RETRACTION: Comparison of the Postoperative Analgesic Effects of Paracetamol-Codeine Phosphate and Naproxen Sodium-Codeine Phosphate for Lumbar Disk Surgery.
{"title":"RETRACTION: Comparison of the Postoperative Analgesic Effects of Paracetamol-Codeine Phosphate and Naproxen Sodium-Codeine Phosphate for Lumbar Disk Surgery.","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/kjm2.12945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Retraction: R. Polat , K. Peker , Ç. T. Gülöksüz , J. Ergil , T. Akkaya , \"Comparison of the Postoperative Analgesic Effects of Paracetamol-Codeine Phosphate and Naproxen Sodium-Codeine Phosphate for Lumbar Disk Surgery,\" Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences 31, no. 9 (2015): 468-472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjms.2015.07.001. The above article, published online on 06 August 2015, in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com), and has been retracted by agreement between the journal Editor-in-Chief, Wan-Long Chuang; Kaohsiung Medical University; and John Wiley and Sons Australia, Ltd. In 2021, a third party raised concerns regarding evidence of unlikely similarity in the standard deviation values presented in Figures 1 and 2. The journal contacted the authors, who provided original data for evaluation by the journal. Following further correspondence, the journal and publisher concluded that the authors' response satisfied their concerns and that the investigation should be closed without further action. In 2024, the complainant appealed to the journal and publisher to re-open the investigation based on the substantial evidence of errors. The publisher accepted this appeal and re-opened the investigation. The editors have conducted a review of the evidence and the provided dataset and found that the data includes substantial numbers of duplicated values across pairs of patients. The editors have determined that the substantial quantity of duplicated values is incompatible with a genuine randomized controlled trial and that the evidence compromises the conclusions of the article. As such, the parties agree that a retraction is necessary. The authors disagree with the retraction.</p>","PeriodicalId":94244,"journal":{"name":"The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences","volume":" ","pages":"e12945"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/kjm2.12945","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Retraction: R. Polat , K. Peker , Ç. T. Gülöksüz , J. Ergil , T. Akkaya , "Comparison of the Postoperative Analgesic Effects of Paracetamol-Codeine Phosphate and Naproxen Sodium-Codeine Phosphate for Lumbar Disk Surgery," Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences 31, no. 9 (2015): 468-472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjms.2015.07.001. The above article, published online on 06 August 2015, in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com), and has been retracted by agreement between the journal Editor-in-Chief, Wan-Long Chuang; Kaohsiung Medical University; and John Wiley and Sons Australia, Ltd. In 2021, a third party raised concerns regarding evidence of unlikely similarity in the standard deviation values presented in Figures 1 and 2. The journal contacted the authors, who provided original data for evaluation by the journal. Following further correspondence, the journal and publisher concluded that the authors' response satisfied their concerns and that the investigation should be closed without further action. In 2024, the complainant appealed to the journal and publisher to re-open the investigation based on the substantial evidence of errors. The publisher accepted this appeal and re-opened the investigation. The editors have conducted a review of the evidence and the provided dataset and found that the data includes substantial numbers of duplicated values across pairs of patients. The editors have determined that the substantial quantity of duplicated values is incompatible with a genuine randomized controlled trial and that the evidence compromises the conclusions of the article. As such, the parties agree that a retraction is necessary. The authors disagree with the retraction.
撤回:R. Polat, K. Peker, Ç。T. Gülöksüz, J. Ergil, T. Akkaya,“对乙酰氨基酚-磷酸可待因与萘普生钠-磷酸可待因在腰椎间盘手术后镇痛效果之比较”,高雄医学杂志,第31期,no。9(2015): 468-472。https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjms.2015.07.001。上述文章于2015年8月6日在Wiley在线图书馆(wileyonlinelibrary.com)上发表,经主编张万龙同意撤回;高雄医科大学;及约翰威利父子澳洲有限公司2021年,第三方对图1和图2中所示的标准差值不太可能相似的证据提出了担忧。期刊联系了作者,作者提供了原始数据供期刊评估。在进一步的通信之后,期刊和出版商得出结论,作者的回复满足了他们的担忧,调查应该结束,不采取进一步行动。2024年,原告向该期刊和出版商提出上诉,要求基于错误的实质性证据重新展开调查。出版商接受了上诉,重新展开了调查。编辑们对证据和提供的数据集进行了审查,发现这些数据包括大量患者对之间的重复值。编辑们已经确定,大量的重复值与真正的随机对照试验不相容,证据损害了文章的结论。因此,双方一致认为撤销声明是必要的。作者不同意撤稿。