[Access requirements for medically assisted death: an open question.]

Q3 Medicine Recenti progressi in medicina Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1701/4416.44113
Lucia Craxì
{"title":"[Access requirements for medically assisted death: an open question.]","authors":"Lucia Craxì","doi":"10.1701/4416.44113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The commentary focuses on the requirements for access to medical assistance in dying in countries where this practice is legal. It shows that the different solutions adopted reflect a different balance between the principles of protection of life, reduction of suffering and respect for autonomy. The article also analyses the potential ethical problems associated with the decision-making capacity of psychiatric patients. It emphasizes the need to assess the capacity on a case-by-case basis, without a priori excluding those suffering from mental disorders. It then examines the nature of existential suffering as a potential single condition for access to medical assistance in dying, highlighting its relevant ethical and social implications.</p>","PeriodicalId":20887,"journal":{"name":"Recenti progressi in medicina","volume":"116 1","pages":"9-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recenti progressi in medicina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1701/4416.44113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The commentary focuses on the requirements for access to medical assistance in dying in countries where this practice is legal. It shows that the different solutions adopted reflect a different balance between the principles of protection of life, reduction of suffering and respect for autonomy. The article also analyses the potential ethical problems associated with the decision-making capacity of psychiatric patients. It emphasizes the need to assess the capacity on a case-by-case basis, without a priori excluding those suffering from mental disorders. It then examines the nature of existential suffering as a potential single condition for access to medical assistance in dying, highlighting its relevant ethical and social implications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[医疗辅助死亡的准入要求:一个悬而未决的问题。]
评注的重点是在这种做法合法的国家,在死亡时获得医疗援助的要求。它表明,所采取的不同解决办法反映了保护生命、减少痛苦和尊重自治原则之间的不同平衡。文章还分析了与精神病患者决策能力相关的潜在伦理问题。它强调有必要在个案基础上评估能力,而不是先验地排除患有精神障碍的人。然后,它审查了作为在死亡中获得医疗援助的潜在单一条件的存在痛苦的性质,强调了其相关的伦理和社会影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Recenti progressi in medicina
Recenti progressi in medicina Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
143
期刊介绍: Giunta ormai al sessantesimo anno, Recenti Progressi in Medicina continua a costituire un sicuro punto di riferimento ed uno strumento di lavoro fondamentale per l"ampliamento dell"orizzonte culturale del medico italiano. Recenti Progressi in Medicina è una rivista di medicina interna. Ciò significa il recupero di un"ottica globale e integrata, idonea ad evitare sia i particolarismi della informazione specialistica sia la frammentazione di quella generalista.
期刊最新文献
[Beyond quantity: rethinking quality and integrity in scientific research.] [Experience of therapy with axi-cel CAR-T in an elderly patient suffering from double expressor DLBCL in an advanced stage and refractory to first-line chemoimmunotherapy.] [From modern science to open science, publishing in the scientific field: copyright, Creative Commons and… beyond.] [In adults with knee osteoarthritis, methotrexate offers minimal pain relief.] [Making open access: history, developments and new challenges.]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1