Pulse oximetry at two sensor placement sites in conscious foals.

IF 1.7 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica Pub Date : 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1186/s13028-025-00794-w
Heini Sofia Rossi, Anna Kristina Mykkänen, Jouni Juho Tapio Junnila, Heli Katariina Hyytiäinen
{"title":"Pulse oximetry at two sensor placement sites in conscious foals.","authors":"Heini Sofia Rossi, Anna Kristina Mykkänen, Jouni Juho Tapio Junnila, Heli Katariina Hyytiäinen","doi":"10.1186/s13028-025-00794-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pulse oximetry has not been thoroughly evaluated for assessment of oxygenation in conscious foals. Compared with invasive arterial blood sampling, it is a painless and non-invasive method for real-time monitoring of blood oxygen saturation. The aim of this prospective clinical study was to evaluate the usability, validity, and reliability of pulse oximetry at two measuring sites (lip and caudal abdominal skin fold) for blood oxygen saturation measurement in conscious foals with and without respiratory compromise. Thirty-two foals under one month of age were used. Nineteen foals had normal respiratory and cardiovascular function, and 13 had pneumonia. Pulse oximetry with a transmittance sensor was performed in triplicate on each foal's lip (n = 196 measurements) and/or skin fold (n = 338 measurements), and arterial blood sample was collected. The oxygen saturation values measured by pulse oximetry from the lip and skin fold were compared with each other (n = 58 measurement pairs) and with the calculated arterial oxygen saturation based on arterial blood samples (n = 93 measurement pairs). Furthermore, repeatability of the pulse oximetry measurements was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Measured blood oxygen saturation was clearly associated with the calculated saturation, but on average (± SD) it was 1.8 (± 3.3) percentage units higher from the lip and 5.7 (± 4.3) percentage units higher from the skin fold than the calculated saturation. In concurrent lip and skin fold measurements within a foal, the skin fold measurements were 2.4 (± 2.4) percentage units higher than the lip measurements. The repeatability of three pulse oximetry saturation measurement results was moderate to good and significantly improved when the measurement furthest from the middle-measured value was excluded. The most deviating measurement was often obtained first. Pulse oximetry in general was well tolerated and easy to perform, but as expected in conscious foals, movement and contact problems generated occasional technical difficulties in some individuals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In conscious foals, pulse oximetry with a transmittance sensor attached to the lip (but not to the skin fold) is a clinically applicable and valid method for arterial blood oxygen saturation determination. Several measurements should be obtained and outliers discarded to obtain a reliable result.</p>","PeriodicalId":7181,"journal":{"name":"Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica","volume":"67 1","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11761757/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13028-025-00794-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pulse oximetry has not been thoroughly evaluated for assessment of oxygenation in conscious foals. Compared with invasive arterial blood sampling, it is a painless and non-invasive method for real-time monitoring of blood oxygen saturation. The aim of this prospective clinical study was to evaluate the usability, validity, and reliability of pulse oximetry at two measuring sites (lip and caudal abdominal skin fold) for blood oxygen saturation measurement in conscious foals with and without respiratory compromise. Thirty-two foals under one month of age were used. Nineteen foals had normal respiratory and cardiovascular function, and 13 had pneumonia. Pulse oximetry with a transmittance sensor was performed in triplicate on each foal's lip (n = 196 measurements) and/or skin fold (n = 338 measurements), and arterial blood sample was collected. The oxygen saturation values measured by pulse oximetry from the lip and skin fold were compared with each other (n = 58 measurement pairs) and with the calculated arterial oxygen saturation based on arterial blood samples (n = 93 measurement pairs). Furthermore, repeatability of the pulse oximetry measurements was assessed.

Results: Measured blood oxygen saturation was clearly associated with the calculated saturation, but on average (± SD) it was 1.8 (± 3.3) percentage units higher from the lip and 5.7 (± 4.3) percentage units higher from the skin fold than the calculated saturation. In concurrent lip and skin fold measurements within a foal, the skin fold measurements were 2.4 (± 2.4) percentage units higher than the lip measurements. The repeatability of three pulse oximetry saturation measurement results was moderate to good and significantly improved when the measurement furthest from the middle-measured value was excluded. The most deviating measurement was often obtained first. Pulse oximetry in general was well tolerated and easy to perform, but as expected in conscious foals, movement and contact problems generated occasional technical difficulties in some individuals.

Conclusions: In conscious foals, pulse oximetry with a transmittance sensor attached to the lip (but not to the skin fold) is a clinically applicable and valid method for arterial blood oxygen saturation determination. Several measurements should be obtained and outliers discarded to obtain a reliable result.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在意识清醒的马驹的两个传感器位置进行脉搏血氧测定。
背景:脉搏血氧仪还没有完全评估评估氧合在有意识的马驹。与有创动脉采血相比,它是一种无痛、无创的实时监测血氧饱和度的方法。这项前瞻性临床研究的目的是评估脉搏血氧仪在两个测量部位(唇和尾侧腹部皮肤褶)测量有和没有呼吸损害的清醒马驹血氧饱和度的可用性、有效性和可靠性。使用32匹1个月以下的马驹。19匹马呼吸和心血管功能正常,13匹马患肺炎。用透射传感器对每匹马驹的唇部(n = 196次测量)和/或皮肤褶皱(n = 338次测量)进行三次脉搏血氧测定,并采集动脉血液样本。将唇部和皮肤褶皱脉搏血氧仪测得的血氧饱和度值相互比较(n = 58对),并与根据动脉血样本计算的动脉血氧饱和度值(n = 93对)进行比较。此外,评估了脉搏血氧测量的可重复性。结果:实测血氧饱和度与计算血氧饱和度有明显的相关性,但唇部血氧饱和度比计算血氧饱和度平均高1.8(±3.3)个百分点,皮肤褶血氧饱和度比计算血氧饱和度平均高5.7(±4.3)个百分点。在马驹的唇和皮褶同时测量中,皮褶测量值比唇测量值高2.4(±2.4)个百分比单位。三种脉搏血氧饱和度测量结果的重复性均为中等至良好,在排除离中间测量值最远的测量值后,重复性显著提高。偏差最大的测量结果往往首先得到。一般来说,脉搏血氧测定耐受性良好,易于执行,但正如预期的那样,在有意识的马驹中,运动和接触问题偶尔会在一些个体中产生技术困难。结论:在有意识的马驹中,将透射传感器贴在唇上(而不是贴在皮肤褶皱上)的脉搏血氧仪是一种临床适用且有效的动脉血氧饱和度测定方法。为了获得可靠的结果,必须获得若干测量值,并丢弃异常值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica
Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica is an open access journal encompassing all aspects of veterinary research and medicine of domestic and wild animals.
期刊最新文献
The diagnostic performance of point-of-care tests for serum amyloid A and C-reactive protein in lame sows. A pilot study on the novel use of an ultrasonic toothbrush in dogs: limited effect on dental calculus following a single treatment. Antibodies against tick-borne pathogens in domestic dogs in Norway: Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, tick-borne encephalitis virus, and Anaplasma phagocytophilum. Bacteria identified from deep nasopharyngeal swabs and non-endoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage in calves on farms with a history of bronchopneumonia. Allometry of litter size in dog breeds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1