Optimizing decision-making potential, cost, and environmental impact of traps for monitoring olive fruit fly Bactrocera oleae (Rossi) (Diptera: Tephritidae).

Flora Moreno-Alcaide, Enrique Quesada-Moraga, Pablo Valverde-García, Meelad Yousef-Yousef
{"title":"Optimizing decision-making potential, cost, and environmental impact of traps for monitoring olive fruit fly Bactrocera oleae (Rossi) (Diptera: Tephritidae).","authors":"Flora Moreno-Alcaide, Enrique Quesada-Moraga, Pablo Valverde-García, Meelad Yousef-Yousef","doi":"10.1093/jee/toae296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This work aimed to optimize olive fruit fly (OFF) Bactrocera oleae (Rossi) (Diptera: Tephritidae) monitoring and integrated management, thereby ensuring optimal and less-costly decision-making and timely intervention. Field trials in Andalusia (Spain) were undertaken over 2 years to optimize trap model, color, size, and density for the accurate determination of pest spatial distribution and damage as a function of olive cultivar. McPhail traps and yellow sticky panels outperformed the other 4 models with respect to the number of OFF captured. However, McPhail traps caught more natural enemies than yellow sticky panels and so sticky panels were selected to unravel the effect of color on the number of both OFF and natural enemies [hymenopteran parasitoids (Psyttalia concolor) and lacewings (Chrysopidae)] captured. Yellow sticky panels outperformed white, green, and blue ones for the number of OFF captured and captured the fewest natural enemies. When comparing the surface area of yellow sticky panels, 20 × 25 and 10 × 25 cm double-sided panels were equally effective at catching OFF. However, large double-sided yellow sticky panels caught significantly more natural enemies than the small double-sided panels, a key result for developing a less costly and environmentally friendly monitoring system. Furthermore, it was shown that the damage curve had a cultivar-based shape, i.e., for the same population size of OFF the damage caused varied depending on cultivar. Finally, 15 sticky panels per hectare were the optimal number for estimation of OFF spatial distribution. The present research provides key information for new trap design, OFF forecasting, and IPM development.</p>","PeriodicalId":94077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of economic entomology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of economic entomology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toae296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This work aimed to optimize olive fruit fly (OFF) Bactrocera oleae (Rossi) (Diptera: Tephritidae) monitoring and integrated management, thereby ensuring optimal and less-costly decision-making and timely intervention. Field trials in Andalusia (Spain) were undertaken over 2 years to optimize trap model, color, size, and density for the accurate determination of pest spatial distribution and damage as a function of olive cultivar. McPhail traps and yellow sticky panels outperformed the other 4 models with respect to the number of OFF captured. However, McPhail traps caught more natural enemies than yellow sticky panels and so sticky panels were selected to unravel the effect of color on the number of both OFF and natural enemies [hymenopteran parasitoids (Psyttalia concolor) and lacewings (Chrysopidae)] captured. Yellow sticky panels outperformed white, green, and blue ones for the number of OFF captured and captured the fewest natural enemies. When comparing the surface area of yellow sticky panels, 20 × 25 and 10 × 25 cm double-sided panels were equally effective at catching OFF. However, large double-sided yellow sticky panels caught significantly more natural enemies than the small double-sided panels, a key result for developing a less costly and environmentally friendly monitoring system. Furthermore, it was shown that the damage curve had a cultivar-based shape, i.e., for the same population size of OFF the damage caused varied depending on cultivar. Finally, 15 sticky panels per hectare were the optimal number for estimation of OFF spatial distribution. The present research provides key information for new trap design, OFF forecasting, and IPM development.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
优化油橄榄小实蝇(双翅目:蝗科)监测陷阱的决策潜力、成本和环境影响。
本研究旨在优化橄榄果蝇(OFF)油橄榄小实蝇(Bactrocera oleae, Rossi)(双翅目:油蛾科)的监测和综合管理,从而保证决策的优化和低成本的及时干预。在西班牙安达卢西亚进行了为期2年的田间试验,以优化诱捕器的模式、颜色、大小和密度,以便准确确定害虫的空间分布和危害随橄榄品种的变化。McPhail陷阱和黄色粘性面板在捕获OFF数量方面优于其他4种模型。然而,麦克菲尔诱捕器比黄色粘板捕获的天敌更多,因此选择粘板来揭示颜色对捕获的OFF和天敌[膜翅类寄生蜂(Psyttalia concolor)和草蛉(Chrysopidae)]数量的影响。黄色粘性面板在捕获OFF数量和捕获最少天敌方面优于白色、绿色和蓝色面板。当比较黄色粘板的表面积时,20 × 25和10 × 25 cm双面板的捕获效果相同。然而,大的双面黄色粘板比小的双面板捕获的天敌明显更多,这是开发成本更低、更环保的监测系统的关键结果。结果表明,在相同种群大小的情况下,对不同品种的危害程度不同。最后,每公顷15个粘板是估算OFF空间分布的最佳数量。本研究为新的圈闭设计、OFF预测和IPM开发提供了关键信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of the biocontrol potential of Episyrphus balteatus (Diptera: Syrphidae) on wheat aphids in northern China. Laboratory and in-home evaluations of consumer- and professional-grade cockroach baits. On-farm evaluation of swede midge (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) susceptibility among popular kale varieties. Comparison of colored sticky traps for Stomoxys calcitrans (Diptera: Muscidae) on dairy cattle farms in Saraburi province, Thailand. Impact of climate change on the distribution of the citrus longhorned beetle Anoplophora chinensis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) and its host plants, Castanea mollissima and Castanea seguinii: a predictive analysis using optimized MaxEnt models.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1