Comparison of a Scheimpflug Camera and Optical Coherence Tomography in Evaluating Keratoconic Eyes Post Keratoplasty.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Clinical Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI:10.3390/jcm14010238
Anna Maria Gadamer, Piotr Miklaszewski, Dominika Janiszewska-Bil, Anita Lyssek-Boroń, Dariusz Dobrowolski, Edward Wylęgała, Beniamin Oskar Grabarek, Katarzyna Krysik
{"title":"Comparison of a Scheimpflug Camera and Optical Coherence Tomography in Evaluating Keratoconic Eyes Post Keratoplasty.","authors":"Anna Maria Gadamer, Piotr Miklaszewski, Dominika Janiszewska-Bil, Anita Lyssek-Boroń, Dariusz Dobrowolski, Edward Wylęgała, Beniamin Oskar Grabarek, Katarzyna Krysik","doi":"10.3390/jcm14010238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objective:</b> The aim of this retrospective study was to compare corneal parameters and compliance using a Pentacam HR-Scheimpflug (Pentacam HR) and a swept-source OCT Casia (Casia) in keratoconus (KC) patients post penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) and KC patients without PKP, as well as a control group. Pachymetry measurements were also analyzed using a spectral domain OCT Solix (OCT Solix), Pentacam HR, and Casia. <b>Methods:</b> The study included 71 patients (136 keratoconic eyes; group A), 86 eyes with KC post-PKP (group B), 50 eyes with KC without PKP (group C), and 52 control participants (104 eyes). All participants were adults, Polish Caucasian, and met specific inclusion criteria. Patients with ophthalmological or systemic diseases, cognitive impairment, or pregnancy were excluded. Corneal parameters were measured using two devices (Casia and Pentacam HR), while pachymetry was assessed with three devices (Casia, Pentacam HR, and OCT Solix), with the inter-device agreement and group differences analyzed. <b>Results:</b> Significant differences (<i>p</i> < 0.05) were found across all groups. The post-PKP KC eyes showed significant differences in all front parameters and K2 and Astig. back, while the non-PKP KC eyes showed differences in the K1 back (<i>p</i> = 0.025). The controls displayed differences in all parameters except front astigmatism (<i>p</i> = 0.61). The Pentacam HR overestimated the thinnest corneal thickness (TCT) compared to the OCT Casia across groups. The inter-device agreement was excellent for the anterior parameters (ICC > 0.9) but good for the posterior parameters and TCT. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study highlights significant variability in corneal and pachymetry measurements across devices, with OCT Casia providing more consistent and clinically reliable results than Pentacam HR. Clinicians should exercise caution when using these devices interchangeably, particularly for posterior parameters and TCT.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11722208/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14010238","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objective: The aim of this retrospective study was to compare corneal parameters and compliance using a Pentacam HR-Scheimpflug (Pentacam HR) and a swept-source OCT Casia (Casia) in keratoconus (KC) patients post penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) and KC patients without PKP, as well as a control group. Pachymetry measurements were also analyzed using a spectral domain OCT Solix (OCT Solix), Pentacam HR, and Casia. Methods: The study included 71 patients (136 keratoconic eyes; group A), 86 eyes with KC post-PKP (group B), 50 eyes with KC without PKP (group C), and 52 control participants (104 eyes). All participants were adults, Polish Caucasian, and met specific inclusion criteria. Patients with ophthalmological or systemic diseases, cognitive impairment, or pregnancy were excluded. Corneal parameters were measured using two devices (Casia and Pentacam HR), while pachymetry was assessed with three devices (Casia, Pentacam HR, and OCT Solix), with the inter-device agreement and group differences analyzed. Results: Significant differences (p < 0.05) were found across all groups. The post-PKP KC eyes showed significant differences in all front parameters and K2 and Astig. back, while the non-PKP KC eyes showed differences in the K1 back (p = 0.025). The controls displayed differences in all parameters except front astigmatism (p = 0.61). The Pentacam HR overestimated the thinnest corneal thickness (TCT) compared to the OCT Casia across groups. The inter-device agreement was excellent for the anterior parameters (ICC > 0.9) but good for the posterior parameters and TCT. Conclusions: This study highlights significant variability in corneal and pachymetry measurements across devices, with OCT Casia providing more consistent and clinically reliable results than Pentacam HR. Clinicians should exercise caution when using these devices interchangeably, particularly for posterior parameters and TCT.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Scheimpflug相机与光学相干断层扫描在角膜移植术后评估角膜锥形眼的比较。
背景/目的:本回顾性研究的目的是使用Pentacam HR- scheimpflug (Pentacam HR)和扫描源OCT Casia (Casia)比较圆锥角膜(KC)穿透性角膜移植术(PKP)后患者和未进行PKP的KC患者以及对照组的角膜参数和依从性。厚测测量结果也使用光谱域OCT Solix (OCT Solix)、Pentacam HR和Casia进行分析。方法:71例患者(136只眼;A组),PKP后KC 86只眼(B组),KC不伴PKP 50只眼(C组),对照组52只眼(104只眼)。所有的参与者都是成年人,波兰高加索人,并符合特定的纳入标准。排除患有眼科或全身性疾病、认知障碍或怀孕的患者。使用两种设备(Casia和Pentacam HR)测量角膜参数,而使用三种设备(Casia, Pentacam HR和OCT Solix)评估角膜测量,并分析设备间的一致性和组间差异。结果:各组间差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。pkp后KC眼各前参数及K2和Astig均有显著差异。而非pkp KC眼在K1 back上存在差异(p = 0.025)。对照组除前像散外,其他参数均有差异(p = 0.61)。与OCT相比,Pentacam HR高估了各组间最薄角膜厚度(TCT)。器械间一致性对于前路参数(ICC > 0.9)非常好,但对于后路参数和TCT很好。结论:本研究强调了不同设备间角膜和角膜测量的显著差异,与Pentacam HR相比,OCT Casia提供了更一致和临床可靠的结果。临床医生在交替使用这些装置时应谨慎,特别是对于后验参数和TCT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
期刊最新文献
Sex-Based Differences in Management and Outcomes of Patients Admitted or Transferred to Advanced Therapy Centers for Heart Failure. Psychosocial Determinants Among Hospital and Primary Healthcare Professionals Towards Cancer and Cancer Patients in Croatia. Disease Activity Trajectories During Pregnancy Predict Medically Indicated Complications in Women with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Bevacizumab-Based Therapy Is Associated with Prolonged Progression-Free Survival in Patients with Peritoneal Mucinous Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Beyond Glycemic Control: GLP-1RA-Based Therapies and Emerging Targets Beyond the Metabolic Axis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1