Three-dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Implant Prosthesis After Mandibular Reconstruction by Upper Distal Free Double-Barrel Fibula.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Journal of Craniofacial Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-15 DOI:10.1097/SCS.0000000000011068
Ming Su, Shifeng Wu, Haibin Sun, Yang Yang, Ning Xu, Zhengxue Han
{"title":"Three-dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Implant Prosthesis After Mandibular Reconstruction by Upper Distal Free Double-Barrel Fibula.","authors":"Ming Su, Shifeng Wu, Haibin Sun, Yang Yang, Ning Xu, Zhengxue Han","doi":"10.1097/SCS.0000000000011068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to compare the biomechanics of implant prostheses and peri-implant bone among 6 different mandibular reconstruction models based on patient data involving the use of an upper free-end double-barrel fibula.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was an observational study. Five models were reconstructed using fibular-supported and implant-supported partial dentures. Two of these models were double-barrel fibula models with different gaps between the upper and lower segments. The other 2 were single-layered fibular models (the fibula was placed at the inferior or superior mandibular borders). The fifth model was a double-barrel fibula with a free distal end on the upper segment. In addition, a typical mandibular model was created for comparison. Two fixed partial-denture models were used in this study. The von Mises stress and strain of the models were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The maximum stress decreased with increasing gap between the upper and lower fibula. The distal free-end double-barrel fibula showed a potential to reduce the maximum stress around the implant apex while increasing it around the implant neck compared with a fixed distal-end double-barrel fibula.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Utilizing a free distal end on the upper fibula may be a viable option for mandibular reconstruction, especially when the fibula length is limited.</p>","PeriodicalId":15462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000011068","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to compare the biomechanics of implant prostheses and peri-implant bone among 6 different mandibular reconstruction models based on patient data involving the use of an upper free-end double-barrel fibula.

Methods: This study was an observational study. Five models were reconstructed using fibular-supported and implant-supported partial dentures. Two of these models were double-barrel fibula models with different gaps between the upper and lower segments. The other 2 were single-layered fibular models (the fibula was placed at the inferior or superior mandibular borders). The fifth model was a double-barrel fibula with a free distal end on the upper segment. In addition, a typical mandibular model was created for comparison. Two fixed partial-denture models were used in this study. The von Mises stress and strain of the models were analyzed.

Results: The maximum stress decreased with increasing gap between the upper and lower fibula. The distal free-end double-barrel fibula showed a potential to reduce the maximum stress around the implant apex while increasing it around the implant neck compared with a fixed distal-end double-barrel fibula.

Conclusions: Utilizing a free distal end on the upper fibula may be a viable option for mandibular reconstruction, especially when the fibula length is limited.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
上远端游离双管腓骨重建下颌骨后种植体的三维有限元分析。
目的:本研究旨在比较6种不同的下颌重建模型中种植体和种植体周围骨的生物力学性能,该模型基于使用上端游离双管腓骨的患者数据。方法:本研究为观察性研究。采用腓骨支义齿和种植支义齿重建5个模型。其中2个模型为上下节段间隙不同的双管腓骨模型。另外2例为单层腓骨模型(腓骨放置于下颌骨下缘或上缘)。第五种模型为双管腓骨,上节段远端游离。此外,还制作了一个典型的下颌模型进行比较。本研究采用两种固定局部义齿模型。对模型的von Mises应力和应变进行了分析。结果:最大应力随上下腓骨间隙的增大而减小。与固定远端双管腓骨相比,远端自由双管腓骨显示出降低种植体尖端周围最大应力的潜力,同时增加种植体颈部周围的最大应力。结论:在上腓骨上使用游离远端可能是下颌骨重建的可行选择,特别是当腓骨长度有限时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
968
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery serves as a forum of communication for all those involved in craniofacial surgery, maxillofacial surgery and pediatric plastic surgery. Coverage ranges from practical aspects of craniofacial surgery to the basic science that underlies surgical practice. The journal publishes original articles, scientific reviews, editorials and invited commentary, abstracts and selected articles from international journals, and occasional international bibliographies in craniofacial surgery.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Lower Lip Hypoesthesia Using Trigeminal Somatosensory Evoked Potential After Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy: Retrospective Study. Sap Anthropometric Landmark: A Morphometric Orientation Point of the Nasal Tip. The Evaluation of the Pterygomaxillary Separation Pattern in Le Fort I Osteotomy Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Comparison the Cosmetic Outcome of the Triangular Flap Insertion Versus Direct Linear Resection in Correction of Dog Ear Deformities on the Face-A Prospective and Randomized Controlled Trial. The Use of Coronoid Process as a Free Graft for Condylar Reconstruction in a Patient With Condylar Osteoma: A Condylar Reconstruction Technical Note (Technical Strategy).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1