Ultra-short-term versus short-term measures of heart rate variability in specialist police units: A pilot reliability study.

IF 2.2 Q3 PHYSIOLOGY Physiological Reports Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.14814/phy2.70182
Colin D Tomes, Elisa F D Canetti, Ben Schram, Robin Orr
{"title":"Ultra-short-term versus short-term measures of heart rate variability in specialist police units: A pilot reliability study.","authors":"Colin D Tomes, Elisa F D Canetti, Ben Schram, Robin Orr","doi":"10.14814/phy2.70182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Police officers are exposed to high levels of stress. Serving on Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) teams is a highly demanding duty that may further increase levels of stress in police personnel. This stress may accumulate, thereby increasing allostatic load. As such, holistic stress measures may be valuable for quantifying multifactorial stress accumulation in SWAT personnel. Heart rate variability (HRV) is one field-deployable measure that may be suitable in this context. However, with logistical challenges present in this population, determining if 30 s; rather than more the typical 5-min ECG data collection, provides sufficient reliability may be beneficial for reducing the logistical barrier to adoption of HRV monitoring in SWAT personnel. This study compared 30-s to 5-min HRV analyses of ECG data obtained from 15 male SWAT personnel. Findings demonstrated good (ICC >0.8) reliability only in the VLF, HF, SD1, and SD2 HRV domains. The VLF and SD2 measures may be erroneous, as 5-min may still insufficiently characterize these measures. However, this study confirms the robust quality of nonlinear HRV analysis, as the SD1 value demonstrated the highest ICC reported here (0.902). Therefore, while 5-min ECGs may still preferable, the 30-s measure may still be viable for organizations considering HRV assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":20083,"journal":{"name":"Physiological Reports","volume":"13 2","pages":"e70182"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11738644/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiological Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.70182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Police officers are exposed to high levels of stress. Serving on Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) teams is a highly demanding duty that may further increase levels of stress in police personnel. This stress may accumulate, thereby increasing allostatic load. As such, holistic stress measures may be valuable for quantifying multifactorial stress accumulation in SWAT personnel. Heart rate variability (HRV) is one field-deployable measure that may be suitable in this context. However, with logistical challenges present in this population, determining if 30 s; rather than more the typical 5-min ECG data collection, provides sufficient reliability may be beneficial for reducing the logistical barrier to adoption of HRV monitoring in SWAT personnel. This study compared 30-s to 5-min HRV analyses of ECG data obtained from 15 male SWAT personnel. Findings demonstrated good (ICC >0.8) reliability only in the VLF, HF, SD1, and SD2 HRV domains. The VLF and SD2 measures may be erroneous, as 5-min may still insufficiently characterize these measures. However, this study confirms the robust quality of nonlinear HRV analysis, as the SD1 value demonstrated the highest ICC reported here (0.902). Therefore, while 5-min ECGs may still preferable, the 30-s measure may still be viable for organizations considering HRV assessment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
专业警察单位的超短期与短期心率变异性测量:一项试点可靠性研究。
警察承受着巨大的压力。在特种武器和战术(SWAT)小组服役是一项要求很高的任务,可能会进一步增加警察人员的压力水平。这种应力可能累积,从而增加适应负荷。因此,整体应力测量对于量化SWAT人员的多因素应力积累可能是有价值的。心率变异性(HRV)是一种现场可部署的测量方法,可能适用于这种情况。然而,由于这一人口中存在后勤挑战,决定是否30岁;而不是更多的典型的5分钟心电图数据收集,提供足够的可靠性可能有利于减少后勤障碍,采用特警人员的心率波动监测。本研究比较了15名男性SWAT人员30-s至5分钟的心电图数据HRV分析。研究结果显示,只有在VLF、HF、SD1和SD2 HRV域具有良好的可靠性(ICC >0.8)。VLF和SD2测量可能是错误的,因为5分钟可能仍然不能充分表征这些测量。然而,本研究证实了非线性HRV分析的稳健质量,因为SD1值显示了这里报道的最高ICC(0.902)。因此,虽然5分钟心电图可能仍然是可取的,但对于考虑HRV评估的组织来说,30分钟的测量方法仍然是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Physiological Reports
Physiological Reports PHYSIOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
374
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Physiological Reports is an online only, open access journal that will publish peer reviewed research across all areas of basic, translational, and clinical physiology and allied disciplines. Physiological Reports is a collaboration between The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society, and is therefore in a unique position to serve the international physiology community through quick time to publication while upholding a quality standard of sound research that constitutes a useful contribution to the field.
期刊最新文献
Associations between circulating amino acids and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease in individuals living with severe obesity. Expression and function of Connexin 43 and Connexin 37 in the murine zona glomerulosa. Prolonged sitting is not associated with altered shear-mediated dilation of the internal carotid artery, despite impairing lower limb endothelial function. Quantification of training-induced alterations in body composition via automated machine learning analysis of MRI images in the thigh region: A pilot study in young females. Pemafibrate ameliorates renal injury through induction of FGF21 and ketone body production in male mice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1