Perianastomotic pH Monitoring for Early Detection of Anastomotic Leaks in Gastrointestinal Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Surgical Innovation Pub Date : 2025-01-07 DOI:10.1177/15533506241313168
Josephine Walshaw, Katherine Hugh, Jack Helliwell, Joshua Burke, David Jayne
{"title":"Perianastomotic pH Monitoring for Early Detection of Anastomotic Leaks in Gastrointestinal Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Literature.","authors":"Josephine Walshaw, Katherine Hugh, Jack Helliwell, Joshua Burke, David Jayne","doi":"10.1177/15533506241313168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Anastomotic leak (AL) represents a significant complication following gastrointestinal (GI) surgery, contributing to increased morbidity and mortality. pH monitoring has emerged as a potential diagnostic tool for the early detection of AL, but its effectiveness and clinical utility remain to be fully elucidated. This review aims to summarise the evidence regarding perianastomotic pH monitoring for AL detection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of relevant databases was conducted to identify pre-clinical and clinical studies investigating pH monitoring for AL detection following GI surgery. Studies were screened by two independent reviewers based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were extracted and presented as a narrative synthesis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 10 studies were included in the review, comprising animal studies (n = 2), and human studies in upper GI (n = 3) and colorectal (n = 5) patients. Consistent findings of lower pH values in patients with AL across various postoperative time points were demonstrated. There was diversity in the pH detection method, in addition to variable frequency and timing of pH monitoring. Four studies reported a shorter time for AL detection with pH monitoring vs conventional methods, although no statistical comparisons were used. No standard pH cut-off value for AL detection was identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>pH monitoring shows potential as a diagnostic tool for the early detection of AL following GI surgery. While the existing evidence supports its potential utility, further research is required to establish standardised protocols and assess its clinical impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":22095,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Innovation","volume":" ","pages":"15533506241313168"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15533506241313168","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Anastomotic leak (AL) represents a significant complication following gastrointestinal (GI) surgery, contributing to increased morbidity and mortality. pH monitoring has emerged as a potential diagnostic tool for the early detection of AL, but its effectiveness and clinical utility remain to be fully elucidated. This review aims to summarise the evidence regarding perianastomotic pH monitoring for AL detection.

Methods: A systematic search of relevant databases was conducted to identify pre-clinical and clinical studies investigating pH monitoring for AL detection following GI surgery. Studies were screened by two independent reviewers based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were extracted and presented as a narrative synthesis.

Results: A total of 10 studies were included in the review, comprising animal studies (n = 2), and human studies in upper GI (n = 3) and colorectal (n = 5) patients. Consistent findings of lower pH values in patients with AL across various postoperative time points were demonstrated. There was diversity in the pH detection method, in addition to variable frequency and timing of pH monitoring. Four studies reported a shorter time for AL detection with pH monitoring vs conventional methods, although no statistical comparisons were used. No standard pH cut-off value for AL detection was identified.

Conclusion: pH monitoring shows potential as a diagnostic tool for the early detection of AL following GI surgery. While the existing evidence supports its potential utility, further research is required to establish standardised protocols and assess its clinical impact.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
吻合口周围pH监测对胃肠道手术吻合口瘘早期发现的系统文献综述。
吻合口漏(AL)是胃肠道(GI)手术后的一个重要并发症,导致发病率和死亡率增加。pH监测已成为早期发现AL的潜在诊断工具,但其有效性和临床应用仍有待充分阐明。本综述旨在总结有关吻合口周围pH监测AL检测的证据。方法:系统检索相关数据库,以确定探讨GI手术后pH监测AL检测的临床前和临床研究。研究由两名独立的审稿人根据预先确定的纳入和排除标准进行筛选。数据被提取出来并作为叙事综合呈现。结果:本综述共纳入10项研究,包括动物研究(n = 2)、上消化道研究(n = 3)和结直肠研究(n = 5)。在不同的术后时间点,AL患者的pH值较低的结果是一致的。除了监测频率和时间不同外,pH检测方法也存在多样性。四项研究报告了与传统方法相比,pH监测AL检测时间更短,尽管没有进行统计比较。没有确定AL检测的标准pH临界值。结论:pH监测显示了作为早期发现胃肠道手术后AL的诊断工具的潜力。虽然现有证据支持其潜在效用,但需要进一步研究以建立标准化方案并评估其临床影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Surgical Innovation
Surgical Innovation 医学-外科
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Innovation (SRI) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal focusing on minimally invasive surgical techniques, new instruments such as laparoscopes and endoscopes, and new technologies. SRI prepares surgeons to think and work in "the operating room of the future" through learning new techniques, understanding and adapting to new technologies, maintaining surgical competencies, and applying surgical outcomes data to their practices. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Comparative Evaluation of Laparoscopic Origami Crane Training With 3D and 2D Laparoscopy: Correlation With Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery Scores. Virtual Colonoscopy: Retrospective Comparison of the Findings in Supine and Prone Positions. LigaSure in Breast Surgery: A Paradigm Shift With Unresolved Questions. A Novel Surgical Technique for Transsphincteric Anal Fistulas: A Comparison Between the Modified Submucosal Ligation of Fistula Tract (MSLOFT) and the Hybrid Seton Techiniques - A Propensity Score Matching Analysis. Evaluating Outcomes of Same Day Discharge After Minimally Invasive Colectomy: A Nationwide Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1