Fluid Intake and Hydration Responses to Mass Participation Gravel Cycling.

Q1 Health Professions International journal of exercise science Pub Date : 2024-12-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.70252/IWVS1647
Carly Schuerger, Brandon Raik, Francis Salmon, Kian Foote, Angelo Madlambayan, Maya Vega, Grace Handler, Matthew M Schubert
{"title":"Fluid Intake and Hydration Responses to Mass Participation Gravel Cycling.","authors":"Carly Schuerger, Brandon Raik, Francis Salmon, Kian Foote, Angelo Madlambayan, Maya Vega, Grace Handler, Matthew M Schubert","doi":"10.70252/IWVS1647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gravel cycling is a relatively new cycling discipline, with the Union Cycliste Internationale (UCI) hosting their first World Championships in 2022. Gravel races combine features of road racing, cyclocross, and mountain biking, including terrain of varying technical difficulty, long distances, substantial elevation gain, obstacles, and limited opportunities to stop for in-race nutrition. This study assessed hydration responses to gravel races of three different distances. Data were collected on saliva osmolarity (SOsm), body mass (BM), fluid intake, and nutrition knowledge at a gravel cycling race in April 2023. A total of 121 participants completed pre-race surveys, 53 provided pre-race measures of BM and SOsm, and 38 participants completed post-race testing. Only 22.6% (n = 12) of participants were hydrated before the race, with 56.6% mildly dehydrated (n = 30), 18.9% moderately dehydrated (n = 10), and 1.9% severely dehydrated (n = 1). Post-race, 15% (n=6) were still hydrated, 20% (n = 8) were mildly dehydrated, 47.5% (n = 19) were moderately dehydrated, and 17.5% (n = 7) were severely dehydrated. Analyses revealed significant decreases in BM and increases in SOsm from pre- to post-exercise in the two longer race distances (p < 0.05). There was a significant effect of race distance on energy, fluid, carbohydrate, and sodium intake (p < 0.05). Sweat rates were not different (p > 0.05). Our results revealed an effect of race distance on BM losses, SOsm, and energy, fluid, carbohydrate, and sodium intakes. Future studies could inform optimal feeding and hydration strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":14171,"journal":{"name":"International journal of exercise science","volume":"17 2","pages":"1648-1662"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11728578/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of exercise science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.70252/IWVS1647","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gravel cycling is a relatively new cycling discipline, with the Union Cycliste Internationale (UCI) hosting their first World Championships in 2022. Gravel races combine features of road racing, cyclocross, and mountain biking, including terrain of varying technical difficulty, long distances, substantial elevation gain, obstacles, and limited opportunities to stop for in-race nutrition. This study assessed hydration responses to gravel races of three different distances. Data were collected on saliva osmolarity (SOsm), body mass (BM), fluid intake, and nutrition knowledge at a gravel cycling race in April 2023. A total of 121 participants completed pre-race surveys, 53 provided pre-race measures of BM and SOsm, and 38 participants completed post-race testing. Only 22.6% (n = 12) of participants were hydrated before the race, with 56.6% mildly dehydrated (n = 30), 18.9% moderately dehydrated (n = 10), and 1.9% severely dehydrated (n = 1). Post-race, 15% (n=6) were still hydrated, 20% (n = 8) were mildly dehydrated, 47.5% (n = 19) were moderately dehydrated, and 17.5% (n = 7) were severely dehydrated. Analyses revealed significant decreases in BM and increases in SOsm from pre- to post-exercise in the two longer race distances (p < 0.05). There was a significant effect of race distance on energy, fluid, carbohydrate, and sodium intake (p < 0.05). Sweat rates were not different (p > 0.05). Our results revealed an effect of race distance on BM losses, SOsm, and energy, fluid, carbohydrate, and sodium intakes. Future studies could inform optimal feeding and hydration strategies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大量参与砾石自行车运动的液体摄入和水化反应。
砾石自行车是一项相对较新的自行车运动,国际自行车联盟(UCI)将于2022年举办首届世界锦标赛。砾石赛结合了公路赛、自行车赛和山地自行车的特点,包括不同技术难度的地形、长距离、大幅度的海拔上升、障碍和有限的比赛中停下来补充营养的机会。本研究评估了三种不同距离砾石的水化反应。收集了2023年4月一场砂砾自行车赛的唾液渗透压(SOsm)、体重(BM)、液体摄入量和营养知识等数据。121名参与者完成了赛前调查,53名参与者提供了赛前BM和SOsm测量,38名参与者完成了赛后测试。赛前只有22.6% (n= 12)的人缺水,其中轻度脱水(n= 30)占56.6%,中度脱水(n= 10)占18.9%,严重脱水(n= 1)占1.9%。比赛后,15% (n=6)的人仍然缺水,20% (n= 8)的人轻度脱水,47.5% (n= 19)的人中度脱水,17.5% (n= 7)的人严重脱水。分析显示,在两个较长距离的比赛中,从运动前到运动后,BM显著降低,SOsm显著增加(p < 0.05)。赛跑距离对能量、液体、碳水化合物和钠摄入量有显著影响(p < 0.05)。排汗率差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。我们的研究结果揭示了赛跑距离对BM损失、SOsm以及能量、液体、碳水化合物和钠摄入量的影响。未来的研究可以为最佳喂养和补水策略提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of exercise science
International journal of exercise science Health Professions-Occupational Therapy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of Exercise Dependence Among High-Intensity Functional Training Practitioners: A Cross-Sectional Analysis. The Psychometric Performance of State Mindfulness Scales Around Sitting and Walking on Desert Trails: A Pilot Study. Yoga vs. Static Stretching: Recovery Impact on Male Athletes' Post-HIIT Heart Rate, Respiratory Rate, Blood Pressure, and Heart Rate Variability Analysis. Longitudinal Analysis of Subsequent Musculoskeletal Injuries and Predictive Value of Index Injuries in Collegiate Women's Field Hockey. Observing the Relationship Between Additional Measures of Handgrip Strength and the 6-Minute Push Test in Ambulatory Young Adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1