Advances in Anesthesia Techniques for Postoperative Pain Management in Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery: An Expert Opinion

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-08 DOI:10.1053/j.jvca.2025.01.002
Kexin Yuan MM, Boqun Cui MD, Duomao Lin MD, Haiyan Sun MD, Jun Ma MD, PhD
{"title":"Advances in Anesthesia Techniques for Postoperative Pain Management in Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery: An Expert Opinion","authors":"Kexin Yuan MM,&nbsp;Boqun Cui MD,&nbsp;Duomao Lin MD,&nbsp;Haiyan Sun MD,&nbsp;Jun Ma MD, PhD","doi":"10.1053/j.jvca.2025.01.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) often leads to severe postoperative pain. At present, multimodal analgesia schemes for MICS have attracted much attention, and the application of various chest wall analgesia techniques is becoming increasingly widespread. However, research on anesthesia techniques for postoperative pain management in MICS remains relatively limited at present. We searched for relevant literature and summarized recent related research in eight MICS techniques, including thoracic epidural anesthesia, spinal anesthesia, thoracic paravertebral plane block, erector spinae plane block, serratus anterior plane block, pectoral nerve block, intercostal nerve block, and parasternal block. This article provides an overview of the anatomy and procedures involved in these analgesic techniques, their mechanisms of action, and the latest clinical trial evidence. It also evaluates their progress in MICS, compares their advantages and disadvantages, and discusses practical challenges.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15176,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","volume":"39 4","pages":"Pages 1026-1036"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105307702500028X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) often leads to severe postoperative pain. At present, multimodal analgesia schemes for MICS have attracted much attention, and the application of various chest wall analgesia techniques is becoming increasingly widespread. However, research on anesthesia techniques for postoperative pain management in MICS remains relatively limited at present. We searched for relevant literature and summarized recent related research in eight MICS techniques, including thoracic epidural anesthesia, spinal anesthesia, thoracic paravertebral plane block, erector spinae plane block, serratus anterior plane block, pectoral nerve block, intercostal nerve block, and parasternal block. This article provides an overview of the anatomy and procedures involved in these analgesic techniques, their mechanisms of action, and the latest clinical trial evidence. It also evaluates their progress in MICS, compares their advantages and disadvantages, and discusses practical challenges.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
微创心脏手术术后疼痛处理的麻醉技术进展:专家意见。
微创心脏手术(MICS)往往导致严重的术后疼痛。目前,多模式多模式的MICS镇痛方案备受关注,各种胸壁镇痛技术的应用日益广泛。然而,目前对MICS术后疼痛管理的麻醉技术研究相对有限。我们检索了相关文献,总结了近期在胸硬膜外麻醉、脊髓麻醉、胸椎旁平面阻滞、竖脊肌平面阻滞、前锯肌平面阻滞、胸神经阻滞、肋间神经阻滞、胸骨旁阻滞等8种MICS技术的相关研究。本文概述了这些镇痛技术的解剖和程序,它们的作用机制,以及最新的临床试验证据。它还评估了它们在多指标类集调查中的进展,比较了它们的优势和劣势,并讨论了实际挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
17.90%
发文量
606
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia is primarily aimed at anesthesiologists who deal with patients undergoing cardiac, thoracic or vascular surgical procedures. JCVA features a multidisciplinary approach, with contributions from cardiac, vascular and thoracic surgeons, cardiologists, and other related specialists. Emphasis is placed on rapid publication of clinically relevant material.
期刊最新文献
Pro: All Cardiac Arrest Patients Should Be Transferred To a Cardiac Arrest Center Tachycardia-Induced Cardiomyopathy Due to Atrial Tachycardia During Pregnancy Perioperative Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Use in Lung Transplantation: Analysis of Outcomes and Future Directions Optimizing Risk Prediction: Comparative Study of Surgical Outcome Risk Tool Versions 1 and 2 in Aortic Surgery Dissecting the “Triple Hit” of Perioperative Neurocognitive Disorders after CABG: A Narrative Review of Microemboli, Hypoperfusion, and Inflammation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1