Supervision, performance assessment, and recognition strategy (SPARS) - a multipronged strategy to strengthen medicines management in Nepal: pilot study methods and baseline results.

IF 3.3 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2025-01-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20523211.2024.2449043
Nirajan Bhusal, Anup Bastola, Reekesh Shrestha, Narendra Kumar Khanal, Birna Trap
{"title":"Supervision, performance assessment, and recognition strategy (SPARS) - a multipronged strategy to strengthen medicines management in Nepal: pilot study methods and baseline results.","authors":"Nirajan Bhusal, Anup Bastola, Reekesh Shrestha, Narendra Kumar Khanal, Birna Trap","doi":"10.1080/20523211.2024.2449043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nepal piloted a multipronged supervision, performance assessment, and recognition strategy (SPARS), to improve medicines management (MM) in public health facilities. This paper describes the SPARS pilot intervention and reports on MM performance at baseline.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To build MM capacity at public sector health facilities, health workers were trained as MM supervisors to visit and supervise government health facilities, assess MM performance, and use the findings to provide support in MM practices. Performance was assessed using a SPARS indicator-based tool containing 25 indicators covering five MM domains: dispensing quality, prescribing quality, stock management, storage management, and ordering and reporting. From the middle of 2022, we trained 60 MM supervisors who began conducting supervisory visits at 284 health facilities in 12 randomly selected pilot districts located in three provinces. The intent, pending funding, is to continue supervision and expand SPARS to achieve national coverage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall MM baseline median score was 8.5 (34%) (maximum 25) with an inter-quartile range (IQR) of 6.4-10.7. Median facility domain scores (maximum 5) were: storage management, 2.0 (IQR 1.4-2.6); stock management 0.3 (IQR 0.0-1.0); ordering and reporting 2.5 (IQR 1.7-3.5); dispensing quality 1.3 (IQR 0.9-1.6); and prescribing quality 2.3 (IQR 1.3-3.3). The overall score did not differ significantly by level of care; however, hospitals had the lowest overall baseline score and individual domain scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The baseline assessment using the SPARS tool provides valuable information on the current state of MM in Nepal, which was poor, assessed by the 25 SPARS indicators covering stock and storage management, ordering and reporting, prescribing, and dispensing. Assessing and building national capacity in MM is needed at health facilities at all levels of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":16740,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","volume":"18 1","pages":"2449043"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11749287/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20523211.2024.2449043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Nepal piloted a multipronged supervision, performance assessment, and recognition strategy (SPARS), to improve medicines management (MM) in public health facilities. This paper describes the SPARS pilot intervention and reports on MM performance at baseline.

Methods: To build MM capacity at public sector health facilities, health workers were trained as MM supervisors to visit and supervise government health facilities, assess MM performance, and use the findings to provide support in MM practices. Performance was assessed using a SPARS indicator-based tool containing 25 indicators covering five MM domains: dispensing quality, prescribing quality, stock management, storage management, and ordering and reporting. From the middle of 2022, we trained 60 MM supervisors who began conducting supervisory visits at 284 health facilities in 12 randomly selected pilot districts located in three provinces. The intent, pending funding, is to continue supervision and expand SPARS to achieve national coverage.

Results: The overall MM baseline median score was 8.5 (34%) (maximum 25) with an inter-quartile range (IQR) of 6.4-10.7. Median facility domain scores (maximum 5) were: storage management, 2.0 (IQR 1.4-2.6); stock management 0.3 (IQR 0.0-1.0); ordering and reporting 2.5 (IQR 1.7-3.5); dispensing quality 1.3 (IQR 0.9-1.6); and prescribing quality 2.3 (IQR 1.3-3.3). The overall score did not differ significantly by level of care; however, hospitals had the lowest overall baseline score and individual domain scores.

Conclusion: The baseline assessment using the SPARS tool provides valuable information on the current state of MM in Nepal, which was poor, assessed by the 25 SPARS indicators covering stock and storage management, ordering and reporting, prescribing, and dispensing. Assessing and building national capacity in MM is needed at health facilities at all levels of care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
监督、绩效评估和认可战略(SPARS)——加强尼泊尔药品管理的多管齐下战略:试点研究方法和基线结果
背景:尼泊尔试点了一项多管齐下的监督、绩效评估和识别战略(SPARS),以改善公共卫生设施的药品管理。本文描述了SPARS试点干预措施,并报告了基线时MM的性能。方法:为了在公共卫生机构建立MM能力,卫生工作者被培训为MM监督员,以访问和监督政府卫生机构,评估MM绩效,并利用调查结果为MM实践提供支持。使用基于SPARS指标的工具评估绩效,该工具包含25个指标,涵盖5个MM领域:配药质量、处方质量、库存管理、存储管理以及订购和报告。从2022年年中开始,我们培训了60名MM监督员,他们开始在3个省随机选择的12个试验区的284家卫生机构进行监督访问。在获得资金之前,其目的是继续监督和扩大SPARS以实现全国覆盖。结果:总体MM基线中位评分为8.5(34%)(最大25),四分位数范围(IQR)为6.4-10.7。设施领域得分中位数(最大5分)为:存储管理,2.0分(IQR 1.4-2.6);库存管理0.3 (IQR为0.0-1.0);订购和报告2.5 (IQR 1.7-3.5);配药质量1.3 (IQR 0.9-1.6);处方质量2.3 (IQR 1.3-3.3)。总体得分在护理水平上没有显著差异;然而,医院的总体基线得分和个别领域得分最低。结论:使用SPARS工具的基线评估提供了关于尼泊尔MM现状的有价值的信息,通过25个SPARS指标评估,包括库存和储存管理、订购和报告、处方和分发。评估和建设各级保健机构在MM方面的国家能力是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
81
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Abuse and misuse of tramadol in patients with non-oncologic pain in a region of Southern Europe. Effectiveness of a pharmacist-led tele-psychiatric clinic in managing drug-related problems. Pharmacist prescriber in Italy and possible changes to current legislation: survey of attitudes among pharmacists, family doctors and users. Medication-focused telehealth interventions to reduce the hospital readmission rate: a systematic review. The prevalence of thromboembolic events among COVID-19 patients admitted to a single centre intensive care unit (ICU): an epidemiological study from a Malaysian population.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1