

Conclusion: Movie-viewing pupil perimetry is promising in providing complementary information for the diagnosis of VFDs, especially for those who are unable to perform conventional perimetry.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用观影瞳孔视距法绘制模拟视野缺损。
目的:评估视野质量对眼科和神经系统疾病的诊断和康复具有重要意义。视野缺陷(vfd)通常使用标准的自动视距测量(SAP)来评估。然而,SAP要求参与者理解指令,保持固定和持续的注意力,并提供明显的反应。这些方面使得SAP不太适合非常年轻或认知受损的人群。在这里,我们研究了一种新的、要求较低的边界测量形式的可行性。这种方法是根据瞳孔的反应来评估视觉敏感度,而瞳孔的反应可能是最简单的任务:看电影。方法:我们分析了一个现有的数据集,健康的参与者(n = 70)自由地观看电影,有或没有注视条件的模拟vfd,包括偏视(左或右)或青光眼(大鼻弧、小鼻弧和隧道视力)。同时,他们的目光和瞳孔大小被记录下来。使用最近发布的工具箱(Open-DPSM),我们模拟了视觉事件对瞳孔反应的相对贡献,以表明整个视野的相对视觉灵敏度,并在有和没有模拟vfd的情况下分离。结果:有和没有模拟VFD的情况下均可分离,AUC范围为0.85 ~ 0.97,具体取决于模拟VFD的具体情况。此外,当模型中包含更多的电影时,分离效果更好,但只有10部电影的模型就足以实现良好的分类(AUC范围为0.84 ~ 0.96)。结论:观影瞳孔视野检查为vfd的诊断提供了补充信息,特别是对无法进行常规视野检查的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
398
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Graefe''s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology is a distinguished international journal that presents original clinical reports and clini-cally relevant experimental studies. Founded in 1854 by Albrecht von Graefe to serve as a source of useful clinical information and a stimulus for discussion, the journal has published articles by leading ophthalmologists and vision research scientists for more than a century. With peer review by an international Editorial Board and prompt English-language publication, Graefe''s Archive provides rapid dissemination of clinical and clinically related experimental information.
期刊最新文献
Reexamine the link between retinal layer thickness and cognitive function after correction of axial length: the Beijing Eye Study 2011. Comparison of the clinical outcomes after manual capsulorhexis on one eye and precision pulse capsulotomy on the other eye. Reply on comments on the paper "Descemet's membrane transplantation for the treatment of recurrent high myopic macular hole associated with retinal detachment". The rAAV2-ND1 gene therapy for Leber hereditary optic neuropathy. Adverse Events Associated with Devices for Incisional Glaucoma Surgery Performed with Implants as Reported to the FDA MAUDE Database.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1