Comparative analysis of axial length measurement method for eyes with submacular hemorrhage.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI:10.1007/s10384-024-01147-2
Masakazu Nagayama, Shuhei Kimura, Mio Morizane Hosokawa, Yusuke Shiode, Ryo Matoba, Tetsuro Morita, Keisuke Kanenaga, Yuki Morizane
{"title":"Comparative analysis of axial length measurement method for eyes with submacular hemorrhage.","authors":"Masakazu Nagayama, Shuhei Kimura, Mio Morizane Hosokawa, Yusuke Shiode, Ryo Matoba, Tetsuro Morita, Keisuke Kanenaga, Yuki Morizane","doi":"10.1007/s10384-024-01147-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify a method for comparing preoperative axial length (AL) measurements with postoperative AL in submacular hemorrhage (SMH).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 30 patients who underwent vitrectomy for SMH (January 2016-January 2023) with preoperative and postoperative AL data. Preoperative AL was obtained using ultrasonography for the affected eye (aUS-AL) and compared to those measured using optical biometry (OB) for the affected and fellow eyes (aOB-AL and fOB-AL, respectively). Postoperative AL (aPost-AL) was defined as the AL of the affected eye by OB. The absolute differences between the preoperative AL (aUS-AL, aOB-AL, and fOB-AL) and aPost-AL were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>aUS-AL, aOB-AL, and fOB-AL values were 23.50 ± 1.41 mm, 23.32 ± 1.40 mm, and 23.66 ± 1.45 mm, respectively, correlating strongly with aPost-AL (23.54 ± 1.37 mm) (all R > 0.95). fOB-AL exceeded aPost-AL significantly (P = 0.02). In all 30 eyes, absolute differences between preoperative AL and aPost-AL were 0.19 ± 0.18 mm, 0.28 ± 0.32 mm, and 0.21 ± 0.22 mm, respectively, which were not significantly different from each other (all P > 0.05). In nine eyes with SMH height > 1000 μm or unmeasurable, the absolute difference between aOB-AL and aPost-AL (0.42 ± 0.33 mm) exceeded that of aUS-AL and aPost-AL (0.10 ± 0.09 mm) (P = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although aUS-AL, aOB-AL, and fOB-AL correlated well with postoperative AL in patients with SMH, fOB-AL may be measured longer and aOB-AL shorter in some cases. Therefore, aUS-AL may be considered primarily in determining IOL power of cataract surgery performed in combination with SMH displacement.</p>","PeriodicalId":14563,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-024-01147-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To identify a method for comparing preoperative axial length (AL) measurements with postoperative AL in submacular hemorrhage (SMH).

Study design: Retrospective.

Methods: This study included 30 patients who underwent vitrectomy for SMH (January 2016-January 2023) with preoperative and postoperative AL data. Preoperative AL was obtained using ultrasonography for the affected eye (aUS-AL) and compared to those measured using optical biometry (OB) for the affected and fellow eyes (aOB-AL and fOB-AL, respectively). Postoperative AL (aPost-AL) was defined as the AL of the affected eye by OB. The absolute differences between the preoperative AL (aUS-AL, aOB-AL, and fOB-AL) and aPost-AL were assessed.

Results: aUS-AL, aOB-AL, and fOB-AL values were 23.50 ± 1.41 mm, 23.32 ± 1.40 mm, and 23.66 ± 1.45 mm, respectively, correlating strongly with aPost-AL (23.54 ± 1.37 mm) (all R > 0.95). fOB-AL exceeded aPost-AL significantly (P = 0.02). In all 30 eyes, absolute differences between preoperative AL and aPost-AL were 0.19 ± 0.18 mm, 0.28 ± 0.32 mm, and 0.21 ± 0.22 mm, respectively, which were not significantly different from each other (all P > 0.05). In nine eyes with SMH height > 1000 μm or unmeasurable, the absolute difference between aOB-AL and aPost-AL (0.42 ± 0.33 mm) exceeded that of aUS-AL and aPost-AL (0.10 ± 0.09 mm) (P = 0.003).

Conclusion: Although aUS-AL, aOB-AL, and fOB-AL correlated well with postoperative AL in patients with SMH, fOB-AL may be measured longer and aOB-AL shorter in some cases. Therefore, aUS-AL may be considered primarily in determining IOL power of cataract surgery performed in combination with SMH displacement.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
黄斑下出血眼轴长测量方法的比较分析。
目的:确定一种比较黄斑下出血(SMH)术前轴长(AL)测量与术后AL测量的方法。研究设计:回顾性。方法:本研究纳入了30例(2016年1月- 2023年1月)接受玻璃体切除术治疗SMH的患者,并提供了术前和术后AL数据。术前使用超声检查获得受累眼的AL (au -AL),并与使用光学生物测定法(OB)测量受累眼和其他眼的AL(分别为aOB-AL和fOB-AL)进行比较。术后AL (aPost-AL)定义为受OB影响眼的AL。评估术前AL (aUS-AL、aOB-AL和fOB-AL)与aPost-AL的绝对差异。结果:au - al、aOB-AL、fOB-AL分别为23.50±1.41 mm、23.32±1.40 mm、23.66±1.45 mm,与aPost-AL相关性较强(23.54±1.37 mm) (R均为0.95)。fOB-AL显著高于post - al (P = 0.02)。30只眼术前AL与术后AL的绝对差值分别为0.19±0.18 mm、0.28±0.32 mm、0.21±0.22 mm,差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。在9只SMH高度为bbb1000 μm或无法测量的眼中,aOB-AL与aPost-AL的绝对差值(0.42±0.33 mm)大于aUS-AL与aPost-AL的绝对差值(0.10±0.09 mm) (P = 0.003)。结论:虽然aUS-AL、aOB-AL和fOB-AL与SMH患者术后AL相关性良好,但在某些情况下,fOB-AL测量时间可能更长,aOB-AL测量时间可能更短。因此,在确定合并SMH移位的白内障手术的IOL度数时,可能主要考虑us - al。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
65
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology (JJO) was inaugurated in 1957 as a quarterly journal published in English by the Ophthalmology Department of the University of Tokyo, with the aim of disseminating the achievements of Japanese ophthalmologists worldwide. JJO remains the only Japanese ophthalmology journal published in English. In 1997, the Japanese Ophthalmological Society assumed the responsibility for publishing the Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology as its official English-language publication. Currently the journal is published bimonthly and accepts papers from authors worldwide. JJO has become an international interdisciplinary forum for the publication of basic science and clinical research papers.
期刊最新文献
Classification of fundus autofluorescence images based on macular function in retinitis pigmentosa using convolutional neural networks. HTRA1 and complement activation in neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Temporal changes in parameters associated with tear film stability after instillation of long-acting diquafosol ophthalmic solution in soft contact lens wearers. Safety and aesthetic outcomes of silicone buckles as an implant for anophthalmic sockets: a decade of experience in Japan. Reliability and validity of pre- and post-operative health-related quality of life in strabismus patients using the Japanese version of the adult strabismus questionnaire (AS-20).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1