The effect of maternal and fetal weight on the risk of emergency cesarean section in nulliparous women.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-17 DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000041095
Jing Bao, Ping Guan
{"title":"The effect of maternal and fetal weight on the risk of emergency cesarean section in nulliparous women.","authors":"Jing Bao, Ping Guan","doi":"10.1097/MD.0000000000041095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although many studies based on different ethnic groups have analyzed the impact of maternal and infant weight on overall cesarean section rates in recent years, research on the impact of maternal and infant weight on emergency cesarean section (EmCS) rates is lacking, especially in the Chinese population. This study aimed to analyze whether maternal and fetal weight could influence the risk of EmCS. A total of 8427 nulliparous women who delivered vaginally (full-term, singleton, and cephalic presentation) were included in this study and divided into the normal vaginal delivery (VD) and EmCS groups. Of 8427 cases, 909 (10.8%) were delivered by EmCS because of failed VD. Compared with pregnant women with a normal body mass index, the risk of EmCS in overweight women increased significantly (P < .001). Birth weight > 3550 g was associated with an increased risk of EmCS. Subgroup analyses showed that among women with underweight and normal weight, old age, inadequate gestational weight gain, and large for gestational age were independent high-risk factors for EmCS (P < .05), whereas small for gestational age was the low-risk factor. Compared with the fetal distress group, the weight of newborns in the nonfetal distress group was significantly higher (P < .001), and the main cause of EmCS in women with macrosomia, large for gestational age, or birth weight ≥ 3550 g was fetal distress (P < .05). The prepregnancy maternal and fetal weights can affect the risk of EmCS. Weight management should be enhanced to control gestational weight gain according to the prepregnancy body mass index to reduce the risk of EmCS due to failed VD.</p>","PeriodicalId":18549,"journal":{"name":"Medicine","volume":"104 3","pages":"e41095"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11749654/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000041095","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although many studies based on different ethnic groups have analyzed the impact of maternal and infant weight on overall cesarean section rates in recent years, research on the impact of maternal and infant weight on emergency cesarean section (EmCS) rates is lacking, especially in the Chinese population. This study aimed to analyze whether maternal and fetal weight could influence the risk of EmCS. A total of 8427 nulliparous women who delivered vaginally (full-term, singleton, and cephalic presentation) were included in this study and divided into the normal vaginal delivery (VD) and EmCS groups. Of 8427 cases, 909 (10.8%) were delivered by EmCS because of failed VD. Compared with pregnant women with a normal body mass index, the risk of EmCS in overweight women increased significantly (P < .001). Birth weight > 3550 g was associated with an increased risk of EmCS. Subgroup analyses showed that among women with underweight and normal weight, old age, inadequate gestational weight gain, and large for gestational age were independent high-risk factors for EmCS (P < .05), whereas small for gestational age was the low-risk factor. Compared with the fetal distress group, the weight of newborns in the nonfetal distress group was significantly higher (P < .001), and the main cause of EmCS in women with macrosomia, large for gestational age, or birth weight ≥ 3550 g was fetal distress (P < .05). The prepregnancy maternal and fetal weights can affect the risk of EmCS. Weight management should be enhanced to control gestational weight gain according to the prepregnancy body mass index to reduce the risk of EmCS due to failed VD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
产妇和胎儿体重对无产妇女紧急剖宫产风险的影响。
近年来,虽然有许多基于不同民族的研究分析了母婴体重对剖宫产率的影响,但缺乏关于母婴体重对急诊剖宫产率影响的研究,特别是在中国人群中。本研究旨在分析母体和胎儿体重是否会影响EmCS的发生风险。本研究共纳入8427例经阴道分娩(足月、单胎和头位分娩)的无产妇女,并将其分为正常阴道分娩组(VD)和EmCS组。8427例患者中,909例(10.8%)因VD失败采用EmCS分娩。与体重指数正常的孕妇相比,超重妇女发生EmCS的风险显著增加(p3550 g与EmCS风险增加相关)。亚组分析显示,在体重不足和正常体重的妇女中,年龄大、妊娠期体重增加不足和胎龄大是EmCS的独立高危因素(P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medicine
Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4342
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medicine is now a fully open access journal, providing authors with a distinctive new service offering continuous publication of original research across a broad spectrum of medical scientific disciplines and sub-specialties. As an open access title, Medicine will continue to provide authors with an established, trusted platform for the publication of their work. To ensure the ongoing quality of Medicine’s content, the peer-review process will only accept content that is scientifically, technically and ethically sound, and in compliance with standard reporting guidelines.
期刊最新文献
Mendelian randomization analysis of female reproductive factors on osteoarthritis. Meta-analysis on the primary approach: Aspiration versus stent retrieval for internal carotid artery occlusion. Multicentric primary ectopic meningiomas involving lung and cranial bone barrier: A rare case report. Identification of DNA damage repair-related genes in sepsis using bioinformatics and machine learning: An observational study. Identification of potential biomarkers associated with cuproptosis and immune microenvironment analysis in acute myocardial infarction: A diagnostic accuracy study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1